E
El Jefe Grande
Posts: 425
Mar 9, 2010 1:20pm
Who is Lindsay Lohan?
.jpg)
september63
Posts: 5,789
Mar 9, 2010 1:22pm
She seems to be one of those celebs (quasi) that when their name begins falling from the tabloid pages, they either have a complete meltdown, or just do something stupid to keep their names on the pages of National Enquirer. Is her attorney the same one that sent you that letter Justin?
zambrown
Posts: 1,093
Mar 9, 2010 1:34pm
Little Danny wrote: When I think of Lohan the phrase AL- coholic comes to mind, not mik-coholic.
Exactly. What an idiot.
majorspark
Posts: 5,122
Mar 9, 2010 1:34pm
I am sure she has quite a bit of experience with herself.derek bomar wrote: go fuck yourself
M
Manhattan Buckeye
Posts: 7,566
Mar 9, 2010 1:39pm
To me it is worse than simply comparing, it is likely in a publicly filed document claiming malfeasance and damages (to the tune of $100M!). I haven't seen the filing so I don't know if Madonna or Oprah are mentioned specifically, but it would seem to me she would have had to make a claim like that considering how popular a name that Lindsey/Lindsay is today, certainly more popular than Susan - I don't know anyone under 35 years old named Susan.Con_Alma wrote: She didn't compare herself to anyone. I didn't see her quoted anywhere in the article. Did I miss something?
september63
Posts: 5,789
Mar 9, 2010 1:40pm
Yes, you missed something. Her attorney said they cannot use the name Lindsay. Because Lindsay is a celebrity much like Oprah or Madonna. One name is all you need to know exactly who they are referring to.Con_Alma wrote: She didn't compare herself to anyone. I didn't see her quoted anywhere in the article. Did I miss something?
C
Con_Alma
Posts: 12,198
Mar 9, 2010 2:13pm
I don't think I did. Those were the words of her attorney to the press. I haven't found Ms. Lohan comparing herself to Oprah or Madonna.
I don't doubt for a minte that the attorney jumped on this opportunity.
I don't doubt for a minte that the attorney jumped on this opportunity.
september63
Posts: 5,789
Mar 9, 2010 2:24pm
In a lawsuit. The individual is attached to the attorney filing the suit. Dont be ridiculous. Would be like saying that JJHuddle and Bucknuts arent the assholes, their attorney that sent Justin the letter was the a-hole.
C
Con_Alma
Posts: 12,198
Mar 9, 2010 2:30pm
Ridiculous? I'll try not to.
What I see is an attorney taking to the press an emphatic explanation of the reason for the suit being filed. I see an attorney giving examples to expand and clarify.
My attorney represents my position. My attorney may or may not use the examples and words I have in our discussions. Because of that I don't think it'sto ask if Ms. Lohan compared herself to Madonna and Oprah. I didn't see that anywhere...so I asked.
What I see is an attorney taking to the press an emphatic explanation of the reason for the suit being filed. I see an attorney giving examples to expand and clarify.
My attorney represents my position. My attorney may or may not use the examples and words I have in our discussions. Because of that I don't think it'sto ask if Ms. Lohan compared herself to Madonna and Oprah. I didn't see that anywhere...so I asked.
M
Manhattan Buckeye
Posts: 7,566
Mar 9, 2010 2:34pm
The interesting thing is what arguments are in the brief that show why Li-Lo is so famous, it certainly isn't due her recent film career. I doubt this will go anywhere, there's as much potential embarassment for her than there is any chance of substantive recovery.
C
Con_Alma
Posts: 12,198
Mar 9, 2010 2:36pm
...as were her attorney's comments. I agree. This will die.Manhattan Buckeye wrote:... there's as much potential embarassment for her than there is any chance of substantive recovery.
Glory Days
Posts: 7,809
Mar 9, 2010 2:40pm
gotta love how she went from this:
To this:
To this:
B
BCSbunk
Posts: 972
Mar 9, 2010 4:51pm
I have seen that commercial many times and not one single time have I thought of Lindsay Lohan.BCBulldog wrote: Did any of you ever even once think that commercial was implying the Lindsay character was modeled after Lohan until you read this article? I know I didn't. She needs to just go away.
THE4RINGZ
Posts: 16,816
Mar 9, 2010 4:52pm
She was my favorite part of that Herbie movie I had to take my daughter to.
Z
ZombieKiller
Posts: 817
Mar 9, 2010 4:54pm
If they said coked up baby named Lindsay..I would have to agree with her
Little Danny
Posts: 4,288
Mar 9, 2010 4:57pm
I thought what made Lohan famous was she did not wear any briefs.... (nyuk-nyuk)Manhattan Buckeye wrote: The interesting thing is what arguments are in the brief that show why Li-Lo is so famous, it certainly isn't due her recent film career. I doubt this will go anywhere, there's as much potential embarassment for her than there is any chance of substantive recovery.
september63
Posts: 5,789
Mar 9, 2010 5:23pm
and she alternately sucks mens private parts one day and womens private parts the next!
rookie_j70
Posts: 677
Mar 9, 2010 6:22pm
you serious clark?
Tigerfan00
Posts: 3,427
Mar 9, 2010 6:24pm
Lindsay, dont you think $100M is a little to much drug money to ask for all at once.
M
Manhattan Buckeye
Posts: 7,566
Mar 9, 2010 6:29pm
The $100M amount is equally incomprehensible as the claim. Without seeing the petition (the article has some general figures) I wonder how much, if any is due to lost employment opportunities...as if she's marketable now.Tigerfan00 wrote: Lindsay, dont you think $100M is a little to much drug money to ask for all at once.
O
ou1980
Posts: 877
Mar 9, 2010 11:45pm
Her lawyer may face fines from the California Bar....frivolous lawsuit