Who would get the Rose Bowl bid if Ohio State and Michigan State end up with 1 loss?

Home ▸ Archive ▸ College Sports ▸ Who would get the Rose Bowl bid if Ohio State and Michigan State end up with 1 loss?
B

Blanket

Senior Member

369 posts
Oct 16, 2010 11:09 PM
Since they dont have the head to head tie break, how would they decide it?

Buckeyes have to be huge Iowa fans next Saturday to keep their hopes of a Rose Bowl bid alive.
Oct 16, 2010 11:09pm
Cleveland Buck's avatar

Cleveland Buck

Troll Hunter

5,126 posts
Oct 16, 2010 11:12 PM
If Ohio State and Michigan State finish tied, whoever is ranked higher in the BCS standings would get the Rose Bowl bid.

If Michigan State, Iowa, and Wisconsin all finish tied, and all of them beat each other, Michigan State would get the bid because they beat Wisconsin and had the better overall record than Iowa.
Oct 16, 2010 11:12pm
B

Blanket

Senior Member

369 posts
Oct 16, 2010 11:13 PM
Totally forgot about the BCS standing.
Oct 16, 2010 11:13pm
1_beast's avatar

1_beast

Senior Member

5,642 posts
Oct 17, 2010 1:19 AM
i may be wrong...but dealing with the Big 10 and Rose Bowl...if there is a tie...the team that is farthest removed from a rose bowl appearance gets the bid...? I think!
Oct 17, 2010 1:19am
quaker0764's avatar

quaker0764

Big Boss

108 posts
Oct 17, 2010 1:54 AM
They did away with the longest drought between appearances ruling.
Oct 17, 2010 1:54am
C

Con_Alma

Senior Member

12,198 posts
Oct 17, 2010 8:30 AM
1_beast;522560 wrote:i may be wrong...but dealing with the Big 10 and Rose Bowl...if there is a tie...the team that is farthest removed from a rose bowl appearance gets the bid...? I think!

This is my understanding also.
Oct 17, 2010 8:30am
V

vball10set

paying it forward

24,795 posts
Oct 17, 2010 10:20 AM
quaker0764;522567 wrote:They did away with the longest drought between appearances ruling.
this....and btw, IMO, OSU would get the bid--they travel better,ie bringing in more $$$$$
Oct 17, 2010 10:20am
C

Con_Alma

Senior Member

12,198 posts
Oct 17, 2010 10:50 AM
That's too bad. I thought it was a good thing. When did they do away with that??
Oct 17, 2010 10:50am
karen lotz's avatar

karen lotz

TuTu Train

22,284 posts
Oct 17, 2010 12:44 PM
vball10set;522689 wrote:this....and btw, IMO, OSU would get the bid--they travel better,ie bringing in more $$$$$
They use the Big XII system now, I think. Team ranked highest in BCS standings gets the bid.
Oct 17, 2010 12:44pm
V

vball10set

paying it forward

24,795 posts
Oct 17, 2010 12:55 PM
karen lotz;522820 wrote:They use the Big XII system now, I think. Team ranked highest in BCS standings gets the bid.
gotcha'...but it's still about the bucks (no pun intended)
Oct 17, 2010 12:55pm
karen lotz's avatar

karen lotz

TuTu Train

22,284 posts
Oct 17, 2010 1:05 PM
vball10set;522831 wrote:gotcha'...but it's still about the bucks (no pun intended)
Yeah I agree. The tie breaker would only be for the automatic conference bid. The BCS could select any team they wanted after that, as long as they meet the criteria so OSU would likely be that team.
Oct 17, 2010 1:05pm
2kool4skool's avatar

2kool4skool

Senior Member

1,804 posts
Oct 17, 2010 6:32 PM
If OSU wins out and MSU loses a game, I'd have to think OSU would be higher in the BCS standings.
Oct 17, 2010 6:32pm
Shabaka Bashaarat's avatar

Shabaka Bashaarat

Member

43 posts
Oct 17, 2010 7:52 PM
Who cares. It is a meaningless game. YAY we won a trophy and some roses!
Oct 17, 2010 7:52pm
dwccrew's avatar

dwccrew

Not Banned

7,817 posts
Oct 17, 2010 9:14 PM
Shabaka Bashaarat;523359 wrote:Who cares. It is a meaningless game. YAY we won a trophy and some roses!

A meaningless game with a huge payday.
Oct 17, 2010 9:14pm
Tiger2003's avatar

Tiger2003

Kill or be Killed

15,421 posts
Oct 17, 2010 9:16 PM
Shabaka Bashaarat;523359 wrote:Who cares. It is a meaningless game. YAY we won a trophy and some roses!

Would rather play in the Rose Bowl then the Outback Bowl.
Oct 17, 2010 9:16pm
firestonefan's avatar

firestonefan

Senior Member

417 posts
Oct 17, 2010 9:24 PM
I agree with 1 beast.
Oct 17, 2010 9:24pm
krambman's avatar

krambman

Senior Member

3,606 posts
Oct 17, 2010 9:29 PM
If OSU and Michigan both finish with one loss IF Wisconson also loses another game. Say Iowa beats MSU this weekend, but loses to OSU and Wisconsin. Then the Big Ten Championship would be split three ways and MSU would go to the Rose Bowl (I believe) because Wisconsin beat OSU and MSU beat Wisconsin. As Buckeye fans, we need to be big Iowa fans the rest of the season (except when they play the Buckeye's of course!).
Oct 17, 2010 9:29pm
S

stlouiedipalma

Senior Member

1,797 posts
Oct 18, 2010 12:36 PM
I really don't see anyone else beating Iowa, with the slim possibility of OSU doing that. If that happens the Buckeyes could get the Rose Bowl bid. If OSU doesn't lose again but misses out on the Rose Bowl you can bet that OSU will be coveted by either the Sugar or Orange Bowls. Just think, the Buckeyes against either Boise State or TCU. Losing out on the Nat. Championship game sucks, but I could go for playing one of these teams.

Also, if Oregon goes to the title game then the Big Ten opponent will be determined by the Rose Bowl committee. How about OSU and MSU meeting to settle the score on the field? They'd never do it, but they sure would sell a hell of a lot of tickets.
Oct 18, 2010 12:36pm
wildcats20's avatar

wildcats20

In ROY I Trust!!

27,794 posts
Oct 18, 2010 1:10 PM
If OSU and Michigan both finish with one loss IF Wisconson also loses another game. Say Iowa beats MSU this weekend, but loses to OSU and Wisconsin. Then the Big Ten Championship would be split three ways and MSU would go to the Rose Bowl (I believe) because Wisconsin beat OSU and MSU beat Wisconsin. As Buckeye fans, we need to be big Iowa fans the rest of the season (except when they play the Buckeye's of course!).
Isn't the "who hasn't been there recently" tiebreaker still in effect?
Oct 18, 2010 1:10pm
ts1227's avatar

ts1227

Senior Member

12,319 posts
Oct 18, 2010 1:35 PM
wildcats20;523998 wrote:Isn't the "who hasn't been there recently" tiebreaker still in effect?

Nope, they now live in the present when deciding who goes. Here's the link to all of the Rose Bowl tiebreaks.

http://www.bigten.org/sports/m-footbl/spec-rel/102204aad.html
Oct 18, 2010 1:35pm
Y-Town Steelhound's avatar

Y-Town Steelhound

Underrated

1,388 posts
Oct 20, 2010 3:32 PM
I'll mention it one time since there seems to be a boatload full of posters voyaging towards retard island on this thread.

The tiebreaker is no longer who went to the Rose Bowl last.
Oct 20, 2010 3:32pm
E

enigmaax

Senior Member

4,511 posts
Oct 20, 2010 7:01 PM
stlouiedipalma;523968 wrote:I really don't see anyone else beating Iowa, with the slim possibility of OSU doing that. If that happens the Buckeyes could get the Rose Bowl bid. If OSU doesn't lose again but misses out on the Rose Bowl you can bet that OSU will be coveted by either the Sugar or Orange Bowls. Just think, the Buckeyes against either Boise State or TCU. Losing out on the Nat. Championship game sucks, but I could go for playing one of these teams.

Also, if Oregon goes to the title game then the Big Ten opponent will be determined by the Rose Bowl committee. How about OSU and MSU meeting to settle the score on the field? They'd never do it, but they sure would sell a hell of a lot of tickets.

If Oregon goes to the title game and Boise/TCU/Utah qualify for a BCS game, the Rose Bowl has to take that team to replace Oregon this season.
Oct 20, 2010 7:01pm
E

enigmaax

Senior Member

4,511 posts
Oct 20, 2010 7:07 PM
krambman;523492 wrote:If OSU and Michigan both finish with one loss IF Wisconson also loses another game. Say Iowa beats MSU this weekend, but loses to OSU and Wisconsin. Then the Big Ten Championship would be split three ways and MSU would go to the Rose Bowl (I believe) because Wisconsin beat OSU and MSU beat Wisconsin. As Buckeye fans, we need to be big Iowa fans the rest of the season (except when they play the Buckeye's of course!).

If Michigan State, Wisconsin, and Ohio State all tie and their overall record is the same (which I think has to happen now in that scenario, right?), then they'd still end up back at the BCS ranking as the determining factor. The three way tie can't be broken with head-to-head results unless one team either beat both of the others or if one team lost to both of the others (in which case would eliminate that team and revert the other two back to the two-team tiebreaker).
Oct 20, 2010 7:07pm
E

enigmaax

Senior Member

4,511 posts
Oct 20, 2010 7:09 PM
Y-Town Steelhound;526129 wrote:I'll mention it one time since there seems to be a boatload full of posters voyaging towards retard island on this thread.

The tiebreaker is no longer who went to the Rose Bowl last.

And I think they ditched that about/over a decade ago, though I believe they just added the BCS tiebreaker before this (maybe last?) season.
Oct 20, 2010 7:09pm