According to new Michigan AD.......UM/ND extension is NOT finalized

Home ▸ Archive ▸ College Sports ▸ According to new Michigan AD.......UM/ND extension is NOT finalized
krambman's avatar

krambman

Senior Member

3,606 posts
May 21, 2010 8:27 PM
karen lotz wrote:
Pick6 wrote: lol, notre dame fans complaining that someone wont schedule them...
the one thing i do agree on is that notre dame does have a fanbase all over the country. When I was in LA for the rose bowl, i was at a sports store in a mall and they had usc, ucla, and notre dame merchandise. Same with the pro teams for steelers..san diego, oakland, san fran, and pitt.

btw rock saying someone else cant admit when they are wrong when you cant either. you just come back with who cares????
Who is complaining Michigan won't schedule ND?

The bigger LOL is for the bucknutz who say the 3 Big Ten teams Notre Dame has long standing rivalries with should boycott them in an effort to get them to accept an invitation.
The Big Ten did that once before. It didn't work then, it won't work now. The best way for the Big Ten to strong arm ND into the conference would be to gut the Big East.
May 21, 2010 8:27pm
Pick6's avatar

Pick6

A USA American

14,946 posts
May 22, 2010 11:44 AM
rock_knutne wrote: ^^^^^Who cares what you think, like anything you post is relevant? BTW dumb ass, UM, MSU and Purdue can walk away, ND would have NO problem replacing them!
Didnt think I ever said ND would have a problem with replacing them?
May 22, 2010 11:44am
R

rock_knutne

May 22, 2010 2:11 PM
^^^^^You posted that ND fans are complaining about UM not wanting to play them when that isn't the case. You have ZERO credibility!
May 22, 2010 2:11pm
Pick6's avatar

Pick6

A USA American

14,946 posts
May 22, 2010 2:36 PM
rock_knutne wrote: ^^^^^You posted that ND fans are complaining about UM not wanting to play them when that isn't the case. You have ZERO credibility!
LMAO. What? You arent complaining..then what did you make this thread for!
May 22, 2010 2:36pm
R

rock_knutne

May 22, 2010 5:23 PM
^^^^^You have the brain capacity of a worm! No one's complaining you fool, I posted an article and aked why this isn't official, that's all. I don't want to see this rivalry end but ND doesn't need Michigan or any other Big 10 school if they want to back out. There's plenty of other good programs willing to sign on, ND football and it's popularity will be just fine.
May 22, 2010 5:23pm
S

slingshot4ever

Senior Member

4,085 posts
May 22, 2010 6:51 PM
karen lotz wrote: Notre Dame/Michigan is a bigger game nationally than OSU/Michigan is.
Based on what?
May 22, 2010 6:51pm
karen lotz's avatar

karen lotz

TuTu Train

22,284 posts
May 22, 2010 7:53 PM
slingshot4ever wrote:
karen lotz wrote: Notre Dame/Michigan is a bigger game nationally than OSU/Michigan is.
Based on what?
Based on whatever you want to base it on. People outside of ohio do not care about ohio state.
May 22, 2010 7:53pm
R

rock_knutne

May 22, 2010 8:43 PM
slingshot4ever wrote:
karen lotz wrote: Notre Dame/Michigan is a bigger game nationally than OSU/Michigan is.
Based on what?
For starters, that noon kickoff time doesn't help. You'd think the Big 10 would want to put it's "crowned jewel" on prime time.
May 22, 2010 8:43pm
S

slingshot4ever

Senior Member

4,085 posts
May 23, 2010 10:38 AM
rock_knutne wrote:
slingshot4ever wrote:
karen lotz wrote: Notre Dame/Michigan is a bigger game nationally than OSU/Michigan is.
Based on what?
For starters, that noon kickoff time doesn't help. You'd think the Big 10 would want to put it's "crowned jewel" on prime time.
The Big Ten does not allow November games to be schedule in primetime. You will never see that game scheduled past a 330 start. It has also been a pretty strong tradition for as long as I can remember that the OSU UM game is played at noon. 2006 was the exception because of both teams being undefeated.

Same goes for Texas Oklahoma. That game is almost always played at noon.

Also, the Big Ten doesn't schedule the start times. All dictated by TV networks.
May 23, 2010 10:38am
karen lotz's avatar

karen lotz

TuTu Train

22,284 posts
May 23, 2010 11:51 AM
So, the Big Ten doesn't schedule start times but it does have the power to say no November primetime games? Interesting.
May 23, 2010 11:51am
R

rock_knutne

May 23, 2010 12:20 PM
karen lotz wrote: So, the Big Ten doesn't schedule start times but it does have the power to say no November primetime games? Interesting.
This guy contradicts himself with every post.......ZERO credibility!
May 23, 2010 12:20pm
S

slingshot4ever

Senior Member

4,085 posts
May 23, 2010 12:59 PM
rock_knutne wrote:
karen lotz wrote: So, the Big Ten doesn't schedule start times but it does have the power to say no November primetime games? Interesting.
This guy contradicts himself with every post.......ZERO credibility!
Obviously neither of you understand how game times are decided. The conferences can lay out certain rules that the networks must follow if they really want to have that conferences games on their network. The Big Ten has told all networks that they cannot schedule November games to start in primetime. It is that simple.

So in the end, I did not contradict myself, Big Ten lays out some rules but the networks decide the actual start times.
May 23, 2010 12:59pm
karen lotz's avatar

karen lotz

TuTu Train

22,284 posts
May 23, 2010 1:15 PM
slingshot4ever wrote:
rock_knutne wrote:
karen lotz wrote: So, the Big Ten doesn't schedule start times but it does have the power to say no November primetime games? Interesting.
This guy contradicts himself with every post.......ZERO credibility!
Obviously neither of you understand how game times are decided. The conferences can lay out certain rules that the networks must follow if they really want to have that conferences games on their network. The Big Ten has told all networks that they cannot schedule November games to start in primetime. It is that simple.

So in the end, I did not contradict myself, Big Ten lays out some rules but the networks decide the actual start times.
Thank you for sharing your vast knowledge of how game times are decided. I don't give a fuck. You are a clown.
May 23, 2010 1:15pm
S

slingshot4ever

Senior Member

4,085 posts
May 23, 2010 2:19 PM
Wow, good 5th grade comeback, haha. Next time don't call someone out when you don't even understand the topic being discussed.
May 23, 2010 2:19pm
M

Mr Pat

Senior Member

519 posts
May 23, 2010 3:30 PM
Wow... Good thing we can all be adults.
May 23, 2010 3:30pm
R

rock_knutne

May 23, 2010 3:50 PM
slingshot4ever wrote: Obviously neither of you understand how game times are decided. The conferences can lay out certain rules that the networks must follow if they really want to have that conferences games on their network. The Big Ten has told all networks that they cannot schedule November games to start in primetime. It is that simple.

So in the end, I did not contradict myself, Big Ten lays out some rules but the networks decide the actual start times.
It's obvious you CLEARLY contradicted yourself........you did post this gem, didn't you?
slingshot4ever wrote: The Big Ten does not allow November games to be schedule in primetime. You will never see that game scheduled past a 330 start. It has also been a pretty strong tradition for as long as I can remember that the OSU UM game is played at noon. 2006 was the exception because of both teams being undefeated.

Same goes for Texas Oklahoma. That game is almost always played at noon.

Also, the Big Ten doesn't schedule the start times. All dictated by TV networks.
What's it going to be........the Big 10 controls it or TV? I know, it's what ever is covenient for you to uphold your argument.:rolleyes:
May 23, 2010 3:50pm
B

bigkahuna

Senior Member

4,454 posts
May 23, 2010 5:00 PM
I understand it fine. The Big 10 says here is what you can do.

Ok, so you can't schedule November games in primetime. Ok, well the network dicates when it can be played then. 12,1,2,3,4,5,6.

The Big Ten doesn't schedule the start times, they just say when they can be started. They give the networks a list of when games can be played, and they in turn choose which of those times will work.

It's not that hard.
May 23, 2010 5:00pm
S

slingshot4ever

Senior Member

4,085 posts
May 24, 2010 12:20 AM
^^^
Rock isn't the most intelligent. Give him a couple days to think about it.
May 24, 2010 12:20am
R

rock_knutne

May 24, 2010 7:27 AM
^^^^^Intelligent enough to know an asshole when I see one, and clearly you fit the bill!
May 24, 2010 7:27am
S

slingshot4ever

Senior Member

4,085 posts
May 24, 2010 10:35 PM
That sucks that you have never actually seen me then. I guess you will never know.
May 24, 2010 10:35pm
R

rock_knutne

May 25, 2010 6:50 AM
^^^^Reading your garbage is enough to tell me!
May 25, 2010 6:50am
T

Tiernan

Senior Member

13,021 posts
May 25, 2010 3:39 PM
Rocky Kunt up to his old tricks again...when he clearly doesn't have a clue what he is talking about he just starts calling his intellectual superiors "assholes" or screaming "fuck you all"...etc, etc or he blocks out all contradictory opinions like he does mine. But thanks to other ND dumb asses they reply with my posts attached so my ol' pal Rocky Kunt gets to see how much I've missed his ridiculous diatribes that only reinforce the image of a knuckle dragging, slobbering river rat from Steubenville.
May 25, 2010 3:39pm
M

Mr Pat

Senior Member

519 posts
May 26, 2010 2:37 AM
Umm... OK then!
May 26, 2010 2:37am
S

sjmvsfscs08

Senior Member

2,963 posts
May 26, 2010 2:43 AM
What's funny is that Tiernan's post was just a gigantic ad hominem attack, which he blames "Rocky Kunt" for having referred to. Not exactly proving he's intellectually superior. :s
May 26, 2010 2:43am
R

rock_knutne

May 26, 2010 6:52 AM
^^^^He's really original, isn't he?
May 26, 2010 6:52am