Ty Webb;1117814 wrote:Yes he is Belly......and there is NOTHING you can do about it.

ButBelly.... You didn't answer my question....who is your President then?

Have you heared of voting, educating others, teaching values and the peoples rights within the Constitution, and with holding 50 gal drums and wooden pallets Union assholes.

I answer to only one The Lord and everyone else is secondary and meaningless. I answer to no one who does not hold the standard and integrity that I hold. Unlike you weak, mindless drool followers of incompetent individuals. You reveal in the ideology of calling some one President, that mentality of slavery and union ownership of its mindless membership. I am my own master and don’t need to answer nor respect one Public Servant. Three Branches of Government for the people and by the people not some half ass community flunky organizer.

Belly35;1117905 wrote:Have you heared of voting, educating others, teaching values and the peoples rights within the Constitution, and with holding 50 gal drums and wooden pallets Union assholes.

I answer to only one The Lord and everyone else is secondary and meaningless. I answer to no one who does not hold the standard and integrity that I hold. Unlike you weak, mindless drool followers of incompetent individuals. You reveal in the ideology of calling some one President, that mentality of slavery and union ownership of its mindless membership. I am my own master and don’t need to answer nor respect one Public Servant. Three Branches of Government for the people and by the people not some half ass community flunky organizer.

1.You are really comparing supporting President Obama to slavery? You cannot be serious right?

2.Thank you for NOT answering my question again.

3.You are a US citizen right? Then President Obama is your President Belly,unless you're willing to give up your citizenship

Ty Webb;1117814 wrote:Yes he is Belly......and there is NOTHING you can do about it.

ButBelly.... You didn't answer my question....who is your President then?

Ty Webb;1118014 wrote:1.You are really comparing supporting President Obama to slavery? You cannot be serious right?

2.Thank you for NOT answering my question again.

3.You are a US citizen right? Then President Obama is your President Belly,unless you're willing to give up your citizenship

DeyDurkie5;1118015 wrote:

And that has WHAT to do with my discussion with Belly?

Ty Webb;1118017 wrote:And that has WHAT to do with my discussion with Belly?

it has everything in the world to do with your discussion with belly.

DeyDurkie5;1118026 wrote:it has everything in the world to do with your discussion with belly.

Please explain?

Because unless I;m looking at that stupid picture wrong....it shows no proof of President Obama not being Belly's President

Ty Webb;1118027 wrote:Please explain?

Because unless I;m looking at that stupid picture wrong....it shows no proof of President Obama not being Belly's President

The point is, while obama is the president, it doesn't mean belly has to like or support him. Hence the reason he says he isn't his president.

Also, how is that picture stupid gibby? You said the same shit about bush LOL

DeyDurkie5;1118033 wrote:The point is, while obama is the president, it doesn't mean belly has to like or support him. Hence the reason he says he isn't his president.

Also, how is that picture stupid gibby? You said the same shit about bush LOL

I said nothing of the like about Bush.....

As much as Belly wants to act like President Obama isn't his President...as long as he is a US citizen he is Belly's President and there isn't a fucking thing Belly can do about it.

Ty Webb;1118035 wrote:I said nothing of the like about Bush.....

LOL okay gibby, whatever you want to believe. It's people like you, that are fucking our country in the ass. Just saying.

I never,ever said anything about Bush not being my President.

Did I disagree with things he did? Yes

To say you don't consider the current POTUS to be your President is downright disrespectful and THAT kind of atttitude is whats fucking this country up.

HitsRus;1117225 wrote:and now word that ObamaKare..will cost twice what was sold to us at its inception according to the CBO...
http://campaign2012.washingtonexaminer.com/blogs/beltway-confidential/cbo-obamacare-cost-176-trillion-over-10-yrs/425831

That's just a bad understanding of what the CBO said.

It's a newly revised estimate for 10 years. Meaning 2012-2022 which would contain one more year of the Medicaid coverage expansion than last years 2012-2021 estimate (since the expansion starts in 2014) hence the extra cost. Last year was estimated at $1.445 trillion and this year at $1.496 trillion. I don't know where you learned math but that isn't double.

Also, that CBO estimate from last year estimated that the net result would be positive because of new revenues and cost reduction. The CBO report this year that you and that article referenced estimates that gain to have grown which makes sense for the same reason as the extra cost (additional year after the implementation in 2014 included).

Now you can still disagree with the CBO estimate but don't fudge the numbers to make it look like something it isn't.

http://www.tnr.com/blog/jonathan-cohn/101741/cbo-obamacare-cost-deficit-lie-double-price-fox

Belly35;1117905 wrote:Have you heared of voting, educating others, teaching values and the peoples rights within the Constitution, and with holding 50 gal drums and wooden pallets Union assholes.

I answer to only one The Lord and everyone else is secondary and meaningless. I answer to no one who does not hold the standard and integrity that I hold. Unlike you weak, mindless drool followers of incompetent individuals. You reveal in the ideology of calling some one President,that mentality of slavery and union ownership of its mindless membership. I am my own master and don’t need to answer nor respect one Public Servant. Three Branches of Government for the people and by the people not some half ass community flunky organizer.

Hilarious.

That's just a bad understanding of what the CBO said.

It's a newly revised estimate for 10 years

No, that's a bad understanding of what I said. I said ObamaKare was "sold" to the American taxpayer... as costing 'only' 900 billion over a ten year period by the bill's proponents and by "my" President. That was the talking point used repeatedly...no Democrat said that the actual cost for ten years of ObamaKare is $1.46 trillion. ( plus this plus that). It was disingenuous to include a year which virtually has no outlays in their original 10 year estimates. This is something one might expect out of a used car salesman....but certainly NOT from "my" President.

Most congressen/women hadn't even read the 1000+ page novel(apparently fictional) of this healthcare bill when voting on its passage, let alone the average American. While most of the liberal elite have no respect for the uneducated rubes that they think make up this country, I'll bet the people are smart enough to understand the saying..."fool me once, shame on you...fool me twice, shame on me".

Not twice. Not with this bill. Not with "my" president.

Ty Webb;1118014 wrote:1.You are really comparing supporting President Obama to slavery? You cannot be serious right?

Enslaving the citizens to the government and to untenable government debt is hideous. No one has enslaved more people with more debt than obama; he is the master of all debt and destruction.

QuakerOats;1118162 wrote:Enslaving the citizens to the government and to untenable government debt is hideous. No one has enslaved more people with more debt than obama; he is the master of all debt and destruction.

The American Dream has been replaced by the Gubmit Tit

HitsRus;1118143 wrote: It was disingenuous to include a year which virtually has no outlays in their original 10 year estimates. This is something one might expect out of a used car salesman....but certainly NOT from "my" President.

Took a page right out of the Countrywide playbook, eh?

gut;1118217 wrote:The American Dream has been replaced by the Gubmit Tit

Naw...You have it all wrong. It's simply a matter of receiving your Fair Share of Mediocrity.

Yeah...but if we all become meatty- ocre...who gonna pay the taxes?

HitsRus;1119147 wrote:Yeah...but if we all become meatty- ocre...who gonna pay the taxes?

Watchu talkin' 'bout, Willis? The eeeevil rich will need to pay more of their Fair Share.

It's about Progressive control of a - um - progressive tax structure.

lol, the Buffet Tax will only bring in 31 Billion over 11 years. hahahahaha, yes liberals, it's true. Taxing the rich more is going to solve our problems. That's not even 3 billion a year. You can cut that much from the budget in pure waste per month. Are the liberals prepared to cut the budget enough that this 3 billion/year will balance the budget, because that's what I keep hearing. We must tax the rich more and THEN cut the budget. Well, now you know how much you'll have to cut.

Also, note that the AMT makes much much much more than the "Buffet" tax would. Can we finally put this crap to rest and stop letting that liberal rich idiot on the news?

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/46796967/ns/business/#.T2jJvtm2b2h

A bill designed to enact President Barack Obama's plan for a "Buffett rule" tax on people earning more than $1 million a year would rake in just $31 billion over the next 11 years, according to an estimate by Congress' official tax analysts obtained by The Associated Press. That would be a drop in the bucket of the over $7 trillion in federal budget deficits projected during that period.

The figure is also miniscule compared to the many hundreds of billions the government earns from the alternative minimum tax, which Obama's budget last month said he would replace with the Buffett rule tax.

^^^Tell me it isn't so. All our lives we've been told the rich need to pay more of their fair share so we can all have more fruitful lives. Now you're telling me the numbers don't crunch?

Shit....guess that means I have to go to work today. Man life sucks.

http://campaign2012.washingtonexaminer.com/blogs/beltway-confidential/wh-ryan-aggressively-and-deliberately-ignorant/439371


Didn't take but a day for team obama to launch the attacks on the Ryan/House budget.

God can it be November tomorrow, please?

QuakerOats;1123173 wrote:God can it be November tomorrow, please?

Nope. The Bammer still has time to send his daughters and a couple of dozen Secret Service agents on at least a couple of more vacations.

The budget issue should be hammered again and again and again....and again this election. Most people in America know we have a crisis on our hands with the deficit. The simple fact of the matter is Obama and the Dems have ZERO ZERO ZERO chance of making any progress on reducing the deficit because Harry Reid's Senate hasn't even proposed a budget in YEARS.

I don't know how they could defend themselves against that, really. Fact is they aren't proposing much, if anything, because they don't want it to be used against them in the elections. They can't propose any real cuts or they risk the welfare vote staying home. They can't NOT propose cuts or they risk losing moderates. So they do nothing.

QuakerOats;1123173 wrote:http://campaign2012.washingtonexaminer.com/blogs/beltway-confidential/wh-ryan-aggressively-and-deliberately-ignorant/439371


Didn't take but a day for team obama to launch the attacks on the Ryan/House budget.




God can it be November tomorrow, please?

Why not bash it? Doesnt really do anything. More "conservatives" playing the same old game

http://www.huntingtonnews.net/26887