9/18: Notre Dame at Michigan State

Home ▸ Archive ▸ College Sports ▸ 9/18: Notre Dame at Michigan State
killer_ewok's avatar

killer_ewok

iRep

11,379 posts
Sep 19, 2010 10:53 PM
Sonofanump;490302 wrote:OK. Then why respond specifically to me.
To be clear.
Sep 19, 2010 10:53pm
S

Sonofanump

Sep 19, 2010 10:54 PM
karen lotz;490299 wrote:There isn't any video of the WR out of bounds play in that link.

I can not find one either. 7:43 in the 4th.
I'll mark it down here so if I get a copy I will know where in the video to look for the play.
Sep 19, 2010 10:54pm
dwccrew's avatar

dwccrew

Not Banned

7,817 posts
Sep 19, 2010 11:31 PM
IMO, ND and MSU played very equal. The one thing I noticed about ND is that the defense is too slow and they don't wrap up when tackling. I don't know how many times I thought a ball carrier would be tackled and the got extra yards. However, I was more impressed with ND's offense than MSU's, I think it all came down to not being ready for a trick play because these teams were equal overall.
Sep 19, 2010 11:31pm
ytownfootball's avatar

ytownfootball

Bold faced liar...

6,978 posts
Sep 19, 2010 11:39 PM
MSU gained a lot of yards when they got to the edges, not as well when they went up the gut, so yeah, I agree about the speed being a little lacking on D.
Sep 19, 2010 11:39pm
dwccrew's avatar

dwccrew

Not Banned

7,817 posts
Sep 19, 2010 11:42 PM
ytownfootball;490394 wrote:MSU gained a lot of yards when they got to the edges, not as well when they went up the gut, so yeah, I agree about the speed being a little lacking on D.

They did have a few runs up the gut that got some extra yardage because of bad tackling, but you are correct, most the yards were due to getting beat on the edge.
Sep 19, 2010 11:42pm
T

Tiernan

Senior Member

13,021 posts
Sep 20, 2010 1:23 PM
nothing really to add...just wanted ND posters to see my new signature and gloat some more.

God Sat was beautiful...scUM wins but really loses, ND gets a taste of what they've done for years in SB and AZ takes the starch out of IOWA's shorts.
Sep 20, 2010 1:23pm
karen lotz's avatar

karen lotz

TuTu Train

22,284 posts
Sep 20, 2010 1:24 PM
Tiernan;490821 wrote:nothing really to add...


Understatement of the century.
Sep 20, 2010 1:24pm
T

Tiernan

Senior Member

13,021 posts
Sep 20, 2010 1:30 PM
^^^
now that was actually semi-clever Lotz. Golf-clap for you.
Sep 20, 2010 1:30pm
karen lotz's avatar

karen lotz

TuTu Train

22,284 posts
Sep 20, 2010 3:36 PM
Nope, the link was just posted on twitter.


and it is you're or you are.
Sep 20, 2010 3:36pm
Tiger2003's avatar

Tiger2003

Kill or be Killed

15,421 posts
Sep 20, 2010 4:08 PM
karen lotz;490998 wrote:Nope, the link was just posted on twitter.


and it is you're or you are.

Grammar police lol
Sep 20, 2010 4:08pm
S

Sonofanump

Sep 20, 2010 5:07 PM
What about the referee, who on that particular play had a closer and clearer view of both the play clock and the ball being snapped?


http://www.sportsbybrooks.com/it-appeared-spartan-clock-expired-because-it-did-29009

Maybe because the referee is busy looking at the holder and the kicker, both of which are afforded special protection and have special rules on the play.
Sep 20, 2010 5:07pm
karen lotz's avatar

karen lotz

TuTu Train

22,284 posts
Sep 20, 2010 5:19 PM
Sonofanump;491086 wrote:Maybe because the referee is busy looking at the holder and the kicker, both of which are afforded special protection and have special rules on the play.

Are they in need of special protection before the ball is snapped?
Sep 20, 2010 5:19pm
karen lotz's avatar

karen lotz

TuTu Train

22,284 posts
Sep 20, 2010 5:20 PM
Also, did you get the report from the Big East office yet?
Sep 20, 2010 5:20pm
S

Sonofanump

Sep 20, 2010 5:23 PM
So you want the referee to have the clock, then snap, the holder and kicker?
Sep 20, 2010 5:23pm
S

Sonofanump

Sep 20, 2010 5:24 PM
karen lotz;491102 wrote:Also, did you get the report from the Big East office yet?

No, I'll have reviewed the video by Thursday.
Sep 20, 2010 5:24pm
karen lotz's avatar

karen lotz

TuTu Train

22,284 posts
Sep 20, 2010 5:26 PM
Again what special protection is needed in the split second between the snap and when it would be possible for there to be contact with kicker/holder?
Sep 20, 2010 5:26pm
S

Sonofanump

Sep 20, 2010 5:28 PM
karen lotz;491110 wrote:Again what special protection is needed in the split second between the snap and when it would be possible for there to be contact with kicker/holder?

Is this the same split second that the backjudge gets to go from clock to snap? I do not agree that it needs changed.
Sep 20, 2010 5:28pm
karen lotz's avatar

karen lotz

TuTu Train

22,284 posts
Sep 20, 2010 5:33 PM
Backjudge 50 yards away under the goal posts?
Sep 20, 2010 5:33pm
V

vball10set

paying it forward

24,795 posts
Sep 20, 2010 5:52 PM
^^^nice attempt, but it won't matter ;)
Sep 20, 2010 5:52pm
DeyDurkie5's avatar

DeyDurkie5

Senior Member

11,324 posts
Sep 20, 2010 6:05 PM
karen lotz;491113 wrote:Backjudge 50 yards away under the goal posts?

"Back judge"...dumbass learn how to spell!
Sep 20, 2010 6:05pm
karen lotz's avatar

karen lotz

TuTu Train

22,284 posts
Sep 20, 2010 6:08 PM
DeyDurkie5;491155 wrote:"Back judge"...dumbass learn how to spell!

Good call, should have caught it in sonofanump's post.


FYI it is dumb ass, not dumbass. Good talk.
Sep 20, 2010 6:08pm