S
SUPER787
Posts: 319
Oct 11, 2010 6:54pm
skank;516398 wrote:Massillon had no choice but to leave most of it's starters in, we had to play alot of 2nd and 3rd stringers in the varsity game, this is in no way me saying "we beat you with our second string", but rather explaining why some Steubenville fans MAY think we left them in on purpose.
I guess I could have stated it better; at the end of that game, Massillon had more ammo left than B.R..
I never mentioned the words "on purpose". Sorry you took it that way.
Cheers
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/93a20/93a20f84bb7c591a50588e2286f8804138290b6b" alt="skank's avatar"
skank
Posts: 6,543
Oct 11, 2010 7:11pm
SUPER787;516570 wrote:I guess I could have stated it better; at the end of that game, Massillon had more ammo left than B.R..
I never mentioned the words "on purpose". Sorry you took it that way.
Cheers
No problem, I didn't take it that way, I just wanted to make sure the casual fan, of Steubenville, or any other school for that matter didn't either.
T
Thinthickbigred
Posts: 4,148
Oct 11, 2010 11:19pm
skank;516398 wrote:Massillon had no choice but to leave most of it's starters in, we had to play alot of 2nd and 3rd stringers in the varsity game, this is in no way me saying "we beat you with our second string", but rather explaining why some Steubenville fans MAY think we left them in on purpose.
We were very beat up before the tigers game also and this is in no way an excuse . so onward and upward.