Ohio Chatter
Ohio Chatter

Forums

All Threads Serious Business Sports Politics Archive Pick 'ems Wordio
Log In Create Account

Rich Rod! You...

Home ▸ Archive ▸ College Sports ▸ Rich Rod! You...
sleeper's avatar

sleeper

Legend

27,879 posts
Nov 23, 2009 3:19 AM
It doesn't matter who the coach is, Ohio State is on another level in college football. We will beat Michigan for the next 50 years at least, it's that bad.
Nov 22, 2009 10:19pm
dwccrew's avatar

dwccrew

Not Banned

7,817 posts
Nov 23, 2009 3:34 AM
sleeper wrote: It doesn't matter who the coach is, Ohio State is on another level in college football. We will beat Michigan for the next 50 years at least, it's that bad.
That's it?
Nov 22, 2009 10:34pm
sleeper's avatar

sleeper

Legend

27,879 posts
Nov 23, 2009 3:40 AM
dwccrew wrote:
sleeper wrote: It doesn't matter who the coach is, Ohio State is on another level in college football. We will beat Michigan for the next 50 years at least, it's that bad.
That's it?
What else is there to say? Michigan is a crumb of a football program and has no chance as long as Tressel is coach and I don't see him ever retiring. He'll even coach when he's dead, he's that good.
Nov 22, 2009 10:40pm
dwccrew's avatar

dwccrew

Not Banned

7,817 posts
Nov 23, 2009 3:44 AM
sleeper wrote:
dwccrew wrote:
sleeper wrote: It doesn't matter who the coach is, Ohio State is on another level in college football. We will beat Michigan for the next 50 years at least, it's that bad.
That's it?
What else is there to say? Michigan is a crumb of a football program and has no chance as long as Tressel is coach and I don't see him ever retiring. He'll even coach when he's dead, he's that good.
No, I meant that is all the longer you see OSU beating Michigan for? I say at least 150 years.

Yea, Michigan could beat OSU in the 1900's when OSU had club football teams playing against a national powerhouse, but this is not 1900 anymore.
Nov 22, 2009 10:44pm
sleeper's avatar

sleeper

Legend

27,879 posts
Nov 23, 2009 4:16 AM
dwccrew wrote:
sleeper wrote:
dwccrew wrote:
sleeper wrote: It doesn't matter who the coach is, Ohio State is on another level in college football. We will beat Michigan for the next 50 years at least, it's that bad.
That's it?
What else is there to say? Michigan is a crumb of a football program and has no chance as long as Tressel is coach and I don't see him ever retiring. He'll even coach when he's dead, he's that good.
No, I meant that is all the longer you see OSU beating Michigan for? I say at least 150 years.

Yea, Michigan could beat OSU in the 1900's when OSU had club football teams playing against a national powerhouse, but this is not 1900 anymore.
I predict that Michigan will cease to have a football program after 56 straight losses to Ohio State, tis why I picked 50. But yeah, assuming Michigan doesn't just up and quit, 150 is definitely possible.
Nov 22, 2009 11:16pm
dwccrew's avatar

dwccrew

Not Banned

7,817 posts
Nov 23, 2009 4:26 AM
sleeper wrote:
I predict that Michigan will cease to have a football program after 56 straight losses to Ohio State, tis why I picked 50. But yeah, assuming Michigan doesn't just up and quit, 150 is definitely possible.
Michigan has already ceased to have a football program. It's just a bunch of players that no other school wanted playing for a coach that couldn't win a title in pop warner leagues. Just saying....
Nov 22, 2009 11:26pm
sleeper's avatar

sleeper

Legend

27,879 posts
Nov 23, 2009 4:28 AM
dwccrew wrote:
sleeper wrote:
I predict that Michigan will cease to have a football program after 56 straight losses to Ohio State, tis why I picked 50. But yeah, assuming Michigan doesn't just up and quit, 150 is definitely possible.
Michigan has already ceased to have a football program. It's just a bunch of players that no other school wanted playing for a coach that couldn't win a title in pop warner leagues. Just saying....
Touche'
Nov 22, 2009 11:28pm
O

OldDanTucker

Senior Member

283 posts
Nov 23, 2009 4:32 AM
dwccrew wrote:
OldDanTucker wrote: Really? I saw a pretty good game today from the wolverines. Enjoy it while you can suckeye fans because if this michigan team can keep it this close with 5 turnovers then you might want to look out in the future.
You saw a good game? If RR wouldn't have ran D-Rob on 1st and 2nd then bring in Tate on thrid down, UM could have won today. I'm sorry, but RR made Tressel's in-game adjustments look genius today.
Pescara71 wrote: Devin Gardner will make a big difference next year. Rich Rod just cant go south to florida 2 nd level talent at UM like he did at WVU. He hasnt had time to, if he could.
SHAW is a pUNK!!

I'm enjoying every WIN this Buckeye fan gets, good things never last, just ask a UM fan about the 90's.
Yea, yea....we heard the same thing about Tate Forcier last year. We see how that has worked out. UM fans all over his jock the first half of the season, then they turn on him. He's a true freshman, he'll be better next year, probably somewhere else though.

Gardner will go through the same things Forcier has this season.
Forcier had 38 pass attempts and 6 rush, Robinson had 4 pass attempts and 10 rush. Yea looks like rich rod really had robinson run on 1st and 2nd then tate throw on 3rd down. What was Tressels in-game adjusments. Lets see here Michigan had 309 total yards and OSU had 318, what exactly did sweater vest adjust to that was so amazing? Turnovers is what killed michigan and last time I checked Rich-Rod can't throw the ball for tate. Forcier lost the game for michigan plain and simple (5 turnovers) and im pretty sure that every turnover was on him (bad passes on the int's and carrying the ball like a loaf of bread on the fumble).
Nov 22, 2009 11:32pm
dwccrew's avatar

dwccrew

Not Banned

7,817 posts
Nov 23, 2009 4:34 AM
OldDanTucker wrote:
Forcier had 38 pass attempts and 6 rush, Robinson had 4 pass attempts and 10 rush. Yea looks like rich rod really had robinson run on 1st and 2nd then tate throw on 3rd down. What was Tressels in-game adjusments. Lets see here Michigan had 309 total yards and OSU had 318, what exactly did sweater vest adjust to that was so amazing? Turnovers is what killed michigan and last time I checked Rich-Rod can't throw the ball for tate. Forcier lost the game for michigan plain and simple (5 turnovers) and im pretty sure that every turnover was on him (bad passes on the int's and carrying the ball like a loaf of bread on the fumble).

Tressel didn't need to make in-game adjustments. OSU was playing Michigan, it's not as if OSU needed to make too many adjustments.
Nov 22, 2009 11:34pm
O

OldDanTucker

Senior Member

283 posts
Nov 23, 2009 4:34 AM
Also you O$U fans want to talk about hype for a qb? Really? What has Pryor done to win a game for you guys yet?
Nov 22, 2009 11:34pm
O

OldDanTucker

Senior Member

283 posts
Nov 23, 2009 4:36 AM
dwccrew wrote:
OldDanTucker wrote:
Forcier had 38 pass attempts and 6 rush, Robinson had 4 pass attempts and 10 rush. Yea looks like rich rod really had robinson run on 1st and 2nd then tate throw on 3rd down. What was Tressels in-game adjusments. Lets see here Michigan had 309 total yards and OSU had 318, what exactly did sweater vest adjust to that was so amazing? Turnovers is what killed michigan and last time I checked Rich-Rod can't throw the ball for tate. Forcier lost the game for michigan plain and simple (5 turnovers) and im pretty sure that every turnover was on him (bad passes on the int's and carrying the ball like a loaf of bread on the fumble).

Tressel didn't need to make in-game adjustments. OSU was playing Michigan, it's not as if OSU needed to make too many adjustments.
Then why say that Rich Rod made tress look like a genius with his in-game adjustments? Come on make up your mind which one is it?
Nov 22, 2009 11:36pm
dwccrew's avatar

dwccrew

Not Banned

7,817 posts
Nov 23, 2009 4:39 AM
OldDanTucker wrote: Also you O$U fans want to talk about hype for a qb? Really? What has Pryor done to win a game for you guys yet?
More than Fumblier has. Hell Pryor has more wins over UM as starting QB than the last 3 starting UM QB's combined.
Nov 22, 2009 11:39pm
O

OldDanTucker

Senior Member

283 posts
Nov 23, 2009 4:43 AM
No your run game has more wins and D:)
Nov 22, 2009 11:43pm
dwccrew's avatar

dwccrew

Not Banned

7,817 posts
Nov 23, 2009 4:47 AM
OldDanTucker wrote: No your run game has more wins and D:)
Pryor is not considered apart of the run game? He had 74 rushing yards Saturday.

http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/player/profile?playerId=379070
Nov 22, 2009 11:47pm
O

OldDanTucker

Senior Member

283 posts
Nov 23, 2009 5:03 AM
Take out his 74 yards, do you think O$U still wins?
Nov 23, 2009 12:03am
dwccrew's avatar

dwccrew

Not Banned

7,817 posts
Nov 23, 2009 5:08 AM
OldDanTucker wrote: Take out his 74 yards, do you think O$U still wins?
Of course, but a few of his runs were for 1st downs on 3rd and then set us up for a score. You can discredit him all you like, Pryor was as much a part of this win as anyone.

Selling his fake handoffs, not committing any TO's (the int. was the WR's fault for not catching and tipping it up. It hit him in his hands and was catchable), etc. Pryor did what was needed and what was asked of him to win the game. Hence, he is 2-0 as starting QB against Michigan. He will also have his second Big 10 ring along with that second pair of gold pants.
Nov 23, 2009 12:08am
O

OldDanTucker

Senior Member

283 posts
Nov 23, 2009 5:33 AM
Im not saying he did anything to jeopardize the game, but he sure as hell didn't do anything to help him win the game. Actualy I remeber a couple of times when he was running on 3rd down and if he would have just kept running instead of trying to make a highlight he could have got the first down, then another time he stepped out of bounds about 5 yards short and he could have made it.
Nov 23, 2009 12:33am