Commander of Awesome;1869362 wrote:From link:




Oh?




Seems to be quite reputable and an even playing field. When confronted with the facts, and unable to find a reputable claim that Mother Jones/Huffington POstNYT/Etc.. They can't be solid sources bc they lean in a direction that you don't like. I get attacked for copying stories from reputable source, and intelligent posts on the subject, and then said I won't take a right leaning news outlet series. Based on......? If you can find one that is known for solid journalism, I'd be happy to read it. DO that instead of whining for fuck's sake. You're crying bc you're butthurt.



Ahhh, moving the goalposts. "No I didn't mean award winning news outlet, I meant specific journalist!" lolk dude, whatever makes you feel better lil guy.


You make it too easy. The best way to get your point across is to find a reputable right leaning news outlet. Shouldn't be difficult for you to find at least one.

Commander of useful idiot;1869363 wrote:Back on topic:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/right-turn/wp/2017/08/29/what-more-proof-of-a-secret-russian-connection-do-we-need/?tid=ss_mail&utm_term=.c4098a5d55d0

"What more proof of a secret Russian connection do we need?"

I would like to know this as well. Directly lied about ties with Russia, cronies lied about it, caught red handed.....what are we waiting on?

HitsRus;1869370 wrote:Wow ... as I typed my last post about not one prominent democrat came out against "Antifa" and their violent, anarchistic actions, Nancy Pelosi of all people, issued a formal statement condemning the group and their actions at Berkeley....
Thank you.

like_that;1869366 wrote:COA once again posts another op-ed, because he can't come up with his own thoughts LOL.

like_that;1869365 wrote:As I previously asked, is ESPN now a credible source to you all of a sudden? Also you are a dense fuck. All i said is if you can't take people seriously for posting certain sources, how can you expect anyone to take you seriously for posting certain far left leaning sources? For fucks sake how can you not realize that makes you a dumb fuck hypocrite? Grow up.

Go ahead and take a poll to see how many people think mother jones, salon, and reddit posts are credible. I'm sure you won't because you know the response. Nothing funnier on this site than the fake internet tough guy act from COA. It brings the lulz that you actually believe you are the smartest and toughest person on this site and then all you do is post op-eds as your own thoughts.

HitsRus;1869370 wrote:Wow ... as I typed my last post about not one prominent democrat came out against "Antifa" and their violent, anarchistic actions, Nancy Pelosi of all people, issued a formal statement condemning the group and their actions at Berkeley....
Thank you.

Commander of Awesome;1869372 wrote:Since when did posting an op-ed become a taboo thing? What stupid criteria are you basing this on? Like_that's inner thoughts, "Op-ed doesn't agree with me, and COA just pwned me, so I'm going to pathetically grasp at straws!"

Commander of Awesome;1869375 wrote:How long until like_that resorts to another "FAKE NEWS" or "LEFT SIDED LIBERAL AGENDA!" as his only defense? I'm guessing his next post.

Commander of Awesome;1869373 wrote:Since 1997 ESPN has been able to produce one thing (probably either OSTL or 30:30) that was worth a peabody award. Fox News? NADA

Says more about your favorite news site than it does about ESPN. Any other fails?

http://www.democraticleader.gov/newsroom/82917/

like_that;1869379 wrote:I don't watch or read Fox News. The whole point of bringing up Fox was to prove winning awards doesn't mean shit. You even bitch about certain actors/actresses/movies winning the academy awards. Just another example of COA deciding when an argument is allowed to be applied.

Commander of Awesome;1869387 wrote:Bah fake news! [insert over used political insult such as libatard that someone else thought of]

like_that in a nutshell

Commander of Awesome;1869390 wrote:Right on cue, lol too easy.

Commander of Awesome;1869393 wrote:like_that, will you condemn Trump's pick to police for-profit college fraud spent who spent the majority of career at the biggest for-profit college fraud?

• Chris Murphy‏Verified account @ChrisMurphyCT 3m3 minutes ago
  
  
  
  
  Replying to @ChrisMurphyCT
  6/ Result will be fraud, tuition, student debt, and investor returns go UP. Quality goes DOWN. That is current trajectory of DeVos legacy.
  
  0 replies 5 retweets 2 likes
• 
  Chris Murphy‏Verified account @ChrisMurphyCT 5m5 minutes ago
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  Replying to @ChrisMurphyCT
  5/ Dept of Ed is turning into a simple pass through agent for federal education aid to get as quickly as possible to Wall Street investors.
  
  0 replies 10 retweets 13 likes
• 
  Chris Murphy‏Verified account @ChrisMurphyCT 8m8 minutes ago
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  Replying to @ChrisMurphyCT
  4/ Signal to her for-profit ed crowd that they can restart biz model of monetizing Pell grants/Stafford loans into big investor returns.
  
  5 replies 40 retweets 72 likes
• 
  Chris Murphy‏Verified account @ChrisMurphyCT 10m10 minutes ago
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  Replying to @ChrisMurphyCT
  3/ Now DeVos puts a person in charge of for-profit college fraud a guy who worked for one of the biggest for-profit scammers, DeVry.
  
  11 replies 118 retweets 219 likes
• 
  Chris Murphy‏Verified account @ChrisMurphyCT 12m12 minutes ago
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  Replying to @ChrisMurphyCT
  2/ DeVos's 1st proposal is to send federal elementary/secondary funding to private schools...the for-profit ones run by her friends.
  
  13 replies 190 retweets 266 likes
• 
  Chris Murphy‏Verified account @ChrisMurphyCT 17m17 minutes ago
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  Follow what's going on at the Dept of Education. 1/ Betsy DeVos takes over. Her family and friends made lots of $ in for-profit education.