Browns vs Lions

Home Archive Pro Sports Browns vs Lions
M

mhs95_06

Senior Member

8,167 posts
Nov 22, 2009 4:44 PM
Does the NFL even have a rule that says what to do for the case in which the clock runs out on a play in which both there is a defensive foul which gives an untimed play and an offensive injury when the offensive team doesn't have any time outs left and there is no time left on the clock? If the NFL doesn't have a specific rule for that you'd think they might after this! What would it be? Would it nullify the opportunity for an untimed play?

Is the bone of contention, that you all are saying the Browns got hosed with the game result, the fact that they let Stafford back in the game for the game winning TD play, or the interderence call? It will probably be his last play of the season, and if it is it will be a very memorable one for him!
Nov 22, 2009 4:44pm
G

George Costanza

Senior Member

120 posts
Nov 22, 2009 4:44 PM
Cleveland has several legit grips on that final drive.
Nov 22, 2009 4:44pm
wes_mantooth's avatar

wes_mantooth

Tomfoolery & shenanigans

17,977 posts
Nov 22, 2009 4:44 PM
Yeah.....Bruce will probably blow an O ring tonight.
Nov 22, 2009 4:44pm
se-alum's avatar

se-alum

The Biggest Boss

13,948 posts
Nov 22, 2009 4:46 PM
I agree that there is no way you can judge Quinn based on today. However, Mangini may have set this team back another year by playing DA. Quinn has had as many starts as Stafford has, which is not enough time to judge a QB.
Nov 22, 2009 4:46pm
C

charliehustle14

Senior Member

2,224 posts
Nov 22, 2009 4:48 PM
Yeah I've never seen PI called on a last second 'punt' throw, either. That ball was lobbed 40 yards straight up into the air with about 5 or 6 players waiting on it to come down.
Nov 22, 2009 4:48pm
Cleveland Buck's avatar

Cleveland Buck

Troll Hunter

5,126 posts
Nov 22, 2009 4:48 PM
When the Lions marched down field like a hot knife through butter to make it 24-10 I knew we had no chance to win. Terrible officiating at the end, but whatever. No matter what they still got one more play and there was no way we were stopping it.

This is the first game that they let Quinn play. We don't really know anything about him yet. He played very well, and if he plays well the rest of the season then he might be a long term answer if we can put some talent around him.
Nov 22, 2009 4:48pm
chicago510's avatar

chicago510

Original Chatterer

5,728 posts
Nov 22, 2009 4:48 PM
Fab4Runner wrote:
chicago510 wrote: Can't wait to hear Bruce on STO tonight.

Not a Cleveland fan at all, but hearing Browns fan vent is one of my forms of entertainment.
This is legit bitching. No way pass interference should have been called and no way should a 4th timeout have been called. Unreal.
No I agree. Browns fans are passionate and intelligent (most) and most of their gripes on the show are legitimate. But the Browns suck so much that it's still entertaining.
Nov 22, 2009 4:48pm
M

mhs95_06

Senior Member

8,167 posts
Nov 22, 2009 4:53 PM
charliehustle14 wrote: Yeah I've never seen PI called on a last second 'punt' throw, either. That ball was lobbed 40 yards straight up into the air with about 5 or 6 players waiting on it to come down.
Maybe other teams defensive players are smarter than the Browns'. Just because you usually don't see PI called on "hail marys" doesn't mean it shouldn't be called if it happens! Just because you don't see NBA officials call fouls in the last 3 seconds, doesn't mean it's not the right thing to do!
Nov 22, 2009 4:53pm
SportsAndLady's avatar

SportsAndLady

Senior Member

35,632 posts
Nov 22, 2009 4:55 PM
Skyhook79 wrote: "Brady Quinn plays much better than DA could ever play."

I guess you didn't watch any of the 2007 season or the Giants game last year????
DAQ had games just like this too against better competition also.

Both are bad and if your judging Quinn based on this game, I question your football IQ.
DA also had Braylon Edwards and Kellen Winslow and Joe Jurevicous.

Brady has............
Nov 22, 2009 4:55pm
Strapping Young Lad's avatar

Strapping Young Lad

Senior Member

2,453 posts
Nov 22, 2009 5:01 PM
Unbelievable ending...the Browns snatching defeat from the jaws of victory. At least this won't hurt your chances of a top 5 pick.
Nov 22, 2009 5:01pm
D

Dr Jones

Member

52 posts
Nov 22, 2009 5:14 PM
Being a lions fan I am happy as hell for the win...... But these were the two WORST defensive team I have ever seen.....Oh well hope stafford is OK just means clevland will pick before detroit...
prob Cleveland #1 Detroit # 2....lol
Nov 22, 2009 5:14pm
se-alum's avatar

se-alum

The Biggest Boss

13,948 posts
Nov 22, 2009 5:18 PM
But these were the two WORST defensive team I have ever seen
I don't know about the Lions, but the Browns have really been hurt by injuries. They were serviceable the first part of the year, until they got worn out of course.
Nov 22, 2009 5:18pm
darbypitcher22's avatar

darbypitcher22

Senior Member

8,000 posts
Nov 22, 2009 5:20 PM
I thought there was supposed to be a runoff if you have no Timeouts left... meaning time would have run off and Detroit wouldn't have been able to snap the ball...
Nov 22, 2009 5:20pm
I

I drain 3's

Senior Member

574 posts
Nov 22, 2009 5:22 PM
While I agree that they probably should have never called the pass interference, the players should have never put themselves in a position for the ref to make a call like that. One dude tackled I believe Calvin Johnson before the ball got there, and another pushed a different receiver out of the back of the endzone while face guarding them. Where in the hell did any of them ever learn to do something like that? Never put yourself in a position for a referee to decide the outcome of a game, or things like this will happen.
Nov 22, 2009 5:22pm
KnightXC1's avatar

KnightXC1

Captain Charisma

1,031 posts
Nov 22, 2009 5:24 PM
^^ A runoff for what? They spiked the ball with 8 seconds and ran a play.

It may have been ugly but that was an entertaining game. I feel so bad for Browns fans right now as they just can't catch a break on anything. It was a good call in the endzone though since Calvin did get undercut. I hope Stafford is alright but by the looks of things I won't be surprised at all if he broke his clavicle or seperated his shoulder. Only the Lions could be happy about doubling their win total with this game but I will take it.
Nov 22, 2009 5:24pm
E

equus

Member

60 posts
Nov 22, 2009 5:27 PM
I saw a Lions fan holding a sign, and I have adopted it for my new mantra:

1-9
Still My Team

I am a glutton for punishment...
Nov 22, 2009 5:27pm
I

I drain 3's

Senior Member

574 posts
Nov 22, 2009 5:28 PM
Also, if you look at the play-by-play according to ESPN, it was Cleveland that called a timeout, not Detroit, thus allowing Stafford to come back in and no run off.

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/playbyplay?gameId=291122008&period=4
Nov 22, 2009 5:28pm
ricola's avatar

ricola

Senior Member

855 posts
Nov 22, 2009 5:29 PM
another good reason for the Browns to lose...the more losses they have, they better chance mangenius won't be around next year.
Nov 22, 2009 5:29pm
KnightXC1's avatar

KnightXC1

Captain Charisma

1,031 posts
Nov 22, 2009 5:30 PM
The last timeout was called by the Browns, not the Lions so their is no reason to be upset with the officials. Calvin was clearly interfered with in the endzone and Stafford was allowed to come back out for the final play because the Browns called timeout.
Nov 22, 2009 5:30pm
Jughead's avatar

Jughead

Senior Member

1,261 posts
Nov 22, 2009 5:47 PM
Why the hell would the Browns call a timeout? That just seems like the NFL trying to cover up their mistakes.

I don't care about the Browns or any NFL team one bit. I just despise officiating that changes the outcome of a ballgame.
Nov 22, 2009 5:47pm
lhslep134's avatar

lhslep134

why so serious?

9,774 posts
Nov 22, 2009 5:48 PM
bo shemmy3337 wrote:
lhslep134 wrote: Browns lose assuring a higher draft pick.


Brady Quinn plays much better than DA could ever play.


Seems like a win-win to me. We can no longer worry about drafting McCoy or another overrated quarterback (we don't need more than one). Now we can draft a defensive player.

I've already given up hope for this season, and this is the best thing that could have happened in my opinion.


So you are sold on Quinn because he had a good day against the Lions?
If you read my post, I also go on to say that BQ is overrated as well.

That being said, of course you can't just be sold after 1 game.

But, I am sold on the fact that the Browns can now, as a team, rally around Quinn and hopefully drive DA out of town.

Skyhook: Yes I watched DA in 2007. And if you watched him too, you'd also realize he led the league in interception/sack ratio and was last in the league in not only completion percentage but also completion percentage on <15 yard routes.

So yes, I watched DA, and yes he's worse than Brady.

Any other questions skyhook? You going to question my football IQ? Because yours is extremely shoddy if you think DA had anything more than a decent year in 2007. 29 TDs is nice, but not last in the league in completion % and INT/sack ratio.
Nov 22, 2009 5:48pm
B

bigyellowmaker12

Junior Member

1 posts
Nov 22, 2009 5:50 PM
At least they Browns are still in contention for the #1 overall draft pick.
Nov 22, 2009 5:50pm
KnightXC1's avatar

KnightXC1

Captain Charisma

1,031 posts
Nov 22, 2009 5:55 PM
Jughead - The Lions were at the line of scrimmage for the final play at the 1 yard line when the Browns called timeout, most likely because they saw how the Lions were set up and wanted to have the right play in place. There is no conspiracy at the end of the game, Stafford got off to the sidelines after the play without a stoppage, the PI call was correct, and the Browns called the last timeout.
Nov 22, 2009 5:55pm
krazie45's avatar

krazie45

Senior Member

1,055 posts
Nov 22, 2009 6:00 PM
I disagree, the PI call was not correct. The ball was nowhere near the "interfered" receiver and was intercepted a good 8 yards in front of him. Plus you could call that on every last second lob ever, because everyone always goes up fighting for the ball. It was a bad call at that stage of the game.
Nov 22, 2009 6:00pm
M

mhs95_06

Senior Member

8,167 posts
Nov 22, 2009 6:17 PM
krazie45 wrote: I disagree, the PI call was not correct. The ball was nowhere near the "interfered" receiver and was intercepted a good 8 yards in front of him. Plus you could call that on every last second lob ever, because everyone always goes up fighting for the ball. It was a bad call at that stage of the game.
Yes, and if not interfered with could have made it that 8 yards before the ball came down!
Nov 22, 2009 6:17pm