CenterBHSFan;466242 wrote:Why isn't Beck qualified to be a spokesperson for the tea party? Or for that matter, Palin?
What qualifications do you think are needed?
What qualifications were needed at the first and historical tea party?
Do you realize what kind of argument you just portrayed?
Most of the Left adores Colin Powell, so if he were in charge, then they would likely claim it a legit organization. Of course, Mr. Powell is of the left-center political persuasion and I'm sure he sees nothing good of the Tea Party movement. So how could he lead a group with which he doesn't agree?
The fact the Tea Party has no annointed leader is what makes it a great movement. If it had one, then the leader would be demonized, ridiculed, impugned and become the subject of every other one of Saul Alinsky's rules for radicals from the elitists. Don't believe me?--See how they go after Beck, Hannity, and Palin and you have your proof. The fact it is an amorphous organization with thousands of groups but no titular head for the elitists to attack makes it impossible for them to get their hands around. So they deny it exists, deny it has any punch, deny the size of it, deny it because it is "leader-less", and when all else fails, call it a racist organization. When they can't debate the ideals, they call it racist and the discussion ends for them. So far, these tactics have failed as the movement is larger than ever before. I'm going to bet they even deny its existence on November 3rd when they are asking..."what happened?"