data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/55ad4/55ad40c91c6d3630bb732eae806eaee6e71fb1c5" alt="wes_mantooth's avatar"
wes_mantooth
Posts: 17,977
Aug 9, 2010 5:26pm
justincredible;446587 wrote:I am kinda leaning towards the asus.
Good choice. Looks like the only complaints are about the PCI slot placements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3a721/3a7210bc3cd307f8df53e8811c3a6832b4110f7e" alt="justincredible's avatar"
justincredible
Posts: 32,056
Aug 9, 2010 5:49pm
I like that the MSi has SLI capability, which as far as I can tell means I can hook up multiple lower end graphics cards to boost graphics performance. Correct me if that is wrong.
I like the Asus because it has 6Gb/sec SATA and USB3 already on it.
It really is a tossup. Dammit.
I like the Asus because it has 6Gb/sec SATA and USB3 already on it.
It really is a tossup. Dammit.
I
I Wear Pants
Posts: 16,223
Aug 9, 2010 6:43pm
SLI and Crossfire are the brand names of the multi-card graphics solutions from Nvidea and ATI respectively.
You're usually better off going with a single more powerful card than dual cards on the performance front than you are linking them because while the efficiency is much increased from when SLI/Crossfire was first introduced it still isn't 100%.
You're usually better off going with a single more powerful card than dual cards on the performance front than you are linking them because while the efficiency is much increased from when SLI/Crossfire was first introduced it still isn't 100%.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3a721/3a7210bc3cd307f8df53e8811c3a6832b4110f7e" alt="justincredible's avatar"
justincredible
Posts: 32,056
Aug 9, 2010 6:47pm
Ah, gotcha. I'll probably go Asus then.