Shut down the investigation without identifying a suspect.  Hilarious, on one hand, as we knew they would never tell the truth; rather scary on the other hand, that they continue to hoodwink so many people.  No shame with these mofo's.

posted by QuakerOats

Shut down the investigation without identifying a suspect.  Hilarious, on one hand, as we knew they would never tell the truth; rather scary on the other hand, that they continue to hoodwink so many people.  No shame with these mofo's.

As everyone expected.

"Your premise on its face is utterly stupid and incorrect."

No, that would be you.

"You are stating that the laws around drug use are far worse to the family structure and drug user then the drug."

Gee, daddy is addicted to coke, is it better for the family to get him some help or just throw him in prison?

 "So with your logic, someone that is killed by a drunk driver or under the influence of drugs does so because we haev laws that say you cant do that."

It's "have" and "can't". More important is your inability to distinguish someone doing a drug which physically harms no one but himself versus attempting to operate a multi-thousand pound piece of machinery under the influence of said drug which should of course be illegal.

posted by iclfan2

As everyone expected.

It's hard to believe they don't know.  But I'm not sure they can keep that info from a House committee.

If it's anyone but about 20 people, this is probably the correct course of action.  But pretending like they don't know is bound to prompt inquiries concerned with a cover-up.

And on a related note, it's interesting because if it was Hunter's that would supposedly void his plea deal.

If they cannot tell us what happened in the most secure building in the world, they should all be fired.

If they won't tell us what happened; they should all be fired and charged for a cover up.

As for it being Hunter, which would void his plea deal; hadn't heard that.  If true, then it all makes perfect sense. 

They make Nixon look like a two-bit amateur. 

posted by QuakerOats

If they cannot tell us what happened in the most secure building in the world, they should all be fired.

If they won't tell us what happened; they should all be fired and charged for a cover up.

As for it being Hunter, which would void his plea deal; hadn't heard that.  If true, then it all makes perfect sense. 

They make Nixon look like a two-bit amateur. 

Lol, it's coke, dude; not something that actually matters. Ever think more people would at least pretend to take you seriously if you weren't always acting like the art of being hilariously over the top with every claim was an Olympic sport and you're determined to win gold again?

posted by QuakerOats

If they cannot tell us what happened in the most secure building in the world, they should all be fired.

Are all 1800 employees and who knows how many visitors under constant surveillance every second they're in the building? If so, sounds like a incredible waste of money to me.