like_that;607287 wrote:That was a good drive though, and they just wasted it by not getting 7. It was just like the opening drive vs buffalo last week. They are a 5 win team, they have nothing to lose, I don't see a reason why not to go for it. Erica Womangini's vagina is going to send him looking for a new job.
Do you expect people to take you seriously when you post this kind of childish stuff?
While a 5 win team may have nothing to lose, coaches still tend to make decisions based on game situations. And conservative or not, taking the points and hoping your defense might actually stop the other team more than just once in a while, is a valid way of coaching. You might not like it, but I'd bet MOST NFL coaches tend to play this way.
Had the Browns gone for it and gotten stoned, and then proceeded to lose by the same margin -- you'd probably be the first person on here screaming they should have taken the points.
There's no excusing the crap at the end of the first half, but the REAL killer there was a foolish formation penalty that negated a 15 yard penalty against the Bengals that would have put the Browns easily in FG range, and likely near the 10 yard line. Then they followed that up with yet another foolish motion penalty.
Can you really blame Mangini for deciding maybe it was smarter to just punt the ball, and recoup at the half, than risk more clownish mistakes by his offense?
These last two defeats will be front and center for the Fire Mangini crowd, but my question is this: who you going to bring in that won't take us major steps BACKWARDS and force the rebuilding to basically begin all over?
Don't say Holmgren, because that hurts the Browns worse, in my view as he's a stabilizing force in the front office.
Cowher ain't coming for ANY amount of money.
Schottenheimer is too old and retired.
Gruden is the same coach who took a Super Bowl team and ground it into nothing in only a few seasons.
I don't see that golden coach out there, just waiting to come to the Browns and make them an instant winner.