Is RichRod safe at Michigan

Home ▸ Archive ▸ College Sports ▸ Is RichRod safe at Michigan
like_that's avatar

like_that

1st Team All-PWN

26,625 posts
Oct 26, 2010 4:28 PM
I think they beat penn state. 8-4 record.
Oct 26, 2010 4:28pm
krambman's avatar

krambman

Senior Member

3,606 posts
Oct 26, 2010 8:08 PM
redfalcon;532616 wrote:W Uconn
W ND
W Umass
W Bowling Green
W Indiana
L Michigan State
L Iowa

My predictions?
L Penn State
W Illinois
W Purdue
L Wisconsin
L Ohio State

This will end their season with a 7-5 record, which will probably be enough to hold RichRod around for another year, and even if they loose to Illinois, 6-6 with a bowl trip, win or loss, I think they keep him around. If they get swept from the remainder of the season, however, Richrod is done, no question.

Even with the prediction Michigan still has a losing record in conference, which at this point I believe is more important to those in power at UM rather than the overall record. Assuming they lose their final two games they need to win the next three just to finish with a .500 record in conference. I think that may not be good enough to keep him around. However, I also think that Michigan doesn't want to get a Notre Dame like reputation when it comes to coaches and can a guy after three years. So if they lose out he's definitely gone, but if he wins at least two I think it will be just enough to buy him one more year, even though most at the school probably want to get rid of him.
Oct 26, 2010 8:08pm
dwccrew's avatar

dwccrew

Not Banned

7,817 posts
Oct 26, 2010 11:34 PM
Hb31187;530152 wrote:Greg Robinson should be gone before Rrod IMO. Long before

I agree but I do think that Rich Rod does deserve part of the blame for the shitty defense.
Oct 26, 2010 11:34pm
Spread All Day's avatar

Spread All Day

Welcome to the Jungle

985 posts
Oct 27, 2010 1:56 AM
Greg Robinson is a terrible coordinator. Thats for sure. RR isn't a bad coach!
New D coordinator and we're in business! Go BLUE!!
Oct 27, 2010 1:56am
T

Tiernan

Senior Member

13,021 posts
Oct 27, 2010 8:43 AM
Denard gets knocked out for the season this week and BOTH ILL and PUR beat them. Cya Dickie and take that crypt keeper of a wife with you.
Oct 27, 2010 8:43am
B

bo shemmy3337

Senior Member

962 posts
Oct 27, 2010 11:51 AM
dwccrew;534394 wrote:I agree but I do think that Rich Rod does deserve part of the blame for the shitty defense.

I agree, He is the reason they went to a 3-3-5 which is not Robinson bread and butter.
Oct 27, 2010 11:51am
B

bo shemmy3337

Senior Member

962 posts
Oct 27, 2010 11:53 AM
Spread All Day;534536 wrote:Greg Robinson is a terrible coordinator. Thats for sure. RR isn't a bad coach!
New D coordinator and we're in business! Go BLUE!!

Robinson is a very good coordinator. Playing 8 true freshmen this year is not his fault. He is a proven coordinator and he is forced to run RR's 3-3-5.
Oct 27, 2010 11:53am
Hb31187's avatar

Hb31187

Senior Member

8,534 posts
Oct 27, 2010 12:00 PM
Tiernan;534618 wrote:Denard gets knocked out for the season this week and BOTH ILL and PUR beat them. Cya Dickie and take that crypt keeper of a wife with you.

Lmao wow
Oct 27, 2010 12:00pm
Cleveland Buck's avatar

Cleveland Buck

Troll Hunter

5,126 posts
Oct 27, 2010 12:23 PM
They would beat Purdue with Forcier. I don't know if they can beat Illinois with either Forcier or Denard.
Oct 27, 2010 12:23pm
0

0311sdp

Senior Member

580 posts
Oct 27, 2010 3:51 PM
RR hired Robinson so he is responsible for the results, as for playing 8 true freshmen, yes 8 have played but most do not start and rarely have more than 2 or 3 been on the field at the same time. Michigan, I think has enough offense to finish 8-4 and get a decent Bowl game. Is this enough to save RR? probably but next season he must contend for a Big Ten championship and beat Ohio State or he is done.
Oct 27, 2010 3:51pm
Hb31187's avatar

Hb31187

Senior Member

8,534 posts
Oct 27, 2010 3:53 PM
Idk what it matters about Forcier, Denard is playing this week
Oct 27, 2010 3:53pm
S

sportchampps

Senior Member

7,361 posts
Oct 27, 2010 4:20 PM
Michigan should probably worry more about Ill then PSU IMO
Oct 27, 2010 4:20pm
M

MontyBrunswick

Oct 28, 2010 1:08 PM
L Penn State
L Illinois
W or L Purdue
L Wisconsin
L Ohio State

is how I see it. I really can see Denard getting hurt in the coming weeks. I'm surprised he hasn't been hurt (more seriously) yet.
Oct 28, 2010 1:08pm
stroups's avatar

stroups

Senior Member

3,223 posts
Oct 28, 2010 1:34 PM
The only for sure game I see them winning is pudue... they could easily go 1-4 or 2-3

Sent from my DROID2 using Tapatalk
Oct 28, 2010 1:34pm
0

0311sdp

Senior Member

580 posts
Oct 28, 2010 2:46 PM
Michigan has enough offense to give anyone fits, I'm no Michigan fan but I think most of you are underestimating them. The biggest weakness in their defense is pass defense, Illinois can't pass so they will struggle to score enough points to beat them. Purdue is just awful, enough said there. Penn State doesn't score a ton of points either so Michigan is 50-50 on that one, as for OSU and Wisconsin, they are both much better but a couple turnovers and who knows. Michigan I think most likely goes 3-2, 2-3 at worst to end 8-4 or 7-5.
Oct 28, 2010 2:46pm
M

MontyBrunswick

Oct 28, 2010 3:03 PM
Michigan is 50th in rushing defense.
Oct 28, 2010 3:03pm
W

WebFire

Go Bucks!

14,779 posts
Oct 28, 2010 3:32 PM
dlazz;536242 wrote:Michigan is 50th in rushing defense.

54th ;)
Oct 28, 2010 3:32pm
W

WebFire

Go Bucks!

14,779 posts
Oct 28, 2010 3:33 PM
And Penn State is 52nd. Michigan should have a good offensive day against PSU.

I think Michigan beats PSU, Illinois and Purdue. Turnovers will be the key against Wiscy and OSU.
Oct 28, 2010 3:33pm
dwccrew's avatar

dwccrew

Not Banned

7,817 posts
Oct 29, 2010 12:57 AM
WebFire;536280 wrote:And Penn State is 52nd. Michigan should have a good offensive day against PSU.

I think Michigan beats PSU, Illinois and Purdue. Turnovers will be the key against Wiscy and OSU.

This is a pretty good assessment, but I do think that Illinois could beat Michigan. Michigan does match up rather well against them though, so I will just say that Michigan ends up 3-2 and finishes the year 8-4.
Oct 29, 2010 12:57am
W

WebFire

Go Bucks!

14,779 posts
Oct 29, 2010 1:17 PM
dwccrew;536924 wrote:This is a pretty good assessment, but I do think that Illinois could beat Michigan. Michigan does match up rather well against them though, so I will just say that Michigan ends up 3-2 and finishes the year 8-4.

No question Illinois could beat Michigan. If Michigan does end up 8-4, then I think everything is on pace. Most on this forum predicted 4-6 wins.
Oct 29, 2010 1:17pm
G

georgemc80

Senior Member

983 posts
Oct 29, 2010 2:54 PM
WebFire;537301 wrote:No question Illinois could beat Michigan. If Michigan does end up 8-4, then I think everything is on pace. Most on this forum predicted 4-6 wins.

I did predict 6 wins, but then again, I thought UCONN and ND would field average teams this year.
Oct 29, 2010 2:54pm
W

WebFire

Go Bucks!

14,779 posts
Oct 29, 2010 3:52 PM
georgemc80;537392 wrote:I did predict 6 wins, but then again, I thought UCONN and ND would field average teams this year.

Yeah I think most at least picked UM to lose one of those. UConn has certainly been a disappointment.
Oct 29, 2010 3:52pm
Spread All Day's avatar

Spread All Day

Welcome to the Jungle

985 posts
Oct 30, 2010 3:35 PM
I think Michigan can take Penn State, tonight. Then take Illnois. And i also believe they can give wisconsin a game..
GO BLUE!!
Oct 30, 2010 3:35pm
V

vball10set

paying it forward

24,795 posts
Oct 31, 2010 8:52 AM
...if they can win at least two more games, and a win over OSU would go a long way as well--but that's asking a lot
Oct 31, 2010 8:52am
W

WebFire

Go Bucks!

14,779 posts
Oct 31, 2010 9:08 AM
At 8pm last night, I thought he was safe. At 8am today, not so much.

I'm afraid Purdue is the only win left. 6-6 and 2-6 in the Big 10 in his 3rd year isn't gonna fly. The only thing that might keep him here is David Brandon, the AD. But Brandon will get a lot of pressure to fire him.

If he does stay, it must be under the condition that he fires (most of) the defensive staff. Problem is, bringing in a new DC is not going to immediately fix the defense.
Oct 31, 2010 9:08am