He hurt his ankle. If cincy was afraid he couldn't play they'd cut the ties, not try to keep him. He'll be fine.shook_17;1589901 wrote:How is Hawkins missing 10 games irrelevant? He can't stay healthy he's 5'7 and weighs 180.
Does Edlemen have a history of missing games? Or nahhhhhhhZWICK 4 PREZ;1589909 wrote:He hurt his ankle. If cincy was afraid he couldn't play they'd cut the ties, not try to keep him. He'll be fine.
Or are you suggesting Edelman is immune for hurting his ankle? Or you're just using your crystal ball again?
shook_17;1589894 wrote:Right he has showed that in his three year career in cincy. With a whooping 900 yards and four touchdowns. Very impressive please be our slot guy. Love a guy that averages just over one touchdown a year. And is very durable.
/ sarcasm
shook_17;1589901 wrote:How is Hawkins missing 10 games irrelevant? He can't stay healthy he's 5'7 and weighs 180.
shook_17;1589906 wrote:I'm posting facts you're posting nonsense. Next
shook_17;1589918 wrote:Does Edlemen have a history of missing games? Or nahhhhhhh
So that means he never will. He's got joints of steel. You're an idiot. Hawkins is fine and is a better option.shook_17;1589918 wrote:Does Edlemen have a history of missing games? Or nahhhhhhh
ZWICK 4 PREZ;1589922 wrote:So that means he never will. He's got joints of steel. You're an idiot. Hawkins is fine and is a better option.
I didn't know how many games Edelman missed b.c I didn't care. He's playing and it wasnt anything serious. Same reason I don't care how many games Hawkins missed. He's fine and it wasn't anytthing serious. No one knows what the future holds for either of the two. I'll take the one whos got more skill.Dr. KnOiTaLL;1589926 wrote:The nature of the slot position is running short routes and going across the middle of the field where you are going to take shots from linebackers and downhill safeties. This position in general is not durable.
Wow, I kind of brought that conversation to a halt! lol
Agreed. And fwiw I'd be fine with Edelman.. he's tough too.. I prefer Hawkins though.shook_17;1589973 wrote:Hawkins is not a better option. Just stop. Agree to disagree
Yes, he does.shook_17;1589918 wrote:Does Edlemen have a history of missing games? Or nahhhhhhh
Actually he's only missed 12Dr. KnOiTaLL;1589921 wrote:
I honestly would be happy with both. I just thought that I would add in some more facts...
Prior to 2013, Julian Edelman had missed 16 games in his 4 year career (never playing a full 16 games). Over those 4 years, he amassed 69 receptions, 714 yards, and 4 TDs.
Just saying, Edelman and Hawkins aren't as different as you are making them out to be. You're welcome
Bro, if you're gonna throw stats out, should probably do some research.shook_17;1589894 wrote:Right he has showed that in his three year career in cincy. With a whooping 900 yards and four touchdowns. Very impressive please be our slot guy. Love a guy that averages just over one touchdown a year. And is very durable.
/ sarcasm
Regardless he just destroyed your stats/injury argument against Hawkins.shook_17;1590012 wrote:Actually he's only missed 12
HighRoller74;1590020 wrote:Regardless he just destroyed your stats/injury argument against Hawkins.
HighRoller74;1590020 wrote:Regardless he just destroyed your stats/injury argument against Hawkins.
Only if you factor in his one hit wonder season.shook_17;1590031 wrote:Well not really stats. Edelmans production is way higher than Hawkins. Just the injury. Oups
D'Qwell Jackson, LB, Indianapolis ColtsFour years, $22 million, $11 million guaranteed
This move is all about what you could have had. There isn't much doubt that Jackson is an upgrade for the Colts -- that's how bad their inside linebacker situation has been -- but when you consider what the Browns were able to replace him with, you get a sense of where the Colts should have put their money instead. Karlos Dansby may be a couple of years older than Jackson, but he is playing at a completely different level and signed for just a bit more money.
While Jackson struggled last season on his way to a PFF grade of minus-11.6, Dansby was right up among the best inside linebackers in the league at plus-13.3 thanks in part to his big plays like eight sacks and four interceptions. Dansby made 44 more defensive stops than Jackson, and opposing quarterbacks completed a lower percentage of passes into his coverage (65 percent versus 73.3 percent for Jackson) for a lower passer rating (75 to 91.3). The Colts were correct to upgrade at linebacker; they just chose the wrong guy to do it.
Can you lost the link for that. I need to use that for some dumbasslhslep134;1590077 wrote:From PFF on ESPN.com talking about FA signings that made no sense
It's Insider...Midstate01;1590082 wrote:Can you lost the link for that. I need to use that for some dumbass
Damnit!lhslep134;1590089 wrote:It's Insider...
http://insider.espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/10597325/2014-nfl-free-agency-aqib-talib-contract-early-deals-make-no-sense
