Most Republicans Think Obama Stole Election

Home ▸ Archive ▸ Politics ▸ Most Republicans Think Obama Stole Election
CenterBHSFan's avatar

CenterBHSFan

333 - I'm only half evil

6,115 posts
gobuckeyes,

Sorry, but the democrats in power think that they can spend the way out of it, and that's not a change I can believe in. It doesn't make any sense.
*They ought to know better. If they want to save the day, they need to do drastic spending cuts. There's something different to do if they want to do this country good.
But, I guess that's just happy thoughts that need to be thrown right out the window. We cannot point fingers at one group with one hand, while carrying the torch in another. I am not buying it. Nobody should.
Nov 19, 2009 9:25pm
E

Elliot Stabler

Banned

388 posts
fish82 wrote:
Elliot Stabler wrote: Really Writer.....


Then why is it that in EVERY SINGLE POLL I have seen,

His approval rating is between 50-56%

I think he's doing a good job(not great),and will continue to improve the economy
His average is 50. Two polls have him at 46%...including the one established as the most accurate.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/other/president_obama_job_approval-1044.html
Who established it as the most accurate?? Republicans??

How is it that EVERY OTHER POLL on there reports him having a positive approval rating EXCEPT Fox and Rasmussen?? Hmm....
Nov 19, 2009 11:12pm
A

Altor

Member

62 posts
Elliot Stabler wrote: How is it that EVERY OTHER POLL on there reports him having a positive approval rating EXCEPT Fox and Rasmussen?? Hmm....
Did you notice the "Sample" column? Rasmussen samples likely voters. Fox and Quinnipiac (who also has approval at 48%, though +6 differential) sample registered voters. Everybody else samples adults.

That explains the discrepancy.
Nov 19, 2009 11:39pm
bigdaddy2003's avatar

bigdaddy2003

Senior Member

7,384 posts
You know it's sad to think that there are people who voted for Obama simply because they wanted to make history. I never would have believed it if I didn't hear 4 or 5 people brag about it after he won.

My brother is one of the people who fell for his campaign promises and now he wishes he had his vote back. You know what they say though. Hindsight is 20/20.
Nov 19, 2009 11:50pm
LJ's avatar

LJ

Senior Member

16,351 posts
instead of arguing about it, lets get some links in here with the different poll #'s
Nov 20, 2009 12:06am
I

I Wear Pants

Senior Member

16,223 posts
Here are the final polls (and a handy dandy graph for the whole campaign period) of the 2008 election. During the entire campaign there were very few polls that had Mccain as the preferred candidate and the final polls for all of the sources (which are all the major polling people/networks) had Obama leading.
Nov 20, 2009 12:25am
fish82's avatar

fish82

Senior Member

4,111 posts
Elliot Stabler wrote:
fish82 wrote:
Elliot Stabler wrote: Really Writer.....


Then why is it that in EVERY SINGLE POLL I have seen,

His approval rating is between 50-56%

I think he's doing a good job(not great),and will continue to improve the economy
His average is 50. Two polls have him at 46%...including the one established as the most accurate.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/other/president_obama_job_approval-1044.html
Who established it as the most accurate?? Republicans??

How is it that EVERY OTHER POLL on there reports him having a positive approval rating EXCEPT Fox and Rasmussen?? Hmm....
Dude, seriously. :rolleyes:

And you probably missed the point over the summer where FOX had him at 57-59%, often 5-6 points above everybody else.
Nov 20, 2009 7:12am
C

cbus4life

Ignorant

2,849 posts
The whole "only racists and the clueless" voted for Obama is the biggest effing cop out in the world.
Nov 20, 2009 9:06am
W

wizecracker

Senior Member

139 posts
derek bomar wrote:
Cleveland Buck wrote: I'm sure ACORN played a role, but probably not enough to make up the entire difference in votes.
prove it
Disprove it. Damn I'm full of well thought out arguments.
Nov 20, 2009 9:24am
derek bomar's avatar

derek bomar

Senior Member

3,722 posts
wizecracker wrote:
derek bomar wrote:
Cleveland Buck wrote: I'm sure ACORN played a role, but probably not enough to make up the entire difference in votes.
prove it
Disprove it. Damn I'm full of well thought out arguments.
not really...since it's kind of hard to disprove a negative (can't disprove something where there's no actual "proof" of the thing I am trying to disprove)
Nov 20, 2009 3:05pm
believer's avatar

believer

Senior Member

8,153 posts
Gobuckeyes1 wrote:Please stop with the "only idiots and racists voted for Obama" bullshit.

If your views are indicative of the average Republican, no wonder you guys can't win an election. People are getting just a little tired of being talked down to and preached to by the Republicans who think they friggin' know it all. Your boys had six years of total control to fix everything that was wrong with our country according to them. Your party failed, and the voters went a different direction.
When someone's panties get in a wad that rapidly, it says (a) we've struck a nerve and (b) we must be dangerously close to the truth.

By the way "our boys" failed because they spent like Democrats.

The voters have lost their way.
Nov 20, 2009 4:49pm
E

Elliot Stabler

Banned

388 posts
Please explain how we've "lost our way"
Nov 20, 2009 5:17pm
believer's avatar

believer

Senior Member

8,153 posts
^^^Socialism is not Change We Can Believe In.
Nov 20, 2009 7:50pm
E

Elliot Stabler

Banned

388 posts
believer...

Do you even know what the true meaning of socialism is???

If you did...you would know that President Obama is far from being a socialist
Nov 20, 2009 8:54pm
fish82's avatar

fish82

Senior Member

4,111 posts
Elliot Stabler wrote: believer...

Do you even know what the true meaning of socialism is???

If you did...you would know that President Obama is far from being a socialist

True. "Radical Liberal" works well for me. Also, He is now below 50% in another poll you might be familiar with.

http://www.gallup.com/Home.aspx
Nov 20, 2009 9:13pm
E

Elliot Stabler

Banned

388 posts
http://politicalwire.com/

Putting news of President Obama's approval rate dipping below 50% in perspective, USA Today runs an excellent interactive chart plotting presidential approval rates since 1945.

When comparing various presidents to each other, as of right now, President Obama most closely tracks Ronald Reagan.

Hmm...
Nov 20, 2009 9:51pm
M

Manhattan Buckeye

Senior Member

7,566 posts
I already reamed you once on this thread with that godawful initial claim and stupid "question" by the "pollsters".

I do like the Hmm, though. Barack, Obama, hmm hmm hmm, unemployment is here to stay!
Nov 21, 2009 1:06am
believer's avatar

believer

Senior Member

8,153 posts
Elliot Stabler wrote:http://politicalwire.com/

Putting news of President Obama's approval rate dipping below 50% in perspective, USA Today runs an excellent interactive chart plotting presidential approval rates since 1945.

When comparing various presidents to each other, as of right now, President Obama most closely tracks Ronald Reagan.

Hmm...
Obama is no Reagan.
Nov 21, 2009 3:58am
fish82's avatar

fish82

Senior Member

4,111 posts
Elliot Stabler wrote: http://politicalwire.com/

Putting news of President Obama's approval rate dipping below 50% in perspective, USA Today runs an excellent interactive chart plotting presidential approval rates since 1945.

When comparing various presidents to each other, as of right now, President Obama most closely tracks Ronald Reagan.

Hmm...
Except for the constant girl-like whining about "my predecessor" and "we inherited," yeah....he's totally Reaganesque. :rolleyes:

Cool tangent though.
Nov 21, 2009 7:24am
LJ's avatar

LJ

Senior Member

16,351 posts
I cleaned this thread up a little bit. Let's keep things less personal.
Nov 21, 2009 4:11pm
C

cbus4life

Ignorant

2,849 posts
Obama is Muhammad, Reagan is Jesus.
Nov 22, 2009 3:00pm
Cleveland Buck's avatar

Cleveland Buck

Troll Hunter

5,126 posts
Elections aren't all they are stealing in Washington.
Nov 22, 2009 3:20pm
believer's avatar

believer

Senior Member

8,153 posts
cbus4life wrote: Obama is Muhammad, Reagan is Jesus.

NAW. Reagan is The Gipper. Obama is the Anointed One.
Nov 22, 2009 4:01pm
RoyalNut's avatar

RoyalNut

Senior Member

175 posts
derek bomar wrote:
Cleveland Buck wrote: I'm sure ACORN played a role, but probably not enough to make up the entire difference in votes.
prove it
Prove it!
I love you liberals, you care not how far the rules are bent or even obliterated in some cases to further what you feel to be for the better good.

My question to you would be this, rather then having to prove something that is almost nothing more then common knowledge to anyone that payed even the slightest attention to this election. Please tell me how you believe they did not have a roll in Obama's election?

This I gotta hear!

But you will not answer me, because you can't!
Nov 23, 2009 4:47pm
RoyalNut's avatar

RoyalNut

Senior Member

175 posts
still waiting on that answer
Nov 24, 2009 9:25am