SQ_Crazies wrote: LO is definitely not lucky, he's just playing and not thinking--which I think is his biggest problem. Whenever he tries to do too much he just does nothing and it's weird.

wildcats20 wrote: lol

I don't expect it to be this bad, but Lakers by 12.

SQ_Crazies wrote: Well if I were a big enough douche bag like some other people, I'd think about bringing up the old shit where certain people who have called me out for my predictions gone wrong thought I was an idiot for picking the Lakers to dominate as well. In fact, I think I remember someone saying this would be a GREAT 7 game series and he wanted to pick the Lakers but the Suns have been playing well. Not that that couldn't still happen, but it's funny how that doesn't get brought back to the top isn't it? Especially when it also proves my other point, that it's funny how someone who isn't willing to go out on a limb because they have no balls and they essentially say nothing every time, feels they have the right to call someone out on a prediction that didn't come true. Take notes douche bags, unless you want to still be douche bags.

/rant, you know who you are.

SQ_Crazies wrote: I admitted that I failed, doesn't change that it was still taken way out of context and then no one wanted to believe me when I was asked to explain myself and did just that. But that's fine, I really don't care. It's just getting annoying to see it on every thread like I'm the only one who has been wrong--being lectured by people who tell me it's ok to be wrong sometimes...are you kidding me? I came out and said I was wrong immediately. But my belief that the Cavs were better than the C's was certainly a failure.

Trueblue23 wrote: I've hated Dudley ever since his shit talking days at Boston College