Browns Fans: Should the team consider signing Mike Vick this offseason?

Home Archive Pro Sports Browns Fans: Should the team consider signing Mike Vick this offseason?
Art Modell's avatar

Art Modell

Senior Member

2,338 posts
Sep 21, 2010 10:56 PM
ZombieKiller;492825 wrote:why would Vick want to ruin his career by going to the Browns? He is better off going back to jail.

LMFAO. Cant stop laughing reading this thread.
Sep 21, 2010 10:56pm
like_that's avatar

like_that

1st Team All-PWN

26,625 posts
Sep 21, 2010 10:57 PM
justincredible;492847 wrote:Browns wouldn't have to give up a 1st round pick to get Vick if Philly was going to trade him, anyway.

Yeah, because he isnt at a first round value.
Sep 21, 2010 10:57pm
Commander of Awesome's avatar

Commander of Awesome

Senior Pwner

23,151 posts
Sep 21, 2010 11:00 PM
This is the DUMBEST fucking thing I have ever seen posted on OC. And based on the talent that posts here thats a big statement. Trading a top 5 pick for an aging QB with mediocre speed because he played a decent game with top talent in the NFL around him against the god damn lions. LMAO. WOW HB/rydawg5 you may have just passed Gibby/TyWebb/AlCapone/ArtModell/Dynasty as the biggest idiots to post on OC. Congrats. Nice FAIL morons.

Edit to add Jordo/S&L (Nice OU fail)/deydurkie to the list.
Sep 21, 2010 11:00pm
Art Modell's avatar

Art Modell

Senior Member

2,338 posts
Sep 21, 2010 11:03 PM
LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL
Sep 21, 2010 11:03pm
Commander of Awesome's avatar

Commander of Awesome

Senior Pwner

23,151 posts
Sep 21, 2010 11:10 PM
Hb31187;492795 wrote:Vick would help the browns more than any player they could draft with that #1 pick. He still has his explosiveness so if the browns line keeps allowing the QB to be pressured he has the ability to escape. He would force teams to basically put a spy on him which is 1 less defender geared towards stopping the run or dropping back in coverage. He has 5 or 6 good years left in him, and you KNOW what you're going to get with him, if you draft a player, you have no idea how he will pan out (and in the browns case usually doesnt end up well). And hed put butts in seats and sell tickets. Its a win win win

Maybe we should trade first round picks for Farve and Portis/Larry Johnson/TO/Tomilson/Jason Taylor and the sign Jerry Rice to a $50 mil deal to "put butts in the seats"; even though Cleveland sells out every game anyways. I realize youre a fan of a fair weather team, but Cleveland doesnt need "one player" to sell out, LOLFAIL.
Sep 21, 2010 11:10pm
like_that's avatar

like_that

1st Team All-PWN

26,625 posts
Sep 21, 2010 11:18 PM
Hb31187;492795 wrote:Vick would help the browns more than any player they could draft with that #1 pick. He still has his explosiveness so if the browns line keeps allowing the QB to be pressured he has the ability to escape. He would force teams to basically put a spy on him which is 1 less defender geared towards stopping the run or dropping back in coverage. He has 5 or 6 good years left in him, and you KNOW what you're going to get with him, if you draft a player, you have no idea how he will pan out (and in the browns case usually doesnt end up well). And hed put butts in seats and sell tickets. Its a win win win

You are out of your mind thinking he has 5-6 good years left in him. First thing to go when you are older is your athletic ability, aka Vick's speed. That's pretty much Vick's game as he only relies on his speed. He isn't even going to be close to having the same speed 5-6 years from now.
Sep 21, 2010 11:18pm
sleeper's avatar

sleeper

Legend

27,879 posts
Sep 21, 2010 11:27 PM
I'd take Vick as we've seen Delhomme and Wallace are not the answer. The season is young, its too early to tell how the rest of the season will play out, but did anyone expect the Browns to be that great this year?

The answer is no.
Sep 21, 2010 11:27pm
I

I Wear Pants

Senior Member

16,223 posts
Sep 21, 2010 11:42 PM
Mike Vick killed Commander of Awesome's dog. Obviously.
Sep 21, 2010 11:42pm
Hb31187's avatar

Hb31187

Senior Member

8,534 posts
Sep 22, 2010 2:35 AM
like_that;492945 wrote:You are out of your mind thinking he has 5-6 good years left in him. First thing to go when you are older is your athletic ability, aka Vick's speed. That's pretty much Vick's game as he only relies on his speed. He isn't even going to be close to having the same speed 5-6 years from now.

I really do not think he slows down THAT much in the next 5 years. He'll slow down sure, but he'll still be at about a 4.5 IMO. And im nto saying you have to sign him long term, but if you get a few good years out of him its better than rolling the dice on drafting a player bc the browns havent had much if any luck at drafting aside from Joe Thomas
Sep 22, 2010 2:35am
Hb31187's avatar

Hb31187

Senior Member

8,534 posts
Sep 22, 2010 2:36 AM
Commander of Awesome;492936 wrote:Maybe we should trade first round picks for Farve and Portis/Larry Johnson/TO/Tomilson/Jason Taylor and the sign Jerry Rice to a $50 mil deal to "put butts in the seats"; even though Cleveland sells out every game anyways. I realize youre a fan of a fair weather team, but Cleveland doesnt need "one player" to sell out, LOLFAIL.

Did i say you had to pay him outrageous? No, but I guarantee he would help you out more than any first round pick you could make next year. Fan of a fair weather team? How the hell are the falcons fair weather?
Sep 22, 2010 2:36am
Hb31187's avatar

Hb31187

Senior Member

8,534 posts
Sep 22, 2010 2:37 AM
Commander of Awesome;492924 wrote:This is the DUMBEST fucking thing I have ever seen posted on OC. And based on the talent that posts here thats a big statement. Trading a top 5 pick for an aging QB with mediocre speed because he played a decent game with top talent in the NFL around him against the god damn lions. LMAO. WOW HB/rydawg5 you may have just passed Gibby/TyWebb/AlCapone/ArtModell/Dynasty as the biggest idiots to post on OC. Congrats. Nice FAIL morons.

Edit to add Jordo/S&L (Nice OU fail)/deydurkie to the list.
LOL @ this guy. Are you the late 2010 version of SQ?
Sep 22, 2010 2:37am
R

rydawg5

Senior Member

2,639 posts
Sep 22, 2010 7:37 AM
what is dumb to me is passing up on someone established like Vick to draft another top 10 pick who will be in Cleveland for 3 years before we trade him away for a 4th round pick or cut him.

You tell me how our #1 picks for the last 11 years has built our team? where is our franchise qb?

You are exaggerating to the point where you can't even be taken seriously about Vicks degrading abilities.

Since 1999 tell me 1 Browns QB who was as good as Vick? We have had plenty of first round picks to resolve this issue.. They failed.

Also (build our team through draft).. how many of our 1st round picks since 1999 did we get that have been here 4 plus years as a starter?

The Browns have and continue to fail at drafting. Why not get a guy for 4-5 years who can make real plays and win games?
Sep 22, 2010 7:37am
B

BR1986FB

Senior Member

24,104 posts
Sep 22, 2010 8:00 AM
Might want to change "Michael Vick" to "Kevin Kolb" in the title. Now that the Iggles are going with Vick, Sal Paolantonio (sp?) from ESPN reported that it is Kolb that is now on the trading block. BTW...I don't want Kolb.
Sep 22, 2010 8:00am
R

rydawg5

Senior Member

2,639 posts
Sep 22, 2010 8:15 AM
Im not crazy about Kolb
Sep 22, 2010 8:15am
Rotinaj's avatar

Rotinaj

Senior Member

7,699 posts
Sep 22, 2010 8:27 AM
How could Kolb go from being named the starter on sunday to being on the trading block that fast???
Sep 22, 2010 8:27am
Commander of Awesome's avatar

Commander of Awesome

Senior Pwner

23,151 posts
Sep 22, 2010 8:31 AM
Hb31187;493042 wrote:I really do not think he slows down THAT much in the next 5 years. He'll slow down sure, but he'll still be at about a 4.5 IMO. And im nto saying you have to sign him long term, but if you get a few good years out of him its better than rolling the dice on drafting a player bc the browns havent had much if any luck at drafting aside from Joe Thomas

Trading a 1st round pick for an aging mediocre QB/good athlete, LMAO. Also he's in the last year of his deal, thus have to give him a fat new contract, nice FAIL. Oh wait, you don't think it would cost that much to sign him huh? Oh nice assumption, dont bother posting, I already know your failsponse.

New sheirff in town with a proven GM (Heckert, proven draft record -see Eagles), and a team president with a proven Offensive mind. I would like to see what they can come up with in the draft. So far with Haden and TJ Ward, they're looking good.
Sep 22, 2010 8:31am
Hb31187's avatar

Hb31187

Senior Member

8,534 posts
Sep 22, 2010 8:39 AM
Commander of Awesome;493109 wrote:Trading a 1st round pick for an aging mediocre QB/good athlete, LMAO. Also he's in the last year of his deal, thus have to give him a fat new contract, nice FAIL. Oh wait, you don't think it would cost that much to sign him huh? Oh nice assumption, dont bother posting, I already know your failsponse.

New sheirff in town with a proven GM (Heckert, proven draft record -see Eagles), and a team president with a proven Offensive mind. I would like to see what they can come up with in the draft. So far with Haden and TJ Ward, they're looking good.
lmao you're one arrogant fuck. Hes a guy who barely got back into the league and is an older qb who relied on athleticism why would he think hes gettin a fat contract? Okay we'll see how you do with your new GM (your picks this year are workign out wonderfully this year btw)
Sep 22, 2010 8:39am
B

BR1986FB

Senior Member

24,104 posts
Sep 22, 2010 8:48 AM
Hb31187;493112 wrote: Okay we'll see how you do with your new GM (your picks this year are workign out wonderfully this year btw)

What the fuck is THAT supposed to mean? Haden & Ward have been solid and Luavao will eventually be the starter at RG and I still think Hardesty has a future as a feature back. Did Heckert have TWENTY 1ST round draft picks to turn this putrid franchise around THIS year and nobody told me about it?
Sep 22, 2010 8:48am
Hb31187's avatar

Hb31187

Senior Member

8,534 posts
Sep 22, 2010 8:52 AM
Didnt say first round picks did i?
Sep 22, 2010 8:52am
B

BR1986FB

Senior Member

24,104 posts
Sep 22, 2010 8:57 AM
Commander of Awesome;493109 wrote:
New sheirff in town with a proven GM (Heckert, proven draft record -see Eagles), and a team president with a proven Offensive mind. I would like to see what they can come up with in the draft. So far with Haden and TJ Ward, they're looking good.

Which is why I don't think Vick will be on their radar. A #1 WR is the MOST glaring need on this offense and if they won't take a shot at Vincent Jackson, with his past troubles, I doubt they take a flier on Vick.

Heckert has already said how much they value draft picks and how they will build through the draft. Browns fans aren't going to want to hear this because we've suffered enough but fans are going to have to be patient until they've had a chance to do a few drafts. My biggest fear is that if they DO fire Mangini and bring in a 4-3 coach like Gruden (who I'm not sold on), they will have to overhaul the defense AGAIN to find players that fit the scheme.

If they completely tank this year I will say that Holmgren is partially to blame. Not because he got Delhomme & Wallace but because he stuck with Mangini and allowed him to keep that shitbag Daboll. Most new regimes blow it up and start with their own guys but Holmgren didn't think it was "fair" to fire Mangini after one season.

Does this mean I've lost faith in Holmgren? Not at all but he will have to shoulder some blame for keeping Mangini and setting the franchise back an extra year if this team ends up with a miserable record this year.
Sep 22, 2010 8:57am
B

BR1986FB

Senior Member

24,104 posts
Sep 22, 2010 9:04 AM
Hb31187;493121 wrote:Didnt say first round picks did i?

No, you didn't but that's essentially what they would have needed to turn things around in ONE year. Anything after the 3rd round is a crapshoot so unless they had at least 7-10 more draft picks in the first 3 rounds, this years draft wasn't going to have the impact you're implying.
Sep 22, 2010 9:04am
B

BR1986FB

Senior Member

24,104 posts
Sep 22, 2010 10:13 AM
Rotinaj;493107 wrote:How could Kolb go from being named the starter on sunday to being on the trading block that fast???

Good question but Vick should have been their starter from Day 1 anyhow. Philly is built to win NOW and their players & fans don't have the patience to go through the growing pains of, essentially, a rookie QB.

Kolb would be better suited to take his lumps on a losing team like Cleveland, Tampa, St Louis (as an example, they already have their QB) where the team has time to groom him. Philly still has a window, with their talent, to be a playoff team.
Sep 22, 2010 10:13am
Commander of Awesome's avatar

Commander of Awesome

Senior Pwner

23,151 posts
Sep 22, 2010 10:36 AM
BR1986FB;493129 wrote:Which is why I don't think Vick will be on their radar. A #1 WR is the MOST glaring need on this offense and if they won't take a shot at Vincent Jackson, with his past troubles, I doubt they take a flier on Vick.

Heckert has already said how much they value draft picks and how they will build through the draft. Browns fans aren't going to want to hear this because we've suffered enough but fans are going to have to be patient until they've had a chance to do a few drafts. My biggest fear is that if they DO fire Mangini and bring in a 4-3 coach like Gruden (who I'm not sold on), they will have to overhaul the defense AGAIN to find players that fit the scheme.

If they completely tank this year I will say that Holmgren is partially to blame. Not because he got Delhomme & Wallace but because he stuck with Mangini and allowed him to keep that shitbag Daboll. Most new regimes blow it up and start with their own guys but Holmgren didn't think it was "fair" to fire Mangini after one season.

Does this mean I've lost faith in Holmgren? Not at all but he will have to shoulder some blame for keeping Mangini and setting the franchise back an extra year if this team ends up with a miserable record this year.

I dont blame them for not going after Jackson. He wants a new fat deal, with the uncertainty of the collective bargaining agreement, and he is one slip up from being suspended for an entire season. Also reports are coming out now that Phillip Rivers had to bail the idiot out of jail the morning of their playoff loss. You dont give up what little assests this team has to aquire a shit storm like Vincent Jackson.

Gruden was an OC so maybe he doesnt mess with the Defense. When we fire Womangini I hope we retain Ryan as the DC. He has what it takes IMO.

Holmgren not stepping in and putting his stamp on the team ala going to a Offensive scheme that works is a fail on his part. He should have had the stones to tell Erica Womangini the score and if you want to work in the NFL this is how its going to be. Lets hope dumbass daboll is gone by the bye week with Gil Haskell being made our OC.

On Hardesty, he is Lee Suggs. All the talent, none of the durability. In 4 yrs at Tenn he only managed to play one year, major red flag. I dont think we can count on him for anything going on.
Sep 22, 2010 10:36am
J

jmog

Senior Member

6,567 posts
Sep 22, 2010 11:11 AM
I'm sorry, but the funniest thing posted on this thread was Modell saying that Big Ben is a top 4 QB right now and a sure fire 1st ballot HoFer...that was comical.
Sep 22, 2010 11:11am
like_that's avatar

like_that

1st Team All-PWN

26,625 posts
Sep 22, 2010 11:27 AM
rydawg5;493072 wrote:what is dumb to me is passing up on someone established like Vick to draft another top 10 pick who will be in Cleveland for 3 years before we trade him away for a 4th round pick or cut him.

You tell me how our #1 picks for the last 11 years has built our team? where is our franchise qb?

You are exaggerating to the point where you can't even be taken seriously about Vicks degrading abilities.

Since 1999 tell me 1 Browns QB who was as good as Vick? We have had plenty of first round picks to resolve this issue.. They failed.

Also (build our team through draft).. how many of our 1st round picks since 1999 did we get that have been here 4 plus years as a starter?

The Browns have and continue to fail at drafting. Why not get a guy for 4-5 years who can make real plays and win games?

Oh, so the Browns should just give up on the draft and trade all their picks away for players? GTFO. NO bottom feeder team would EVER trade it's number 1 pick, unless it is to move down the draft and gain other picks. Like I said, when your team has NO talent, you don't trade away picks.
Sep 22, 2010 11:27am