Cleveland Buck wrote: In before jjHuddle sues for copyright infringement.

Cleveland Buck wrote: In all seriousness, we do appreciate you putting up with this shit Justin. I was concerned about this all along, and saw it coming. In fact, my first post on this site was:

Cleveland Buck wrote: In before jjHuddle sues for copyright infringement.

tk421 wrote:

september63 wrote: Have anything to do with that certified letter?

I'd say so.

gut wrote:

tk421 wrote:

september63 wrote: Have anything to do with that certified letter?

I'd say so.

Shocking....I predicted something along these lines a few months ago, and was told such a case would be "laughed out of court".

dwccrew wrote:

Cleveland Buck wrote: In all seriousness, we do appreciate you putting up with this shit Justin. I was concerned about this all along, and saw it coming. In fact, my first post on this site was:

Cleveland Buck wrote: In before jjHuddle sues for copyright infringement.

Who's going to win the March Madness tourney?

queencitybuckeye wrote:

gut wrote:

tk421 wrote:

september63 wrote: Have anything to do with that certified letter?

I'd say so.

Shocking....I predicted something along these lines a few months ago, and was told such a case would be "laughed out of court".

Such a case likely would get laughed out of court, but to get someone laughed out of court still costs you a bunch of money.

In this case, not having a loser pays system is denying the little guy his day in court.

justincredible wrote:

queencitybuckeye wrote:

gut wrote:

tk421 wrote:

september63 wrote: Have anything to do with that certified letter?

I'd say so.

Shocking....I predicted something along these lines a few months ago, and was told such a case would be "laughed out of court".

Such a case likely would get laughed out of court, but to get someone laughed out of court still costs you a bunch of money.

In this case, not having a loser pays system is denying the little guy his day in court.

This.

Sure, I could fight this and I would likely win but I don't have the resources to find out. Bottom line, they know I am just one guy running this place and they are bullying me under the assumption that I don't have the money to fight it.

Society wrote:

justincredible wrote:

queencitybuckeye wrote:

gut wrote:

tk421 wrote:

september63 wrote: Have anything to do with that certified letter?

I'd say so.

Shocking....I predicted something along these lines a few months ago, and was told such a case would be "laughed out of court".

Such a case likely would get laughed out of court, but to get someone laughed out of court still costs you a bunch of money.

In this case, not having a loser pays system is denying the little guy his day in court.

This.

Sure, I could fight this and I would likely win but I don't have the resources to find out. Bottom line, they know I am just one guy running this place and they are bullying me under the assumption that I don't have the money to fight it.

Looks like that assumption is correct.

justincredible wrote:

Society wrote:

justincredible wrote:

queencitybuckeye wrote:

gut wrote:

tk421 wrote:

september63 wrote: Have anything to do with that certified letter?

I'd say so.

Shocking....I predicted something along these lines a few months ago, and was told such a case would be "laughed out of court".

Such a case likely would get laughed out of court, but to get someone laughed out of court still costs you a bunch of money.

In this case, not having a loser pays system is denying the little guy his day in court.

This.

Sure, I could fight this and I would likely win but I don't have the resources to find out. Bottom line, they know I am just one guy running this place and they are bullying me under the assumption that I don't have the money to fight it.

Looks like that assumption is correct.

Yeah, I mean, I don't know many 27 year old recently married men with a mortgage, 2 car payments and student loans that have (tens of ?) thousands of dollars in disposable income to fight a a court battle over a website that brings in very little money.

september63 wrote: Yea. pony up the 128 for the ambulance bill. So we dont have to go thru this again. I was thinking that earlier today. LOL Forgot to post it.

justincredible wrote:

september63 wrote: Yea. pony up the 128 for the ambulance bill. So we dont have to go thru this again. I was thinking that earlier today. LOL Forgot to post it.

I'm planning on it.

justincredible wrote: Yeah, I mean, I don't know many 27 year old recently married men with a mortgage, 2 car payments and student loans that have (tens of ?) thousands of dollars in disposable income to fight a a court battle over a website that brings in very little money.

j_crazy wrote: it's a good thing I'm not in charge because I'd fight them out of spite.

tk421 wrote: What are you complaining about Justin? Don't you know this site is worth over $200K? He's been playing us all for fools, raking in the money.

http://www.valuatemysite.com/www.freehuddle.com