Well, I found a reaction vid that showed the complete interview. So here's my thoughts.
1.) First and foremost, since this was a pre-recorded interview from a friend, they had the time for do overs. But they didn't take advantage of that time and it shows.
2.) I'm amazed. And a little bit in disbelief.
3.) I'm trying to understand how you can create air biscuit answers when your friend is giving you multiple choice answers baked into the question. All you have to do is pick the one that sounds better.
4.) Kamala never changed her mind or changed her positions because her values never changed. Okay...
5.) I'm not sure if her fracking answer will help her win Pennsylvania, which is 19 votes in the EC. She should rely heavily on Philadelphia only. Maybe Pittsburgh, too. But im not sure she can win Pitt over now, or enough of that county's population. Definitely solidify Philadelphia.
6.) Dana Bash, to her credit, got really close to getting some solid answers. Where she messed up is, I think, not forcing follow up questions to get a solid and direct answer. But her bosses probably told her not to zero in too much because CNN doesn't want to lose access now that they had their foot in the door.
7.) Walz is just going to blame all of his discrepancies in grammatical errors.
That's all I got. Anybody have differing views or am I forgetting something important?
