SQ_Crazies
Posts: 7,977
Mar 28, 2010 5:10pm
LeBron's got 31 on 12-18. LOL @ people who thought that when he said he could win the scoring title he meant he'd have to jack up 40 shots a game. He could win it and still win games--which is what he's done before and is doing now, he just doesn't care if he does it or not. He scores what he needs to for his team to win the game, not concerned with how many points he scores a night--that's what he really said.
I love it when people completely overreact to comments that athletes make.
I love it when people completely overreact to comments that athletes make.
D
devil1197
Posts: 6,220
Mar 28, 2010 5:22pm
Jamison had a decent game.
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
Mar 28, 2010 5:24pm
Jamison sucks! That is all....devil1197 wrote: Jamison had a decent game.
SQ_Crazies
Posts: 7,977
Mar 28, 2010 5:24pm
Haha, decent. Alright Footwedge.devil1197 wrote: Jamison had a decent game.
Thank God he had a great game because Mo had 6, we didn't get shit from our bench--and for whatever reason we only brought 3 guys off the bench all game.
SQ_Crazies
Posts: 7,977
Mar 28, 2010 5:27pm
What were the per minute numbers for Jamison and Powe today? With Andy out Powe finally got those minutes FW wanted.
D
devil1197
Posts: 6,220
Mar 28, 2010 5:34pm
Hmmm, Jamison played 41 minutes today which was the most on the team.
He has the ability to play the 3 and 4 like he did today.
He has the ability to play the 3 and 4 like he did today.
Lovejoy1984
Posts: 5,277
Mar 28, 2010 5:51pm
But he only scored 26 points.devil1197 wrote: Hmmm, Jamison played 41 minutes today which was the most on the team.
He has the ability to play the 3 and 4 like he did today.
So he averaged .63 points PM.
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
Mar 28, 2010 6:00pm
slackerHighRoller74 wrote:But he only scored 26 points.devil1197 wrote: Hmmm, Jamison played 41 minutes today which was the most on the team.
He has the ability to play the 3 and 4 like he did today.
So he averaged .63 points PM.
F
Footwedge
Posts: 9,265
Mar 28, 2010 7:56pm
Very similar to Monta's numbers.HighRoller74 wrote:
But he only scored 26 points.
So he averaged .63 points PM.
Today's game illustrated that the Cavs cannot afford to lose Verajea during the playoffs.
hoops23
Posts: 15,696
Mar 28, 2010 7:58pm
Not exactly, because Antawn shot over 50%. He was very efficient. If you're always so quick to come after him when he messes up, you should be as quick to give him props.Footwedge wrote:Very similar to Monta's numbers.HighRoller74 wrote:
But he only scored 26 points.
So he averaged .63 points PM.
Today's game illustrated that the Cavs cannot afford to lose Verajea during the playoffs.
We DON'T beat the Kings w/o Jamison today.
SQ_Crazies
Posts: 7,977
Mar 28, 2010 7:59pm
Add this to the list of reasons that you post for nothing more than shock value and a response these days, you're obviously doing this on purpose.Footwedge wrote: Verajea
SQ_Crazies
Posts: 7,977
Mar 28, 2010 8:00pm
Powe scored 4 in 21 minutes. What's the per minute comparison FW?
D
devil1197
Posts: 6,220
Mar 28, 2010 8:02pm
11/21 for 52% FG
2/4 for 50% 3P
2/2 for 100% FT
26 points, 9 boards, and 2 assits.
GOAT like
2/4 for 50% 3P
2/2 for 100% FT
26 points, 9 boards, and 2 assits.
GOAT like
SQ_Crazies
Posts: 7,977
Mar 28, 2010 8:08pm
Good thing too because FW's boy Powe didn't bring us much off the bench today. Especially in terms of per minute numbers.
F
Footwedge
Posts: 9,265
Mar 28, 2010 8:38pm
Because i misspell a player's name? I do it for shock value?SQ_Crazies wrote:Add this to the list of reasons that you post for nothing more than shock value and a response these days, you're obviously doing this on purpose.Footwedge wrote: Verajea
A really long reach....
SQ_Crazies
Posts: 7,977
Mar 28, 2010 8:40pm
Because you talk about him so much, because you're all about validity and credibility, because you refer me to stat pages and tell me to learn something, because you've been corrected on this at least 5 times in the last month. Not much of a reach. You continue to spell it wrong because you think it gets everyone going--really it just makes us all laugh at you.
hoops23
Posts: 15,696
Mar 28, 2010 8:41pm
lol @ Varajea
Saying it out loud is kind of funny.
Saying it out loud is kind of funny.
SQ_Crazies
Posts: 7,977
Mar 28, 2010 8:42pm
LOL, yeah it is.LTrain23 wrote: Saying it out loud is kind of funny.
F
Footwedge
Posts: 9,265
Mar 28, 2010 8:44pm
Actually, I've given him props before. Just not very often.Not exactly, because Antawn shot over 50%. He was very efficient. If you're always so quick to come after him when he messes up, you should be as quick to give him props.
In all fairness, you might be right on this one. Jamison had his best game today.We DON'T beat the Kings w/o Jamison today.
Blind squirrel.......acorn...... phenomenom.
F
Footwedge
Posts: 9,265
Mar 28, 2010 8:46pm
Sorry chief...I'm bad at spelling AV's name. For now on, I'll just put Andy or AV.SQ_Crazies wrote: Because you talk about him so much, because you're all about validity and credibility, because you refer me to stat pages and tell me to learn something, because you've been corrected on this at least 5 times in the last month. Not much of a reach. You continue to spell it wrong because you think it gets everyone going--really it just makes us all laugh at you.
I suck at spelling Brazilian names, and you and LTrain suck at math. It all evens ot in the end. LOL.
SQ_Crazies
Posts: 7,977
Mar 28, 2010 8:50pm
No he didn't. Go to NBA.com and check the stats, his best game as a Cavalier came in the loss to the Bucks.Footwedge wrote: In all fairness, you might be right on this one. Jamison had his best game today.
Blind squirrel.......acorn...... phenomenom.
And in the game after that he scored 17 in 21 minutes on 6 of 12 from the floor. What's the per minute on that?
SQ_Crazies
Posts: 7,977
Mar 28, 2010 8:54pm
You're bad at doing things on purpose that you want to appear as an accident. That's what you're really bad at, like I said, you've already been corrected on this at least 5 times in the last month. I feel like someone tells you on every thread--LTrain has told you on multiple occasions.
F
Footwedge
Posts: 9,265
Mar 28, 2010 8:55pm
Nice to see that you have memorized Jamison's games to date. The one that sticks out with me....his first game. You know...his O'fer game.SQ_Crazies wrote:No he didn't. Go to NBA.com and check the stats, his best game as a Cavalier came in the loss to the Bucks.Footwedge wrote: In all fairness, you might be right on this one. Jamison had his best game today.
Blind squirrel.......acorn...... phenomenom.
And in the game after that he scored 17 in 21 minutes on 6 of 12 from the floor. What's the per minute on that?
His PPM weren'y very good that day. Do you remember that game, SQ?
F
Footwedge
Posts: 9,265
Mar 28, 2010 8:59pm
Really SQ...I don't misspell his name on purpose...it just comes out that way.SQ_Crazies wrote: You're bad at doing things on purpose that you want to appear as an accident. That's what you're really bad at, like I said, you've already been corrected on this at least 5 times in the last month. I feel like someone tells you on every thread--LTrain has told you on multiple occasions.
Sorry you think I do it for "shock value".
Sorry that it irritates you so. From now on...it's AV or Andy or Anderson.
SQ_Crazies
Posts: 7,977
Mar 28, 2010 9:07pm
Yep, I sure do. A statistical oddity. I remember when LeBron went 3 for 20 in a game once too. I think there was another one where he was 4-20 or 4-21. Statistical oddities. Shit happens. The Lakers were down by almost 40 to the Thunder the other night, statistical oddity. Need more examples? He's done a damn good job in the other 20 some games he's played with the Cavs.