Good one :rolleyes:ross ford81 wrote: So Dunbar is "Nobody"?
It was not a guard issue. The issue was the spacing was so far apart the Dunbar speed made it easy to get in cat and mouse position. The coach left his good little point quard out to dry. The guys in the deep corners never came from behind the defense to the middle to help and attack. The also could have come up and set some high screens to get the point some space to see the floor. For a team that had not lost a game had no clue on how to attack the pressure. I would have thought they would have gotten a lot of easy layups. But Dunbar is really good so they put the fear in this team./wes_mantooth wrote: I still cannot figure how PC stayed in that game. Dunbar should have beat them by a good bit. PC just did not have the good ball handling guards to deal with Dunbar's tremendous press.
What team do you coach? How far did your team make it this season?!?sports_talk wrote:It was not a guard issue. The issue was the spacing was so far apart the Dunbar speed made it easy to get in cat and mouse position. The coach left his good little point quard out to dry. The guys in the deep corners never came from behind the defense to the middle to help and attack. The also could have come up and set some high screens to get the point some space to see the floor. For a team that had not lost a game had no clue on how to attack the pressure. I would have thought they would have gotten a lot of easy layups. But Dunbar is really good so they put the fear in this team./wes_mantooth wrote: I still cannot figure how PC stayed in that game. Dunbar should have beat them by a good bit. PC just did not have the good ball handling guards to deal with Dunbar's tremendous press.
So you disagree do you. How many coaches have Port Clintons talent????? Please just understand the comments. My guess they have not played against pressure as good as Dunbar. PC only had one guy handle the ball. Wonder why?bucks36 wrote:What team do you coach? How far did your team make it this season?!?sports_talk wrote:It was not a guard issue. The issue was the spacing was so far apart the Dunbar speed made it easy to get in cat and mouse position. The coach left his good little point quard out to dry. The guys in the deep corners never came from behind the defense to the middle to help and attack. The also could have come up and set some high screens to get the point some space to see the floor. For a team that had not lost a game had no clue on how to attack the pressure. I would have thought they would have gotten a lot of easy layups. But Dunbar is really good so they put the fear in this team./wes_mantooth wrote: I still cannot figure how PC stayed in that game. Dunbar should have beat them by a good bit. PC just did not have the good ball handling guards to deal with Dunbar's tremendous press.
Yeah, the spacing was not very good at all. I did feel bad for their PG, he was basically trying to beat the press by himself. I had always been taught that you beat a press like that by passing, not dribbling, but in fairness to PC.....Dunbar was more athletic than any team I ever played against.sports_talk wrote:It was not a guard issue. The issue was the spacing was so far apart the Dunbar speed made it easy to get in cat and mouse position. The coach left his good little point quard out to dry. The guys in the deep corners never came from behind the defense to the middle to help and attack. The also could have come up and set some high screens to get the point some space to see the floor. For a team that had not lost a game had no clue on how to attack the pressure. I would have thought they would have gotten a lot of easy layups. But Dunbar is really good so they put the fear in this team./wes_mantooth wrote: I still cannot figure how PC stayed in that game. Dunbar should have beat them by a good bit. PC just did not have the good ball handling guards to deal with Dunbar's tremendous press.
