jordo212000;613089 wrote:He continues to make himself look silly. Some of us keep bringing up Title IX and other impediments to paying players and he instead resorts to this sort of nonsense.
Everyone knows about Title IX. Myself, along with other people that are likely ignoring your constant mentioning of it, are probably in favor of scrapping it. I'd be in favor of doing away with it even if it wasn't to allow athletes to be paid. It's an out-dated, counter-productive law.
By his logic, I should have access to the same resources as the CEO of my company because I just happen to be the one "sweating" on the front lines.
The players aren't just the one's sweating it out, they're the ones with the unique skill-set that is the driving force behind all the money the NCAA makes. If talent-level of the players didn't matter, D3 ball could easily substitute for D1.
Generally pay is given out based upon the value, and scarcity, of the skill-set the employee brings to the job. So it's not a valid comparison to compare NCAA players to guys working a manufacturing line or whatever you're trying to do.
WebFire;613076 wrote:This is in the running for dumbest post of the year. Good thing you snuck it in before the 31st!
Clichedresponsewithnosubstance/10