Obviously!!dlazz;1589788 wrote:LOL, u guys mad?
Or you could just answer my question? If you just bought a business, and you were unhappy with an employees performance, are you going to keep that employee around? Yes, or no?dlazz;1589788 wrote:LOL, u guys mad?
The Bengals will match. I also see them locking down Burfict and AJ. Congtats to the Browns for at least makinng the Bungles com off the cash.SportsAndLady;1589785 wrote:Hawkins signed the offer sheet from Cleveland, bengals have 5 days to match.
Browns still going after Edelman hard.
The best part is that I hit it right on the head and was right. Sucks to suck. How about you and Zwick go lick each other's assholesdlazz;1589720 wrote:Who cares? Next year it will be the same shit. 4-12 after three years chud will be fired along with banner and Lombardi then we will switch back to the 4-3.
Saw this. Not a fan of this guy. I'd rather have Edlemen over HawkinsCommander of Awesome;1589815 wrote:RT @AlbertBreer B/c of structure of Hawkins' now-signed offer sheet with Browns, I'm told Bengals rethought things, now unlikely to match
I wouldn't. You can replicate slot receiver skills (route running, catching in traffic, etc.) You can't replicate Hawkins' explosiveness.shook_17;1589818 wrote:Saw this. Not a fan of this guy. I'd rather have Edlemen over Hawkins
I'd also rather have Edlemen.shook_17;1589818 wrote:Saw this. Not a fan of this guy. I'd rather have Edlemen over Hawkins
It's going to happensleeper;1589829 wrote:I'd also rather have Edlemen.
Look, as long as this regime doesn't draft freaking Manziel with the #4 pick I'll be happy
Benjamin isn't and won't ever be a slot reciever. He's a return specialist and that's all he'll ever be...so that point is moot on his speed.shook_17;1589853 wrote:Right Hawkins only has 4 career touchdown catches, has missed 10 of his last 32 games, we have his speed in benjiman. Edlemen is a product of his system yup. Because he runs good routes, has great hands and only dropped 8 balls out of 157 targets. But Hawkins is way better
Well I'm glad you have a crystal ball and can tell who's playing and not in the future. Dumbshook_17;1589882 wrote:Oh and Hawkins only has 900 yards receiving over his three seasons and I think you missed the big point he has missed 10 out of his 32 games. Really reliable he iS
Duuuude he's missed 10 games!!! And benjamin is fast!!!!se-alum;1589886 wrote:Rather see the Bengals match Hawkins, and then sign Edelman.
Huh, I don't want Hawkins, I want Edelman. It's possible for guys to leave NE and still be good. Woodhead had a really nice year in SD, after leaving NE.ZWICK 4 PREZ;1589888 wrote:Duuuude he's missed 10 games!!! And benjamin is fast!!!!
I know. I was posting irrelevant stuff. I thought that was the theme.se-alum;1589889 wrote:Huh, I don't want Hawkins, I want Edelman. It's possible for guys to leave NE and still be good. Woodhead had a really nice year in SD, after leaving NE.
How is Hawkins missing 10 games irrelevant? He can't stay healthy he's 5'7 and weighs 180.ZWICK 4 PREZ;1589890 wrote:I know. I was posting irrelevant stuff. I thought that was the theme.
you're hopeless. Plain and simple.shook_17;1589894 wrote:Right he has showed that in his three year career in cincy. With a whooping 900 yards and four touchdowns. Very impressive please be our slot guy. Love a guy that averages just over one touchdown a year. And is very durable.
/ sarcasm
Actually, it isn't a yes or no question. It's not like he inherited the guy.GoChiefs;1589794 wrote:Or you could just answer my question? If you just bought a business, and you were unhappy with an employees performance, are you going to keep that employee around? Yes, or no?
