Is it time for private schools to have theyre own playoffs in football

Home ▸ Archive ▸ High School Football ▸ Is it time for private schools to have theyre own playoffs in football
skank's avatar

skank

Senior Member

6,543 posts
Jan 27, 2012 9:42 AM
rmolin73;1066146 wrote:Life isn't fair. What are you all teaching those kids in Massillon.


I believe that lesson is being taught well to them by the OHSAA.
Jan 27, 2012 9:42am
C

Con_Alma

Senior Member

12,198 posts
Jan 27, 2012 9:43 AM
ccrunner609;1067150 wrote:7 divisions in football better drive them to make Wrestling and Track 4 divisions
Noooooo! Please. I would rather see wrestling and track go to 1 division.

There's no reason when they go to a state championship determined by team duals that the individual tournament should be anything but 1 division in wrestling.
Jan 27, 2012 9:43am
D

Dean Wormer

Senior Member

333 posts
Jan 27, 2012 5:18 PM
skank;1065794 wrote:Sorry, when someone resorts to name calling, they're getting frustrated.

Yeah, one of the smallest DI schools in the state playing in 4 semi finals in the past decade, losing a state title game to a PAROCHIAL school TWICE our size by 7 pts....And we're "fading into obscurity."

Again fellas, look at the big picture. Massillon has made it deep enough, I would say more than most.

State Semi's in
72
79
80
82
89
91
01
02
05
09

State Title game in
80
82
05
Yeah, no success there. If we didn't beat publics to get there, (and a few parochials too), who did we beat?
Right here is where you said it. Or do you deny it?
Jan 27, 2012 5:18pm
skank's avatar

skank

Senior Member

6,543 posts
Jan 27, 2012 7:56 PM
Not taken out of context.
Jan 27, 2012 7:56pm
skank's avatar

skank

Senior Member

6,543 posts
Jan 27, 2012 8:17 PM
Massillon has made it deep enough to, NOT BE OBSCURE. Don't try and twist my words.
Jan 27, 2012 8:17pm
sherm03's avatar

sherm03

I go balls deep.

7,349 posts
Jan 27, 2012 8:24 PM
skank;1068068 wrote:Massillon has made it deep enough to, NOT BE OBSCURE. Don't try and twist my words.
Don't get mad at Dean because you don't know how to clearly convey your thoughts.
Jan 27, 2012 8:24pm
skank's avatar

skank

Senior Member

6,543 posts
Jan 27, 2012 9:14 PM
sherm03;1068072 wrote:Don't get mad at Dean because you don't know how to clearly convey your thoughts.


I admit I missed that, but you and the rest of the PBG have tried to twist my words for about 200 pages. As big of a dumb ass as you and the rest of the PBG are, you know I didn't mean it like that.
Jan 27, 2012 9:14pm
D

Dean Wormer

Senior Member

333 posts
Jan 27, 2012 10:13 PM
skank;1068101 wrote:I admit I missed that, but you and the rest of the PBG have tried to twist my words for about 200 pages. As big of a dumb ass as you and the rest of the PBG are, you know I didn't mean it like that.
Neither Sherm or myself said that. You did. I don't think anyone on here is a mind reader to figure out what you meant to say. And you talk about Rocket and his grammar.

And I did not twist your words. I quoted them verbatim. That means word for word for you guys from Massillon and Stuebenville.
Jan 27, 2012 10:13pm
G

genghis dong

Senior Member

391 posts
Jan 28, 2012 9:33 AM
skank;1068101 wrote:I admit I missed that, but you and the rest of the PBG have tried to twist my words for about 200 pages. As big of a dumb ass as you and the rest of the PBG are, you know I didn't mean it like that.
Name calling? Someone must be frustrated.
Jan 28, 2012 9:33am
skank's avatar

skank

Senior Member

6,543 posts
Jan 28, 2012 9:48 AM
Dean Wormer;1068188 wrote:Neither Sherm or myself said that. You did. I don't think anyone on here is a mind reader to figure out what you meant to say. And you talk about Rocket and his grammar.

And I did not twist your words. I quoted them verbatim. That means word for word for you guys from Massillon and Stuebenville.


I admitted forgetting that I actually typed the words "deep enough", but then again YOU tried to make it sound like I meant something else.
Jan 28, 2012 9:48am
sherm03's avatar

sherm03

I go balls deep.

7,349 posts
Jan 28, 2012 11:34 AM
genghis dong;1068331 wrote:Name calling? Someone must be frustrated.
LOL. Reps.
Jan 28, 2012 11:34am
skank's avatar

skank

Senior Member

6,543 posts
Jan 28, 2012 11:55 AM
genghis dong;1068331 wrote:Name calling? Someone must be frustrated.


I'm not above getting frustrated when people don't understand simple sentences. Or even when they try to twist your words.

"Frustration" has been displayed by the PBG throughout this thread, I believe I'm entitled to it once in a while.
Jan 28, 2012 11:55am
R

Rocket08

Senior Member

645 posts
Jan 28, 2012 8:27 PM
"skank is just so used to saying "deep enough" he loses track

He says that to thickthin all the time

as in:

"OK thickthin, you're in deep enough" give me the load now
Jan 28, 2012 8:27pm
D

Dean Wormer

Senior Member

333 posts
Jan 28, 2012 11:13 PM
skank;1068413 wrote:I'm not above getting frustrated when people don't understand simple sentences. Or even when they try to twist your words.

"Frustration" has been displayed by the PBG throughout this thread, I believe I'm entitled to it once in a while.
I understand simple sentences. I quoted your sentence verbatim. I never twisted your words one bit. I can't help it if you are happy with just making the playoffs. I guess if my team never won anything I would be glad to just go DEEP ENOUGH.
Jan 28, 2012 11:13pm
skank's avatar

skank

Senior Member

6,543 posts
Jan 29, 2012 12:38 PM
Rocket08;1068717 wrote:"skank is just so used to saying "deep enough" he loses track

He says that to thickthin all the time

as in:

"OK thickthin, you're in deep enough" give me the load now


Good Catholic education I see.
Jan 29, 2012 12:38pm
T

Thinthickbigred

Senior Member

4,148 posts
Jan 29, 2012 7:50 PM
Rocket08;1068717 wrote:"skank is just so used to saying "deep enough" he loses track

He says that to thickthin all the time

as in:

"OK thickthin, you're in deep enough" give me the load now
Thats why your kid has my DNA . Your old lady wouldnt let me pull out
Jan 29, 2012 7:50pm
D

Dean Wormer

Senior Member

333 posts
Jan 30, 2012 12:53 PM
Thinthickbigred;1069382 wrote:Thats why your kid has my DNA . Your old lady wouldnt let me pull out
If you only knew how stupid that statement is even some dumb river rat like you would find it hilarious. That means funny moron.
Jan 30, 2012 12:53pm
skank's avatar

skank

Senior Member

6,543 posts
Jan 30, 2012 4:50 PM
It can't be any more stupid than post #4652.
Jan 30, 2012 4:50pm
rmolin73's avatar

rmolin73

Senior Member

4,278 posts
Jan 30, 2012 4:56 PM
skank;1070446 wrote:It can't be any more stupid than post #4652.
If it actually existed
Jan 30, 2012 4:56pm
skank's avatar

skank

Senior Member

6,543 posts
Jan 30, 2012 5:01 PM
rmolin73;1070459 wrote:If it actually existed


My bad, 4562.
Jan 30, 2012 5:01pm
D

Dean Wormer

Senior Member

333 posts
Jan 30, 2012 11:40 PM
skank;1070446 wrote:It can't be any more stupid than post #4652.
Here we go again. Gentlemen you are supposed to guess what the hell Skanky means. What have you been drinking lately Skank?
Jan 30, 2012 11:40pm
L

landshark0731

Senior Member

273 posts
Jan 30, 2012 11:44 PM
skank;1070446 wrote:It can't be any more stupid than post #4652.
I think what skank is saying is when Thick posted him for the 4652 time it was stupid. Thick probably didn't let Skanky reciprocate the pleasure!
Jan 30, 2012 11:44pm
R

Rocket08

Senior Member

645 posts
Jan 31, 2012 11:39 AM
landshark0731;1070847 wrote:I think what skank is saying is when Thick posted him for the 4652 time it was stupid.
Oh, I get it, stupid as in good

As in skanked loved to get "posted"


And "DEEP ENOUGH"
Jan 31, 2012 11:39am
R

Rocket08

Senior Member

645 posts
Jan 31, 2012 11:42 AM
Thinthickbigred;1069382 wrote:Thats why your kid has my DNA . Your old lady wouldnt let me pull out
If you ever actually spoke to a women you'd crap all over yourself. Much less ever be able to perform

Now, you and skanky, that's different. The two of you obviously have a "thing"

To each, their own. You just don't need to flaunt your alternative lifestyle to those of us who have actually had conversations with women
Jan 31, 2012 11:42am
skank's avatar

skank

Senior Member

6,543 posts
Feb 2, 2012 4:30 PM
Rocket08;1071198 wrote:If you ever actually spoke to a women you'd crap all over yourself. Much less ever be able to perform

Now, you and skanky, that's different. The two of you obviously have a "thing"

To each, their own. You just don't need to flaunt your alternative lifestyle to those of us who have actually had conversations with women


Wow, you have actually had conversations with women? You stud you.

It probably went something like this.

Rain man: "Hey bundy, I'm gonna go talk to this girl."

"Conversations with women", you really must be a sad little boy.

Bundy: "Did you ask sherm if it was ok?"

Rain man: "Yeah, I just texted him, he said it was ok."

Rain man: "Excuse me, but I...."

Girl: "GET AWAY FROM ME BEFORE I CALL THE POLICE."
Feb 2, 2012 4:30pm