LJ;548763 wrote:Yeah, and Robinson had never run a 3-3-5 before he came to work for RR. The defense scheme is RR's call.
Yes, and I think when RR hires a new DC he must let him run his own defense.
LJ;548763 wrote:Yeah, and Robinson had never run a 3-3-5 before he came to work for RR. The defense scheme is RR's call.
WebFire;549077 wrote:Yes, and I think when RR hires a new DC he must let him run his own defense.
LJ;549142 wrote:But I am telling you that RR will not allow that to happen. He has never done it in the past, he isn't going to start now
bo shemmy3337;549993 wrote:I was at the game and it was great GO BLUE!!!
With that being said, I have stuck up for Greg Robinson for a long time now but he has to go. There were way to many times when UI had guys wide open on 2end and 3rd and long. This is his fault IMO. Getting beat because of youth and inexperience is one thing but have guys not picked up has to be formation. The guy has to go along with everyone on that side of the ball. RR is still not safe IMO but will be if Michigan gets a win this week at Purdue. Like I said for weeks it's not the offense can and does work in the Big Ten. UI was number 15 in the country before the game in Defense and they put up 67 points. I still would love a new coach to come in and have RR as a Offensive coordinator but that is not going to happen so Michigan needs new coaching on Defense and RR needs to let whomever takes over have complete control and only worry about his offense IMO. Going to a bowl game is a good thing and it appears Michigan is finally headed in the right track but only if the defense is fixed.
Tiernan;551408 wrote:You gotta have the athletes to make the stops. scUM simply doesn't have Big 10 First Division personnel on the field no matter who the DC is.