ytownfootball
Posts: 6,978
Nov 7, 2010 8:43pm
1. Oregon
2. Auburn
3. TCU
4. Boise State
5. LSU
6. Stanford
7. Wisconsin
8. Nebraska
9. Ohio State
10. Oklahoma State
2. Auburn
3. TCU
4. Boise State
5. LSU
6. Stanford
7. Wisconsin
8. Nebraska
9. Ohio State
10. Oklahoma State
Z
ZombieKiller
Posts: 817
Nov 7, 2010 8:44pm
Ohio St isn't the 9th best team in the country.
Cleveland Buck
Posts: 5,126
Nov 7, 2010 8:45pm
1 Oregon .9638
2 Auburn .9611
3 TCU .9259
4 Boise State .8662
5 LSU .8170
6 Stanford .7454
7 Wisconsin .7349
8 Nebraska .7298
9 Ohio State .6613
10 Oklahoma State .6211
11 Michigan State .6180
12 Alabama .5490
13 Iowa .5223
14 Utah .4669
15 Arkansas .4569
16 Oklahoma .3900
17 Missouri .3511
18 Arizona .3200
19 Mississippi State .3169
20 Virginia Tech .2647
21 Nevada .1981
22 Florida .0825
23 South Carolina .0807
24 Kansas State .0765
25 Texas A&M .0694
2 Auburn .9611
3 TCU .9259
4 Boise State .8662
5 LSU .8170
6 Stanford .7454
7 Wisconsin .7349
8 Nebraska .7298
9 Ohio State .6613
10 Oklahoma State .6211
11 Michigan State .6180
12 Alabama .5490
13 Iowa .5223
14 Utah .4669
15 Arkansas .4569
16 Oklahoma .3900
17 Missouri .3511
18 Arizona .3200
19 Mississippi State .3169
20 Virginia Tech .2647
21 Nevada .1981
22 Florida .0825
23 South Carolina .0807
24 Kansas State .0765
25 Texas A&M .0694
wes_mantooth
Posts: 17,977
Nov 7, 2010 8:47pm
I think Bama is getting too much love for a 2 loss team....and could be a 3 loss team if it wasn't for an epic choke.
W
wghfan
Posts: 744
Nov 7, 2010 8:50pm
This year I kind of hope that Oregon, and Auburn just win out. That way we can watch a 70-65 score in the national championship game.
C
cats gone wild
Posts: 2,651
Nov 7, 2010 8:54pm
Kinda surprised that LSU jumped up 5 spots and is the top ranked 1 loss team. Big drop from them to Stanford also. With it being the end of the year, I wonder what would happen if AUB loses to Bama......will LSU jump them? That would be ridiculous. The BCS is a joke, IMO
Cleveland Buck
Posts: 5,126
Nov 7, 2010 8:57pm
When Auburn loses to Alabama, they will fall to #3, then jump back up to #2 after beating whatever scrub team the SEC East sends to the title game.
wes_mantooth
Posts: 17,977
Nov 7, 2010 8:58pm
Cleveland Buck;549460 wrote:When Auburn loses to Alabama, they will fall to #3, then jump back up to #2 after beating whatever scrub team the SEC East sends to the title game.
Sad, but probably true.
C
cats gone wild
Posts: 2,651
Nov 7, 2010 9:00pm
Cleveland Buck;549460 wrote:When Auburn loses to Alabama, they will fall to #3, then jump back up to #2 after beating whatever scrub team the SEC East sends to the title game.
I doubt if they only drop one spot. Just look at previous weeks. They would probably jump back up after a SEC title game though, but I doubt it if they jump TCU.
Cleveland Buck
Posts: 5,126
Nov 7, 2010 9:03pm
They would fall to around #4-5 in the polls, but would still be #3 in the BCS because of the computers. Voters believe the SEC champion has a tie-in to the BCS National Championship Game, so they will get back up there, especially after TCU wraps up their season with a 1-11 New Mexico team around that same time.
ytownfootball
Posts: 6,978
Nov 7, 2010 9:06pm
When you get to the last few weeks of the season the computers are pretty spot on, the variations come from voters who are less/more forgiving depending on how the wind is blowing. The SEC as of late.
Just one of the balances/checks I like about the BCS
Just one of the balances/checks I like about the BCS
ptown_trojans_1
Posts: 7,632
Nov 7, 2010 9:07pm
Cleveland Buck;549470 wrote:They would fall to around #4-5 in the polls, but would still be #3 in the BCS because of the computers. Voters believe the SEC champion has a tie-in to the BCS National Championship Game, so they will get back up there, especially after TCU wraps up their season with a 1-11 New Mexico team around that same time.
I would assume they would be ahead of LSU, since they did beat LSU and that would avoid an odd scenario of a possible LSU in the title game without winning the conference. All assuming all win out and Auburn loses just once.
OSU at 9 is fine, but Wisconsin at 7 means it will be near impossible for OSU to jump them. Meaning, if OSU wins out, the debate begins on whether they deserve an at-large over say Boise or Stanford.
sleeper
Posts: 27,879
Nov 7, 2010 9:08pm
Alabama is a joke, they've beaten NO ONE and have 2 freaking losses, one to South Carolina of all schools.
Another week, another SEC joke being told.
Another week, another SEC joke being told.
Ty Webb
Posts: 2,798
Nov 7, 2010 9:10pm
ptown_trojans_1;549473 wrote:I would assume they would be ahead of LSU, since they did beat LSU and that would avoid an odd scenario of a possible LSU in the title game without winning the conference. All assuming all win out and Auburn loses just once.
OSU at 9 is fine, but Wisconsin at 7 means it will be near impossible for OSU to jump them. Meaning, if OSU wins out, the debate begins on whether they deserve an at-large over say Boise or Stanford.
Boise and Stanford would both deserve the bid over OSU
T
the_system
Posts: 465
Nov 7, 2010 9:11pm
I predict one of the Big 12 teams (Nebraska or Okie Light) will make the biggest leap towards the top when it's all said and done.
Nebraska still has games @ Texas A&M, which should be a top 20 team by then, and will play in the B12 title game against either Okie Light (could be top 10) or Oklahoma (could be top 10-15). I don't see Oregon losing, but Auburn/LSU/Bama could cannibalize each other in the SEC. Wisconsin is hurt by having no teams worth noting left and no conference title game. Same with Stanford.
I wouldn't be shocked if Nebraska or Oklahoma State wins the Big 12 title game and comes up with a higher ranking than TCU or Boise St. for the #2 spot.
Nebraska still has games @ Texas A&M, which should be a top 20 team by then, and will play in the B12 title game against either Okie Light (could be top 10) or Oklahoma (could be top 10-15). I don't see Oregon losing, but Auburn/LSU/Bama could cannibalize each other in the SEC. Wisconsin is hurt by having no teams worth noting left and no conference title game. Same with Stanford.
I wouldn't be shocked if Nebraska or Oklahoma State wins the Big 12 title game and comes up with a higher ranking than TCU or Boise St. for the #2 spot.
Cleveland Buck
Posts: 5,126
Nov 7, 2010 9:11pm
ptown_trojans_1;549473 wrote: OSU at 9 is fine, but Wisconsin at 7 means it will be near impossible for OSU to jump them. Meaning, if OSU wins out, the debate begins on whether they deserve an at-large over say Boise or Stanford.
There is no debate. If Wisconsin gets the Rose Bowl bid and Ohio State is 11-1, they will be picked over Boise and Stanford every single time.
ptown_trojans_1
Posts: 7,632
Nov 7, 2010 9:13pm
Cleveland Buck;549482 wrote:There is no debate. If Wisconsin gets the Rose Bowl bid and Ohio State is 11-1, they will be picked over Boise and Stanford every single time.
That is sad and I love OSU.
ytownfootball
Posts: 6,978
Nov 7, 2010 9:13pm
ptown_trojans_1;549473 wrote:I would assume they would be ahead of LSU, since they did beat LSU and that would avoid an odd scenario of a possible LSU in the title game without winning the conference. All assuming all win out and Auburn loses just once.
OSU at 9 is fine, but Wisconsin at 7 means it will be near impossible for OSU to jump them. Meaning, if OSU wins out, the debate begins on whether they deserve an at-large over say Boise or Stanford.
Wiscy has IU, UM and NW
OSU has Penn St, Iowa and UM
I think they both win out OSU pulls ahead honestly, at least in the computer portion. Winning convincingly wouldn't hurt to improve the poll portion either.
ptown_trojans_1
Posts: 7,632
Nov 7, 2010 9:15pm
ytownfootball;549488 wrote:Wiscy has IU, UM and NW
OSU has Penn St, Iowa and UM
I think they both win out OSU pulls ahead honestly, at least in the computer portion. Winning convincingly wouldn't hurt to improve the poll portion either.
But, head to head matters in my mind. If both win out, Wisconsin should go to the Rose Bowl since they beat OSU. Otherwise, it is one more example of how shitty the BCS is.
Ty Webb
Posts: 2,798
Nov 7, 2010 9:16pm
Cleveland Buck;549482 wrote:There is no debate. If Wisconsin gets the Rose Bowl bid and Ohio State is 11-1, they will be picked over Boise and Stanford every single time.
So you would be ok with an undeserving Ohio State getting a bid over an undefeated Boise State?
Cleveland Buck
Posts: 5,126
Nov 7, 2010 9:17pm
Ty Webb;549492 wrote:So you would be ok with an undeserving Ohio State getting a bid over an undefeated Boise State?
An 11-1 Ohio State would be more deserving than an undefeated Boise State.
ytownfootball
Posts: 6,978
Nov 7, 2010 9:18pm
ptown_trojans_1;549491 wrote:But, head to head matters in my mind. If both win out, Wisconsin should go to the Rose Bowl since they beat OSU. Otherwise, it is one more example of how shitty the BCS is.
Oh if they both win out Wiscy is Rose bowl bound by virtue of hth, but OSU might sneak in as an at large...well they will, too much money not to bring them in.
Actually, there's been much speculation that Boise will be left out.
ptown_trojans_1
Posts: 7,632
Nov 7, 2010 9:18pm
Cleveland Buck;549496 wrote:An 11-1 Ohio State would be more deserving than an undefeated Boise State.
Wrong, Going unbeaten is so hard these days, and with a win of ACC possible champ VT, Boise would be more deserving.
Ty Webb
Posts: 2,798
Nov 7, 2010 9:19pm
No...they would not be
An undefeated should always get in over a one-loss team
This arguement will be moot in about 2 weeks anyway
An undefeated should always get in over a one-loss team
This arguement will be moot in about 2 weeks anyway
Cleveland Buck
Posts: 5,126
Nov 7, 2010 9:19pm
The BCS doesn't care who plays in the Rose Bowl or Sugar Bowl. They pick a #1 and a #2 to play for the national championship. They have to allow these bowls to pick the teams they want for these other bowls so they can make money, otherwise, why would they participate in the BCS?