Central District Coaches Poll #2 - 12/16/09

Home Archive High School Wrestling Central District Coaches Poll #2 - 12/16/09
D

Dad4Sports

Senior Member

1,779 posts
Dec 16, 2009 8:55 AM
From the Dispatch

http://blog.dispatch.com/highschools..._polls_1.shtml

Wrestling: Area coaches polls

Division I
Top teams: 1. Pickerington North, 2. Teays Valley, 3. Hilliard Darby, 4. Marysville, 5. Hilliard Davidson, 6. Olentangy Liberty, 7. Dublin Coffman, 8. Westerville North, 9. Lancaster, 10. Grove City.

Top individuals coming soon

Division II
Top teams: 1. Olentangy, 2. Canal Winchester, 3. London, 4. DeSales, 5. Hilliard Bradley, 6. Licking Valley, 7. Big Walnut, 8. Jonathan Alder, 9. Hartley, 10. Hamilton Township.

Top individuals: 103: 1. Fiorucci (Olentangy), 2. Price (Licking Heights), 3. Jenkins (Canal Winchester). 112: 1. Wilson (DeSales), 2. McHugh (Olentangy), 3. Blacka (Jonathan Alder). 119: 1. Perez (London), 2. White (Big Walnut), 3. Webber (Olentangy). 125: 1. Hutchins (Canal Winchester), 2. Colvin (London), 3. Caserta (Olentangy). 130: 1. Shepard (Highland), 2. Fusco (Hartley), 3. Fosco (Olentangy). 135: 1. Wolfe (Licking Heights), 2. McAndrew (Highland), 3. Yant (Olentangy). 140: 1. Strayer (Lakewood), 2. Napier (Whitehall), 3. Rigney (Jonathan Alder). 145: 1. Rosch (Canal Winchester), 2. Grandominico (Olentangy), 3. Higgins (Hilliard Bradley). 152: 1. Hetterscheidt (Olentangy), 2. Worley (Big Walnut), 3. Silvers (London) and Driscoll (Hilliard Bradley). 160: 1. Zang (Hartley), 2. Clark (Whitehall), 3. Harble (Licking Valley) and Riggs (Hilliard Bradley). 171: 1. Bellamy (Canal Winchester), 2. Palmer (Jonathan Alder), 3. Kirby (Olentangy). 189: 1. Blankenship (Jonathan Alder), 2. Burrell (DeSales), 3. Mitchell (Licking Valley). 215: 1. Brown (Big Walnut), 2. Jackson (Hartley), 3. Stinemetz (Olentangy). 285: 1. Schramm (London), 2. Settles (Hamilton Township), 3. Pressley (Canal Winchester).

Division III

Top teams: 1. West Jefferson, 2. Heath; 3. Northmor; 4. Amanda-Clearcreek; 5. Utica; 6. Cardington; 7. Ready; 8. Pleasant; 9. Newark Catholic; 10. Grandview.

Top individuals: 103: 1. Regoli (Bloom-Carroll), 2. Fields (Pleasant), 3. Yoho (Ready). 112: 1. Carroll (Northmor), 2. Hall (Ready), 3. Hughes (West Jefferson). 119: 1. Heminger (Northmor), 2. Branham (West Jefferson), 3. Ankrom (Bloom-Carroll). 125: 1. Wheeler (Utica), 2. Neer (Northmor), 3. Reichle (West Jefferson). 130: 1. Coulter (Cardington), 2. Corns (Amanda-Clearcreek), 3. Beltz (East Knox). 135: 1. Gualtieri (West Jefferson), 2. Barlow (Heath), 3. Martello (Ready). 140: 1. Blackwell (West Jefferson), 2. Robinson (Heath), 3. George (Cardington). 145: 1. Prather (West Jefferson), 2. Nelson (Newark Catholic), 3. Cummins (Cardington). 152: 1. Falk (Grandview), 2. Robinson (Johnstown), 3. Slade (Pleasant). 160: 1. Cochran (West Jefferson), 2. Wilson (Amanda-Clearcreek), 3. King (Heath). 171: 1. Chenetski (Amanda-Clearcreek), 2. Garber (Newark Catholic), 3. Posey (Utica). 189: 1. Miller (Amanda-Clearcreek), 2. Drumm (Heath), 3. Beatty (Ready). 215: 1. Fabry (West Jefferson), 2. Wright (Northmor), 3. Ackerman (North Union). HVY.: 1. Setser (Northmor), 2. McAfee (Liberty Union), 3. Campbell (Mount Gilead).
Dec 16, 2009 8:55am
L

lowsingle174

Senior Member

575 posts
Dec 16, 2009 11:27 AM
I always love seeing the rankings.
Dec 16, 2009 11:27am
O

oldschoollion123

Member

90 posts
Dec 16, 2009 12:15 PM
Al few of the Westfall kids should be in those rankings and the team should be in the top 10
Dec 16, 2009 12:15pm
Heretic's avatar

Heretic

Son of the Sun

18,820 posts
Dec 16, 2009 12:28 PM
^^
According to the OHSAA school directory I have at my work desk, Westfall is a SE district team and not a Central district one.

Here's a question for those in the know: With Highland and Hartley moving from DIII to DII this year, will that mean there will be fewer teams in the DIII sectional meets? Or have either a couple teams been bumped from II to III or will there just be a couple more teams that really are in another district getting "moved" to the Central (like I recall Coshocton and someone else doing a few years back)?
Dec 16, 2009 12:28pm
K

kennypowers

Senior Member

120 posts
Dec 16, 2009 12:48 PM
Heretic wrote: ^^
According to the OHSAA school directory I have at my work desk, Westfall is a SE district team and not a Central district one.

Here's a question for those in the know: With Highland and Hartley moving from DIII to DII this year, will that mean there will be fewer teams in the DIII sectional meets? Or have either a couple teams been bumped from II to III or will there just be a couple more teams that really are in another district getting "moved" to the Central (like I recall Coshocton and someone else doing a few years back)?
Amanda Clearcreek and Utica both dropped to Div. 3
Dec 16, 2009 12:48pm
D

Dad4Sports

Senior Member

1,779 posts
Dec 16, 2009 1:08 PM
Heretic....

http://www.cdab.org/sports/wr/default.htm

26 teams in D2....32 (combined) in D3

You are correct about Westfall...SE in wrestling

SE, East and Central will combine for the D3 District Tournament at Heath....
Dec 16, 2009 1:08pm
6

6 minutes

Senior Member

190 posts
Dec 16, 2009 1:21 PM
Yoho(Ready) is at 130-135 not 103......maybe 119 in the future but that's as low as he'll get! I also see Rozman(Ready) being in the top 3 at 125 soon
Dec 16, 2009 1:21pm
G

goodsport

Junior Member

13 posts
Dec 16, 2009 1:22 PM
anybody have any thoughts on how D1 125#, 130#, and 135# rankings will go?
Dec 16, 2009 1:22pm
cruiser_96's avatar

cruiser_96

Senior Member

7,536 posts
Dec 16, 2009 1:38 PM
WHen I a) get some emails from coaches or b) get some results... I'll compile them and send them in. This weekend and the holiday tournaments ALWAYS seem to get good exposure for results.

Hang tight.

In the mean time...

125
1. J. McCombs (M) (if here)
2. A. Boehm (WM)
3. A. Taylor (WK)

130
1. S. Clutter (W)
2. T. Luft (TV)
3. N. Sparks (M)

135
1. R. Languis (DS) (if here)
2. D. Latz (SC)
3. B. Howes (PN)

A couple of things need to pan out for these to be legit. The first, and most obvious, is the fact that these wrestlers must decide to make these weights their home. Certifying early (ie before Christmas or for Christmas tournaments) is an option. But that's only if they are allowed to drop that early.

All that to say, this weekend and next week should clear some things up.
Keep me informed if you would please.
Dec 16, 2009 1:38pm
G

goodsport

Junior Member

13 posts
Dec 16, 2009 2:34 PM
cruiser, any thoughts on swavely 119, whitt 125 or 130, kowelski 145 or hughs at 152 at GC?
Dec 16, 2009 2:34pm
Dirtyscramble's avatar

Dirtyscramble

Senior Member

328 posts
Dec 16, 2009 3:35 PM
Im pretty sure Higgins already wrestled 140 at the Medina duels how is he ranked at 145?
Dec 16, 2009 3:35pm
D

Dad4Sports

Senior Member

1,779 posts
Dec 16, 2009 4:27 PM
Cruiser 96

McCombs wrestled at 125 last weekend (a huge 125 by the way:)) so he is already there.

Question about how these rankings are supposed to work....is it based on the lowest weight class these guys have wrestled at so far? Or where they are projected to be for the post-season? Or neither....weight they wrestled last week.....or none of the above??

Obviously, it would be next to impossible to keep track of all the weights each guy has competed in. These rankings will only be as good as the quality/quantity of information that the coaches pass on to the poll representatives.....

Boehm is WM (not WK) sure it was just a typo....
Dec 16, 2009 4:27pm
J

jaba134

Member

37 posts
Dec 16, 2009 6:56 PM
Jenkins for canal..at 103 does not wrestle anymore..and Bellomy has wrestled 152/160 all year.
Dec 16, 2009 6:56pm
M

Mat Shark

Member

56 posts
Dec 16, 2009 6:56 PM
BOGUS

not only ranking kids at weight classes they haven't wrestled at,
not only ranking kids at weight classes they won't be eligible to wrestle at,
but now ranking a kid that has never even wrestled a high school match

B-O-G-U-S
Dec 16, 2009 6:56pm
H

hizzmuther

Senior Member

215 posts
Dec 16, 2009 7:05 PM
ok Mat Shark... we'll be expecting your not so bogus, entirely accurate, rankings each week. Let's see... each week I'm pretty bored and could use some interesting reading by about Monday afternoon... I'll be expecting them then. And let us know where you find the results that you will be using... particularly individual results from duel meet tournaments because I'm still having lots of trouble finding them.
Dec 16, 2009 7:05pm
ontheline's avatar

ontheline

Senior Member

188 posts
Dec 16, 2009 7:06 PM
Mat Shark wrote: BOGUS

not only ranking kids at weight classes they haven't wrestled at,
not only ranking kids at weight classes they won't be eligible to wrestle at,
but now ranking a kid that has never even wrestled a high school match

B-O-G-U-S
Enlighten us, what the sam h3!! are you talking about. I think I can make a correlation to your b-o-g-u-s point #1 but what / who are you referring to for b-o-g-u-s #2 and #3?
Dec 16, 2009 7:06pm
Westie101's avatar

Westie101

Senior Member

847 posts
Dec 16, 2009 7:28 PM
not that i agree with him, but i think hes bogus #2 is refering to yoho, i doubt that kid can cut to 103.
Dec 16, 2009 7:28pm
Fab1b's avatar

Fab1b

The Bald A-Hole!!

12,949 posts
Dec 16, 2009 7:45 PM
Rankings are opinions guys, they will settle it on the mat if they meet. Heck the season just started let kids settle into their weight classes and progress. No one will ever agree with someone's rankings, if you don't like them do your own rankings. Its not that big a deal to get all worked up over, rankings don't put you on the podium at state!
Dec 16, 2009 7:45pm
P

Power half

Senior Member

143 posts
Dec 16, 2009 8:01 PM
My suggestion is, if you don't like them do your own. These people are ranking to help out they are not paid. So if don't like them do your own.
Dec 16, 2009 8:01pm
D

Dad4Sports

Senior Member

1,779 posts
Dec 16, 2009 10:48 PM
I'll 2nd, 3rd and 4th these comments......

Everyone is not expected to agree (wouldn't that be boring). If you don't agree with a team/individual ranking, then respectfully explain why. Back up your point of view with results, head-to-head, etc.

Don't just sit here and bitch.......

And has been already stated, nothing's preventing anyone from coming up with their own rankings. To do it right, you'll need to put in hours upon hours of your time.....go for it!
Dec 16, 2009 10:48pm
T

Thee Dogs

Member

59 posts
Dec 16, 2009 10:49 PM
King is listed as D3 160 lb for Heath but he is at D2 Lakewood.
Dec 16, 2009 10:49pm
cruiser_96's avatar

cruiser_96

Senior Member

7,536 posts
Dec 16, 2009 11:04 PM
Dad4sports... Great job for the Indians the last two nights at the Port!!! Little guys up to high school. ...WHat the Feck!?!?!?!

I don't know why I do what I do with Boehm and Taylor. I've done it twice now.

As for individual rankings...it'll be tough but I think I might have a way to do it. But eventually, it will come down to wrestling and figuring it out on the mat.

I thought at first it would be impossible. But, on second thought, national rankers do it all the time. So why can't I. But then again, they have solid rankings and do the rankings AFTER all the results are in. Still subjective though.

I'm sure when I display mine, I'll do so with at least a paragraph as to how and why I rank as I do. Thanks guys.
Dec 16, 2009 11:04pm
M

monarchpride

Senior Member

189 posts
Dec 17, 2009 10:17 AM
WOW Olentangy has 11 ranked wrestlers out of 14 weight classes
Dec 17, 2009 10:17am
S

sick switch

Junior Member

6 posts
Dec 17, 2009 2:13 PM
shouldnt be too much of a suprise when you move down from D 1 to D2 after you have already been a good program in D1 ...not trying to bag on D2 here just stating the facts
Dec 17, 2009 2:13pm
6

6 minutes

Senior Member

190 posts
Dec 17, 2009 3:26 PM
who does the d2 rankings?
Dec 17, 2009 3:26pm