data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/989f1/989f1e46566142b570d1bd578015f3fb3e5faafe" alt="3reppom's avatar"
3reppom
Posts: 765
Nov 16, 2009 5:11pm
UC is making the changes he wants. The clauses linking the construction of a practice facility to a smaller buyout were taken out at Kelly's request when he signed his latest contract extension. The fields will be done by next fall and as the article says formal architectural studies are being conducted to renovate and expand Nippert Stadium. Michigan won't take a serious run at Brian Kelly unless the administration up there completely reverses their collective opinions of him. they didn't like what they found when they initially looked into him after Carr was let go. As for Notre Dame it could happen but it's unlikely at this point. There isn't even a whisper of contact at this point between Notre Dame and Kelly's people. Brian Kelly is throughly enjoying building UC's program, he has the entire city in his spell and is in a better situation right now on the field than what he would walk into at Notre Dame.
D
dat dude
Posts: 1,564
Nov 16, 2009 5:41pm
Right, because we all know how airtight a contract extension can be...centralbucksfan wrote:Well, ND better hurry as Stanford is currently working on a contract extension with Harbaugh.Hamp89 wrote: The more I see and read on Jim Harbaugh has me REALLY wanting him at ND.
If Harbaugh has any interest at all in heading to another school, you can believe there will be a provision to protect his interest. He has the upper hand in this negotiation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8a754/8a754729bd580a7fab0b723981fe7b9b2e43dd5d" alt="SportsAndLady's avatar"
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Nov 16, 2009 7:12pm
2 things:Vball10set wrote:sure I have--it's just that when I initially read S&L's post I thought she was comparing the two--brain cramp,dude!!!dat dude wrote:You've never heard the Woody Hayes' quote in re: to going for 2 against Michigan? Really?Vball10set wrote: wtf are you talking about? comparing Harbaugh to Woddy Hayes???
1) You call yourself an Ohio State fan, but can't recognize one of the most recognizable statements by the most most well known coach Ohio State has ever had?
2) Did you intentionally put 'she'? If so, you are a fucking loser.
S
sjmvsfscs08
Posts: 2,963
Nov 16, 2009 7:53pm
You can add Jim Harbaugh to the list of fantastic coaches that were born in Ohio. He was born in Toledo, Ohio.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a4ba0/a4ba0d9cff94d2e863d68378e1b2e6253bde6350" alt="killer_ewok's avatar"
killer_ewok
Posts: 11,379
Nov 16, 2009 8:48pm
A few of us ND fans have been talking about how much we want Harbaugh in South Bend for the last week or so. Not sure what the odds are but I'd love for him to be the next head football coach at Notre Dame.
V
vball10set
Posts: 24,795
Nov 17, 2009 8:11am
LOL--some things never change--2 things:SportsAndLadies wrote:2 things:Vball10set wrote:sure I have--it's just that when I initially read S&L's post I thought she was comparing the two--brain cramp,dude!!!dat dude wrote:You've never heard the Woody Hayes' quote in re: to going for 2 against Michigan? Really?Vball10set wrote: wtf are you talking about? comparing Harbaugh to Woddy Hayes???
1) You call yourself an Ohio State fan, but can't recognize one of the most recognizable statements by the most most well known coach Ohio State has ever had?
2) Did you intentionally put 'she'? If so, you are a fucking loser.
1.) your parents must STILL be so proud-especially with your langauge
2.) care to tell us what a Will,Sam and Mike linebacker are?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/118c7/118c7b2f936579e8a519ad63600cc64074a46559" alt="Skyhook79's avatar"
Skyhook79
Posts: 5,739
Nov 17, 2009 8:51am
Pete Carroll will remember this and he will embarrass Harbaugh if he stays at Stanford.
S
Society
Posts: 1,146
Nov 17, 2009 9:46am
WTF are you talking about! Will, Sam, Mike? What the f--- does that mean?! Ha Ha!Vball10set wrote:LOL--some things never change--2 things:SportsAndLadies wrote:2 things:Vball10set wrote:sure I have--it's just that when I initially read S&L's post I thought she was comparing the two--brain cramp,dude!!!dat dude wrote:You've never heard the Woody Hayes' quote in re: to going for 2 against Michigan? Really?Vball10set wrote: wtf are you talking about? comparing Harbaugh to Woddy Hayes???
1) You call yourself an Ohio State fan, but can't recognize one of the most recognizable statements by the most most well known coach Ohio State has ever had?
2) Did you intentionally put 'she'? If so, you are a fucking loser.
1.) your parents must STILL be so proud-especially with your langauge
2.) care to tell us what a Will,Sam and Mike linebacker are?![]()
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7c31a/7c31a46af98d5764bc2053a6a365e2674a9a9cf7" alt="derek bomar's avatar"
derek bomar
Posts: 3,722
Nov 17, 2009 9:58am
oh snap! hahahahah on the W,M, & S comment
N
Nate
Posts: 3,949
Nov 17, 2009 10:06am
I forgot about the Will, Sam and Mike comment. This just made my day. Thank you.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8a754/8a754729bd580a7fab0b723981fe7b9b2e43dd5d" alt="SportsAndLady's avatar"
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Nov 17, 2009 10:13am
I honestly do not see what's so funny about that...I didn't play football so I didn't know what a term meant...HAHAHAHAHAHAHHA hilarious! :rolleyes:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c1f2d/c1f2ded7c6560ed23a6b33a1b98ca3628d14812f" alt="darbypitcher22's avatar"
darbypitcher22
Posts: 8,000
Nov 17, 2009 10:14am
hopefully Harbaugh signs the extension and builds Stanford back up and challenges Pete Carroll and the Trojans every year for the next decade or so
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7c31a/7c31a46af98d5764bc2053a6a365e2674a9a9cf7" alt="derek bomar's avatar"
derek bomar
Posts: 3,722
Nov 17, 2009 10:16am
you don't have to play to know what they mean - they're referred to in just about any game by commentatorsSportsAndLadies wrote: I honestly do not see what's so funny about that...I didn't play football so I didn't know what a term meant...HAHAHAHAHAHAHHA hilarious! :rolleyes:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8a754/8a754729bd580a7fab0b723981fe7b9b2e43dd5d" alt="SportsAndLady's avatar"
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Nov 17, 2009 10:19am
Still..okay, I didn't know what a football term meant....OMG"S"SSSSZZZZZZZZZderek bomar wrote:you don't have to play to know what they mean - they're referred to in just about any game by commentatorsSportsAndLadies wrote: I honestly do not see what's so funny about that...I didn't play football so I didn't know what a term meant...HAHAHAHAHAHAHHA hilarious! :rolleyes:
V
vball10set
Posts: 24,795
Nov 17, 2009 10:50am
^^easy,big guy--it's all in fun--GO BUCKS!!!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/468a5/468a53cbd31063f79d9ab294ec3c37312f466c50" alt="j_crazy's avatar"
j_crazy
Posts: 8,372
Nov 17, 2009 11:27am
i know i'm young, but was stanford ever "up" to begin with?darbypitcher22 wrote: hopefully Harbaugh signs the extension and builds Stanford back up and challenges Pete Carroll and the Trojans every year for the next decade or so
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c1f2d/c1f2ded7c6560ed23a6b33a1b98ca3628d14812f" alt="darbypitcher22's avatar"
darbypitcher22
Posts: 8,000
Nov 17, 2009 12:27pm
they were a strong program in the late 60's early 70's... they beat the Supersophs in the Rose Bowl by 10 points behind Jim Plunkett
S
Swamp Fox
Posts: 2,218
Nov 17, 2009 1:03pm
Yet another horrific memory brought back to life. I remember watching it.darbypitcher22 wrote: they were a strong program in the late 60's early 70's... they beat the Supersophs in the Rose Bowl by 10 points behind Jim Plunkett
One more Rose Bowl disaster against the West Coast California teams and Jim Tressel can't even be blamed for it. I believe it was 27-17 and I still have nightmares about it.
V
vball10set
Posts: 24,795
Nov 17, 2009 1:17pm
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/468a5/468a53cbd31063f79d9ab294ec3c37312f466c50" alt="j_crazy's avatar"
j_crazy
Posts: 8,372
Nov 20, 2009 9:54am
I heard Pete Carroll's take today "It's in the past. Will I forget it? No. But, it's in the past."
First off, what the hell does that mean? Either it's in the past, or you will not forget. It can't be both.
Secondly, if Stanford is up by 27 points, there are a lot of things I'd remember before that 2-point attempt. Like how they got to be up 27 to begin with, and I'd try to do something to prevent that from happening again.
First off, what the hell does that mean? Either it's in the past, or you will not forget. It can't be both.
Secondly, if Stanford is up by 27 points, there are a lot of things I'd remember before that 2-point attempt. Like how they got to be up 27 to begin with, and I'd try to do something to prevent that from happening again.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b81d7/b81d797508339d578b8c5fd513ed2af3005382a9" alt="jordo212000's avatar"
jordo212000
Posts: 10,664
Nov 20, 2009 12:00pm
I don't really care for Petey, but I am with him here. You have to figure that big win was an anomaly. USC should and usually does beat Stanford (for the most part). So when Stanford pulls off the win they go and start trying to run the score up. Act like you've been there before Harbaugh. What goes around, comes around. I think it is safe to say that the next time Carroll and Trojans can run the score up, they will.j_crazy wrote: Secondly, if Stanford is up by 27 points, there are a lot of things I'd remember before that 2-point attempt. Like how they got to be up 27 to begin with, and I'd try to do something to prevent that from happening again.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/468a5/468a53cbd31063f79d9ab294ec3c37312f466c50" alt="j_crazy's avatar"
j_crazy
Posts: 8,372
Nov 20, 2009 12:14pm
I'm all for Pete winning by 65 next time they win. But like I said, I'd worry about rubbing it in as an after thought. My focus would be getting to that point.
V
vball10set
Posts: 24,795
Nov 20, 2009 12:21pm
you're right,jordo--with Stanford winning two out of the last three,they should be used to it..and as long as he's at Stanford,Harbaugh will continue to abuse whiney Petey
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b81d7/b81d797508339d578b8c5fd513ed2af3005382a9" alt="jordo212000's avatar"
jordo212000
Posts: 10,664
Nov 20, 2009 1:50pm
jordo212000 wrote:
You have to figure that big win was an anomaly. USC should and usually does beat Stanford (for the most part). So when Stanford pulls off the win they go and start trying to run the score up. Act like you've been there before Harbaugh. What goes around, comes around. I think it is safe to say that the next time Carroll and Trojans can run the score up, they will.
USC has the edge in the series 59-26 (with 3 ties) haha. So no Stanford really does not have a history of beating USC.Vball10set wrote: you're right,jordo--with Stanford winning two out of the last three,they should be used to it..and as long as he's at Stanford,Harbaugh will continue to abuse whiney Petey
You bring up the fact that Stanford has won 2 of 3. Interestingly, since 2002, Stanford is 2-6 against SC.
V
vball10set
Posts: 24,795
Nov 20, 2009 2:04pm
has Harbaugh been there since '02???
btw,I wonder if we should bring up graduation rates,admissions requirements,the Reggie Bush saga,etc.
btw,I wonder if we should bring up graduation rates,admissions requirements,the Reggie Bush saga,etc.