USC got in because they "won" the PAC 12. 

And also, I would give the bid from the ACC to Miami over Clemson. Miami's loss to Pitt is bad, but Syracuse didn't win a single game after beating Clemson. That is a much worse loss than Pitt. 

They need to make it a requirement that a team must make it to the conference title to be eligible. Total bs that Auburn misses because they had to play an extra game that Alabama did not

posted by Classyposter58

They need to make it a requirement that a team must make it to the conference title to be eligible. Total bs that Auburn misses because they had to play an extra game that Alabama did not

I agree. How is the conference runner up not as worthy as someone who didn't play for the conference title?

I have no issue with OSU being left out really. 2 losses (especially the Iowa loss) basically knocks you out i think. I just don't think 2 sec teams deserve to be in, especially when they said they were going to give credit for playing a tougher schedule and Alabama didn't. Why not USC? I think even Wisconsin has a better resume.