QuakerOats;852685 wrote:The factual analysis is rather simple:

Unemployment under obama: worse, much worse

Deficits under obama: worse, much worse

Debt under obama: worse, much worse

Dependency under obama: worse, much worse

Regulation under obama: worse, much worse

Dollar under obama: worse, much worse

GDP under obama: worse, much worse

Gas prices under obama: worse, much worse

Unemployment among blacks: worse, much worse

Poverty rate: worse, much worse


The only things he has been good at are creating debt and printing record amounts of food stamps.

Change we can believe in ......

iclfan2;853619 wrote:I saw something today that I had to laugh at. The town next to mine has about 5000 people MAX. Under Obama's stupid porkulus (it had a sign up) they built a brand new fire station. This may not be too outlandish except the building is huge, and the town does not have an full time fire men. So basically it was more pointless spending, as the old fire station was fine enough to house the 1 or 2 trucks they actually have. I understand in the scheme of things it is little money, but if that is what a ton of projects went towards it was pointless.

“Look at the history of this – the fact of the matter is that this is essentially a Tea Party downgrade. The Tea Party brought us to the brink of a default.”

-- David Axelrod, top political consultant to President Obama, in an appearance on “Face the Nation.”

The decision by Standard and Poor’s to downgrade the rating of U.S. government debt is:

A) A meritless attack by a biased agency that can’t even do math.

B) The deserved result of the fiscal recklessness of a conservative cabal inside the Republican Party

C) Both A and B

For the Obama White House, the answer has been an emphatic, and sometimes confusing, C.

The administration and the president’s re-election campaign have taken a two-pronged counterattack on the credit-rating rip.

QuakerOats;855268 wrote:Now the radicals are trying to shoot the messengers -- &#$^ ing incredible; they have absolutely zero shame.

The socialists/marxists are doing a fine job of buckling the capitalist economy we once had.

I don't know if we will survive until Nov '12.

QuakerOats;855268 wrote:I don't know if we will survive until Nov '12.

Ty Webb;855406 wrote:Those of you predicting President Obama's demise might want to think about this:

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/twitter/archive/message.php?message=100687610011336704&date=1312840771

Also.....he beats a "generic" Republican by 3 in the lateest NBC/Gallup poll after trailing by in the July Poll

Ty Webb;855406 wrote:Those of you predicting President Obama's demise might want to think about this:

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/twitter/archive/message.php?message=100687610011336704&date=1312840771

Also.....he beats a "generic" Republican by 3 in the lateest NBC/Gallup poll after trailing by in the July Poll

coyotes22;855586 wrote:hey pollster boy, do some homework. dont let the msm do all your thinking for you.

Reagans numbers in 1983, job approval numbers, were going UPPPPPPPP since May of that year. about 44% in may of '83 to a peek of about 63% in Dec of '83 and flat lined at 58% till the election of '84. Obama's have been going down down down down. in fact he (obama) was at about 53-54%in june to his current 47%. thats 6-7% in a month.

Reagan job approvals in aug '83= 52% and rising
Obama job approvals in aug '11= 47% and falling

To continue to compare Reagan to Obama is getting out of hand.

Manhattan Buckeye;855873 wrote:
If Obama says the "I" word one more time I'm donating all of what is rest of our bank account to Romney's campaign.

You didn't inherit anything, you ran for office and accepted the position. If you don't want it you can resign. What a horrible, horrible leader.

gut;855922 wrote:Look how quickly America reversed a large disparity in the House to give control back to the Repubs. That's a pretty strong vote of no confidence in the Obama and Liberal agenda.

believer;855951 wrote:Naw...According to Boatshoes despite ObamaKare, Gubmint Motors, and the $800 billion Porkulus Sammich, the prez is governing right of center.

coyotes22;855586 wrote:To continue to compare Reagan to Obama is getting out of hand.

wkfan;856134 wrote:The only thing that BHO has in common with Ronald Reagan are that both are Presidents and both are actors....RR acted in movies prior to his political career and BHO is still acting as a President and leader of our country.

wkfan;856134 wrote:The only thing that BHO has in common with Ronald Reagan are that both are Presidents and both are actors....RR acted in movies prior to his political career and BHO is still acting as a President and leader of our country.

gut;856200 wrote:Won't be the least bit surprised to see Obama popping-up in movies, perhaps even more than a cameo, after being POTUS. Will probably be more profitable than giving motivational speeches, particularly if his teleprompter holds out for more money.