Being a moron and fucking some nut job broad. Put himself in a bad position.Al Capone wrote:Where's the first strike?killer_ewok wrote:Three strikes you're out........Writerbuckeye wrote: Oh so one or two times isn't the limit for Ben...but THREE is?
Got it.
Very true. And, hell, fab4 had a reasonably witty one-liner tossed in! After reading what apparently is supposed to pass for insults, wit and snappy commentary here, the fact something made me feel something other than contempt AMAZED me!killer_ewok wrote:Like I give a shit if people say that he has gained weight and he is fat. It's true. LOLseptember63 wrote: Big Ben fans you better head to the serious business forum. Ben is now being roasted over there.
I think if Roethlisberger had any intention of settling he would have already done so. In fact, she already offered to settle for just a public apology and small donation to a battered woman's fund, likely to save face. Many have speculated that Harrah's is the real target (which an admission on Ben's part would serve nicely to further that cause), so your contention that he could be less than 100% innocent is nothing more than baseless speculation. She wouldn't be the first women to go for a money grab.queencitybuckeye wrote:I'll bet you $100 that he writes that woman a check. Does that mean he was guilty of rape? No. Does that mean that he behaved in a manner not 100% innocent? Absolutely yes.gut wrote: Being accused IN CIVIL COURT of rape, which any nutcase could go after anyone. A case which appears completely bogus from the start.
And Steelers fans don't do the same thing in thinking that all Browns fans are the same? GTFO already.Automatik wrote: Seriously do I have to say it AGAIN. You can't judge an ENTIRE fanbase by the statements of one or several fans.
Holy shit how stupid can you be?!
Who is looking the other way? As a Steeler fan I'm pretty pissed at the situation and I know A LOT that feel the same way.
Nope. Some are that way but I know some quality Cleveland fans such as BR1986FB and I don't have any problem saying so.Keebler wrote:And Steelers fans don't do the same thing in thinking that all Browns fans are the same? GTFO already.Automatik wrote: Seriously do I have to say it AGAIN. You can't judge an ENTIRE fanbase by the statements of one or several fans.
Holy shit how stupid can you be?!
Who is looking the other way? As a Steeler fan I'm pretty pissed at the situation and I know A LOT that feel the same way.
WTF did I ever do to you?killer_ewok wrote: Nope. Some are that way but I know some quality Cleveland fans such as BR1986FB and I don't have any problem saying so.
Just messin'.
The first one he is counter-suing for damages.queencitybuckeye wrote: Yeah, he's a swell guy who is the innocent victim of money-grubbing females taking advantage of his room-temperature IQ.
Over and over and over.
The party with the deep pockets trying to make the other party give up. Pretty obvious tactic.gut wrote:
The first one he is counter-suing for damages.
We don't, but to try to pretend that the first incident doesn't make it more likely that this particular smoke is indeed fire is just laughable.The second we don't even know if a crime was committed.
As likely as not, legitimately so.Certainly, the first one does make him an easier target.
I'm not saying both are after money, but the first has all kinds of issues
I would hope that you would stipulate that your client is a particularly stupid man, counsellor. Great athlete, but dumber than a plow handle.and the second had a lawyer before Big Ben did.
A small number for sure.Who knows what happened in the second incident?
Saying the same thing over and over doesn't make it true. When a settlement is announced, will you be up front enough to admit that it means more than someone just wants it behind them? Because it does. It absolutely does and will.But you're using cirular logic to use both cases to give the other more credibility when the first pretty obviously appears to be fraudulent.
My offer of a bet is open to you as well, sir. Care to back up your alligator mouth? BTW, the fanboi stuff at your age is pretty pathetic.rock_knutne wrote: ^^^^^Your post is nothing but pure speculation while gut gave some clear cut facts and points. Give it up hater!
sooooo, what you are saying is he...raped her?Al Capone wrote: The latest out of Georgia is that Ben's accuser AND her friends are refusing to cooperate with authorities. HMMMMM.
Link?Al Capone wrote: The latest out of Georgia is that Ben's accuser AND her friends are refusing to cooperate with authorities. HMMMMM.
+1Automatik wrote: I'm guessing they are starting to realize the case is bogus.
Want to make it $500 loud mouth?queencitybuckeye wrote:My offer of a bet is open to you as well, sir. Care to back up your alligator mouth? BTW, the fanboi stuff at your age is pretty pathetic.rock_knutne wrote: ^^^^^Your post is nothing but pure speculation while gut gave some clear cut facts and points. Give it up hater!
I haven't forgot about our bet durkie boy.DeyDurkie5 wrote:sooooo, what you are saying is he...raped her?Al Capone wrote: The latest out of Georgia is that Ben's accuser AND her friends are refusing to cooperate with authorities. HMMMMM.
This:Al Capone wrote: What is queeny betting on? I may take some action.
Yeah, Ben is going to write a check to a lady he lodged a counter suit against.:rolleyes:queencitybuckeye wrote:I'll bet you $100 that he writes that woman a check. Does that mean he was guilty of rape? No. Does that mean that he behaved in a manner not 100% innocent? Absolutely yes.gut wrote: Being accused IN CIVIL COURT of rape, which any nutcase could go after anyone. A case which appears completely bogus from the start.
Hey Capone, why don't you tell me where you heard that Tress only wanted to recruit Roethlishberger to OSU as a TE?Al Capone wrote: ...
