QuakerOats;1739106 wrote:So Trump makes a non-pc comment regarding some Mexicans who are here and are criminals, and the whole PC left and Republican Establishment, Marco Rubio, Jeb Bush, Mitt Romney and co. goes crazy. Where is the one reporter in the world who will go up to these libtards and state some facts regarding the real criminality of many of these illegals and ask them, seriously, what do you think about this crime and what should we do about it. Instead we will get the moronic reporting we always get and no one will address the real problem. BTW, Trump got his poster boy in San Fran for what he was talking about.

QuakerOats;1739111 wrote:http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/07/06/two-previously-deported-illegal-immigrants-allegedly-murder-two-women-in-two-states-in-24-hours/


Answer: label Trump as a baffoon; circle the PC wagons; do nothing of substance; the problem worsens; America loses. Thank God for libtards and the eventual republican nominee saying the same thing that I will later support as the savior of our country from marxists.

QuakerOats;1739106 wrote:So Trump makes a non-pc comment regarding some Mexicans who are here and are criminals, and the whole PC left goes crazy. Where is the one reporter in the world who will go up to these libtards and state some facts regarding the real criminality of many of these illegals and ask them, seriously, what do you think about this crime and what should we do about it. Instead we will get the moronic reporting we always get and no one will address the real problem. BTW, Trump got his poster boy in San Fran for what he was talking about.

BoatShoes;1739112 wrote:Fixed that for you.

gut;1739116 wrote:The problem is he delivered it with typical Trump bravado. I don't think the guy, with his relatively limited vocabulary, is capable of speaking in measured, non-inflammatory terms.

He certainly could have made the point about the crime and other problems stemming from illegal immigration, but most are hard-working people just wanting better opportunities. And, yes, most are willing to do jobs that are "beneath" most Americans.

It's really unfortunate Trump delivered the comments in the manner he did, because it COULD have been an opportunity to have a difficult discussion few other politicians are willing to have. The simple reality is we can't further burden our entitlement programs legalizing a bunch of minimum wage migrants. And we know how this will play out - once they're legalized, there will be a push to vote. And once they can vote, those votes will be for sale for handouts.

like_that;1739138 wrote:I agree with the bravado, but let's be real here with your last paragraph. This country only worries about the feelz of everyone these days. You actually think if Donald toned down his comments, that people would still be willing to have a legitimate convo about illegal immigrants? You're better than that.

Spock;1739336 wrote: HC doesnt want to debate Donald or Chris Christie because they wont let her get away with her usual BS. THey will get her all fired up and she will sink her own ship.

like_that;1739438 wrote:At the very least he is distracting the media from running their smear campaigns on the other candidates. So, keep being you Donald!

Spock;1739336 wrote:obviously he is making alot of noise. MSNBC wont shut up about him. When they are covering someone that much then that means they are threatening to Hilary.

HC doesnt want to debate Donald or Chris Christie because they wont let her get away with her usual BS. THey will get her all fired up and she will sink her own ship.

like_that;1739438 wrote:At the very least he is distracting the media from running their smear campaigns on the other candidates. So, keep being you Donald!

gut;1739351 wrote:I'd add Paul to that list, and possibly Ted Cruz...problem is I think both Trump and Cruz are idiots that Hillary would run circles around in a debate.

But Hillary will only have to debate 1 Repub, and it sure as hell won't be Trump. And since she somehow continues to get away with not fielding questions from the media, not much will come up until she's forced to answer questions in the primary debates....but I'm guessing friendly moderators will mostly serve-up softballs.

QuakerOats;1739559 wrote:Cruz is an Ivy League debate champion and would destroy Clinton; she has nothing to run on, unless a disastrous record and criminality remain in vogue.

believer;1739661 wrote:Cruz would destroy Clinton in a debate. But it doesn't matter. Hillary Clinton could walk on the stage, stab Cruz with a knife in front of millions of viewers, turn around to face the camera, and deny that she did it. 50% of the population would still vote for her.

Bottom-line is the "race" will be between Hillary "I'm A Corrupt Liar" Clinton and Jeb "Yet Another Common-Core" Bush...and a handful of third-party candidates who don't have a chance.

So we will once again face the prospect of wasting our votes on a sure loser or picking the lesser of two evils just like we have the last several presidential elections.

This country is FUBAR.

rmolin73;1738937 wrote:There you have it. If steubbigred doesn't know batshit crazy then who does?

steubbigred;1740540 wrote:Is that right? I voted for your man two times. I assume you voted for Obama. Yes that's right . I like Trump. I am sick of all the lying bullshit from both sides of the isle . This man cares and will not let special interest run the politics if he is elected. you do not want to debate me .