like_that;1643773 wrote:You trade your shittiest d lineman if you have depth and Phil Taylor isn't the worst. Andre Johnson is 33 and currently sidelined with a hammy. I would lol at their face of they asked for Phil Taylor to be included with our starting QB. I rather judge Phil off all the positives reviews I heard about him + his numbers last year instead of one fucking preseason game. Come on br, we ain't winning a SB this year. Why the fuck would you trade your best DT for an aging injury prone wr? That's beyond idiotic.

Rotinaj;1643775 wrote:Isn't Andre Johnson hurt all the time too?

Commander of Awesome;1643772 wrote:GM that doesn't go to games, brought teh lulz.

BR1986FB;1643769 wrote:And I'm glad you're not a GM either. Otherwise, we'd have an unhappy Andrew Wiggins.

And you're reaching referring to Taylor as a "stud." He's good but not great. Again, another Cleveland fan overvaluing "ok" talent.

Commander of Awesome;1643777 wrote:Yeah but he had a good yr 8 seasons ago.

BR1986FB;1643778 wrote:Johnson put up 1400 yards last year, 1600 the year before. He still has 3-5 good years left in him.

Commander of Awesome;1643777 wrote:Yeah but he had a good yr 8 seasons ago.

Commander of Awesome;1643783 wrote:He does? How many good 38 yr old WRs are there?

Also guess how many 10+ TD seasons he's had?

Spoiler: Same amount of games you've been to. 0

BR1986FB;1643786 wrote:Aww, bitch boy's got nothing so he's gotta go to the "you haven't been to any games."

BTW...how was the Pride Parade?

like_that;1643793 wrote:You're going full retard now.

Not sure why anyone would trade PT when he is on his rookie contract for an aging WR who is always hurt. Not to mention we would already be giving up our QB.

Is PT just a name you threw out or did you read this somewhere? I can't imagine the FO being that dumb.

Commander of Awesome;1643774 wrote:Bc he's a fucking stud elite run stuffing wrecking ball on a nice rookie contract. Who wouldn't want that? Guess the Browns if BR ran the team. He'd trade him and Joe Thomas for an all BSPN over hyped team wrecking our salary cap. LOL

sleeper;1643804 wrote:I was merely staying the the Texans already have a strong D-line.

Commander of Awesome;1643805 wrote:If you could trade an injured old QQing overpaid WR for a stud young team friendly contract DT, you'd do it regardless of dline depth was my point.

Midstate01;1643812 wrote:I doubt this rumor is true. But I do wonder if hoyers attitude is starting to make the browns uneasy. If he loses the job is he even going to help out manzeil at all. Because it doesn't sound like he's mentored him at all so far. Then hoyers comments yesterday came off as super whiny and defensive.

sleeper;1643810 wrote:Yeah so the Patriots should trade Gronkowski and 3 1st rounders for Andrew Luck because he's on a friendly rookie contract and Gronkowski is often injured anyway.

Your logic. Is terrible.

Midstate01;1643812 wrote:I doubt this rumor is true. But I do wonder if hoyers attitude is starting to make the browns uneasy. If he loses the job is he even going to help out manzeil at all. Because it doesn't sound like he's mentored him at all so far. Then hoyers comments yesterday came off as super whiny and defensive.

thavoice;1643811 wrote:Herp Derp reverse jinx!!!!! Derp .

thavoice;1643811 wrote:WTF is up with the NFL not coming out about Gordon?

I am thinking he doesnt get suspended for the season with this delay.

Commander of Awesome;1643819 wrote:Your arguement against my logic is terrible. How does including 3 1st = Phil Taylor? Lol nice fail

sleeper;1643825 wrote:Let me summarize. I would not trade PT for AJ.
The Texans do not need D-line just like the Patriots don't need a QB. Just because PT is a good player, does not mean the Texans want him. Depth is nice, but if you already have depth you are not allocating your roster resources effectively.

Sorry I had to explain this logic like I was talking to a 3-year old.