jordo212000;615247 wrote:smh, the Browns stadium seats almost 10,000 more people. Of course they are going to average more people per game.
The stat that Terry Tate linked here takes into consideration how many people are attending relative to how many seats are available in the stadium. The statistics I posted merely show that on average, Paul Brown Stadium has been closer to being filled to capacity throughout the course of the season.
Through week 16, the "worst" or (worse as you say) fans in the NFL have filled 92.1% of all available seats at Paul Brown Stadium.
One of the "best" fanbases in football have only filled 89.9% of their available seats through week 16.
SMH. Yes i know what the stat meant that terry tate linked. All that stat tells me is Cleveland's stadium is too big for the amount of people in the area, especially considering the fact many people are trying to move out of that area due to the current job market. The fact of the matter is cincy is a more populated area, and they can only get 60,000 per game. That is being generous too as I went to the browns/bengals game at cincy, and it was about 45% browns fans there. So you can thank us cleveland fans for increasing your % to 92. Have the Browns and Bengals trade stadiums and the browns will be near 100% while the piss poor cincy fans will be around 82%. Which brings us back to the main point. There is a reason why the browns have never blacked out since coming back, and cincy does it all the time. Ochocinco can't buy tickets for the fans every time.
I love how you disregard the arguments that blow your idiotic arguments away. Click on every single article i provided to you on the google link, and you will see the browns fans average at #3 and the bengals fans average in the bottom 5. Hmmm i wonder why!?!??!?! There has to be a reason!!!!!!!
Can't wait for your next idiotic response. Are you going to bring up the NBA? Or should I prepare for the fact that Cleveland doesn't show a strong support for soccer?!?
