I Wear Pants;378778 wrote:Well yeah, but most people criticize Wikipedia as not being a "real" encyclopedia when in many ways it surpasses the other options out there. Especially in the availability and breadth of topics covered as well as it's up to date-ness.
I think that while Google is the most successful of those companies/sites that Wikipedia is the most important one. There were search engines before Google. Never before has there been such a comprehensive and constantly evolving way of obtaining knowledge that was free to all. Especially when you consider it in the context of the Amazon Kindle. It has a web browser with free cellular data. It is basically only good for text and simple images. Wikipedia is this. Wikipedia+Amazon Kindle = real life Hitch Hikers Guide To the Galaxy.
Yeah, I liked what Randy Pausch said in his Last Lecture that after he wrote an article for an encyclopedia he decided that Wikipedia is probably more accurate because it is more peer reviewed.
You're spot on about Wikipedia though. It really is, for the first time, a collection (although a very basic one) of the world's knowledge. Philosophers and artist for years have wondered what it would be like to gather all the knowledge of the universe into one place and Wikipedia is honestly probably the closest we've gotten to doing just that.