data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/423e5/423e586f161548da33227d282d03be8f5986371a" alt="stroups's avatar"
stroups
Posts: 3,223
Mar 19, 2010 5:04pm
come on buzzcuts
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/781ec/781ec2a82a911f4fb64f4bedfcb50949ee9fcfc5" alt="Non's avatar"
Non
Posts: 9,517
Mar 19, 2010 5:05pm
let em drive in and have the pressure of a floater or mid-range with the defense blocking
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d4965/d496561939947ab122ea259742a5721fb1eb1086" alt="Fab1b's avatar"
Fab1b
Posts: 12,949
Mar 19, 2010 5:06pm
That's huge if its a turnover!!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/781ec/781ec2a82a911f4fb64f4bedfcb50949ee9fcfc5" alt="Non's avatar"
Non
Posts: 9,517
Mar 19, 2010 5:06pm
off who?
hard to tell
hard to tell
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d4965/d496561939947ab122ea259742a5721fb1eb1086" alt="Fab1b's avatar"
Fab1b
Posts: 12,949
Mar 19, 2010 5:06pm
Well that might do it!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/781ec/781ec2a82a911f4fb64f4bedfcb50949ee9fcfc5" alt="Non's avatar"
Non
Posts: 9,517
Mar 19, 2010 5:06pm
another big turnover by Wofford
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/781ec/781ec2a82a911f4fb64f4bedfcb50949ee9fcfc5" alt="Non's avatar"
Non
Posts: 9,517
Mar 19, 2010 5:07pm
looks like Missouri will win
84-78 with 29 seconds
Mike Anderson's crew able to force turnovers and their style
84-78 with 29 seconds
Mike Anderson's crew able to force turnovers and their style
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/781ec/781ec2a82a911f4fb64f4bedfcb50949ee9fcfc5" alt="Non's avatar"
Non
Posts: 9,517
Mar 19, 2010 5:08pm
big Jon Leuer ain't missing
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/08b9f/08b9f804057c2d4fbe2f97ccc7965f1c2598ffa4" alt="osu45804's avatar"
osu45804
Posts: 6,188
Mar 19, 2010 5:09pm
Wisconsin is gonna squeak out a win
M
mallymal614
Posts: 3,746
Mar 19, 2010 5:10pm
Anyone notice that ever since Turner made his game winning shot against Michigan, just about every team guards the inbound pass when up late lol.
D
dat dude
Posts: 1,564
Mar 19, 2010 5:10pm
Why even put a hand up there if you are Wisconsin? I've never understood that. Take no chances, just let them shoot uncontested.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/781ec/781ec2a82a911f4fb64f4bedfcb50949ee9fcfc5" alt="Non's avatar"
Non
Posts: 9,517
Mar 19, 2010 5:11pm
I'll be 7-0 today if Pitt hangs on
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eaea8/eaea801aee701e7434b6c3a32e51ba19016a9d50" alt="THE4RINGZ's avatar"
THE4RINGZ
Posts: 16,816
Mar 19, 2010 5:11pm
Alright so I got the Mizzou win and the Wisc win, so presuming Pitt wins I hit 6-1 in the first set of games today. Let's go Utah State.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fe6b/4fe6b4547c8454a59e70b8cece0bddf568256a67" alt="Laley23's avatar"
Laley23
Posts: 29,506
Mar 19, 2010 5:15pm
So far my 4 HOT teams which I went against all of them because I sweat they always lose were ND, Minny, Houston, and Ohio. Ohio bucked my trend, but ND and Minny both went down with Houston still to come.Non wrote: I have to say laley's opposite theory has held true a few times
Tennessee and Purdue both stuck it to the trendies
The teams that struggled down the stretch were Nova, Wake, and Florida. Of them, only Florida lost. I think Im sticking to my theory for another year
BTW, anyone know where I can get stream of the Utah St -- Texas AM game?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/781ec/781ec2a82a911f4fb64f4bedfcb50949ee9fcfc5" alt="Non's avatar"
Non
Posts: 9,517
Mar 19, 2010 5:15pm
Pitt has five in double figures
W
wghfan
Posts: 744
Mar 19, 2010 5:15pm
Wisconsin is overated. Cornell is going to roll them.
W
wghfan
Posts: 744
Mar 19, 2010 5:17pm
It is on the cbs sports station if you get it.Laley23 wrote:So far my 4 HOT teams which I went against all of them because I sweat they always lose were ND, Minny, Houston, and Ohio. Ohio bucked my trend, but ND and Minny both went down with Houston still to come.Non wrote: I have to say laley's opposite theory has held true a few times
Tennessee and Purdue both stuck it to the trendies
The teams that struggled down the stretch were Nova, Wake, and Florida. Of them, only Florida lost. I think Im sticking to my theory for another year
BTW, anyone know where I can get stream of the Utah St -- Texas AM game?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eaea8/eaea801aee701e7434b6c3a32e51ba19016a9d50" alt="THE4RINGZ's avatar"
THE4RINGZ
Posts: 16,816
Mar 19, 2010 5:17pm
NCAA.com claims to be streaming all games for free
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/781ec/781ec2a82a911f4fb64f4bedfcb50949ee9fcfc5" alt="Non's avatar"
Non
Posts: 9,517
Mar 19, 2010 5:18pm
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fe6b/4fe6b4547c8454a59e70b8cece0bddf568256a67" alt="Laley23's avatar"
Laley23
Posts: 29,506
Mar 19, 2010 5:19pm
I dont get that stupid station. Sometimes I hate BuckeyeCable.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/781ec/781ec2a82a911f4fb64f4bedfcb50949ee9fcfc5" alt="Non's avatar"
Non
Posts: 9,517
Mar 19, 2010 5:19pm
just launch it and you can pick which game
what's good is last year this online feed was like 25 seconds slow so when you watched on TV you saw the score on TV which was further along than online
but this year it's almost dead on
what's good is last year this online feed was like 25 seconds slow so when you watched on TV you saw the score on TV which was further along than online
but this year it's almost dead on
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fe6b/4fe6b4547c8454a59e70b8cece0bddf568256a67" alt="Laley23's avatar"
Laley23
Posts: 29,506
Mar 19, 2010 5:20pm
Thanks nonNon wrote: http://mmod.ncaa.com/
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a0cff/a0cfffde9372a2f285d0cb1a21d01d340e9d41dd" alt="ts1227's avatar"
ts1227
Posts: 12,319
Mar 19, 2010 5:20pm
FWIW, the feed is fucked for that game anyway. Pixellated to the point it's unwatchable.
Seems to be from the source as its happening both to me with Time Warner on SD, and back home with Dish Network on HD.
Seems to be from the source as its happening both to me with Time Warner on SD, and back home with Dish Network on HD.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/781ec/781ec2a82a911f4fb64f4bedfcb50949ee9fcfc5" alt="Non's avatar"
Non
Posts: 9,517
Mar 19, 2010 5:21pm
Pitt with an impressive performance
Should be a battle with Xavier
Should be a battle with Xavier
M
mallymal614
Posts: 3,746
Mar 19, 2010 5:21pm
For me, online is actually like 20 seconds faster than the TV.Non wrote: just launch it and you can pick which game
what's good is last year this online feed was like 25 seconds slow so when you watched on TV you saw the score on TV which was further along than online
but this year it's almost dead on