It's the mono, right?!?!?!? :rolleyes:

#1 is problematic...

GoChiefs wrote: The way I see it is..if you don't like Sept..put him on your ignore list...it's not a hard concept to grasp. Don't reply..and he'll eventually quit. But when what he wants to do (**** you guys off) is working..why would he stop? Ignore him..and he will go away. You can't just ban someone b/c they have a different opinion than you. You guys talk as much crap about Dover/Hoover as he does about Massillon.

I disagree. Massillon people only talk crap about Hoover and Dover when the Hoover and Dover people provoke it. Big Al and september have long since worn out their welcome. Hoover has only beaten Massillon once and Dover got creamed the last time they tried causing them to break a contract with Massillon. Until Hoover and Dover schedule Massillon and live up to their contracts, those people have nothing to say that anyone cares to hear.

We Big Red people have total respect for Massillon. We definitely recognize their 22 state titles because they always had to go through Steubenville to win those titles. Massillon owned Big Red for decades, but you never heard us say bad things about them. I can't tell you how thrilled the Steubenville fans were to beat the Tigers last year, and we are hoping to do the same in 2010, although we know it will be a tough battle. And if Big Red didn't think Massillon runs a clean problem, we wouldn't play them.

No skank..it has nothing to do with giving anyone 'too much or not enough leash'. I deleted it b/c a) it has nothing to do with this topic and b) you are trying to do nothing but start **** b/c someone else said something. That's why this stuff won't die..they say something..so you feel the need to say something back..then they must retaliate in return. I know how you are..I can tell you are just like me..you want to always have the last word. Lol Unfortunately..that's why the stuff continues to go on and on and on.

FairwoodKing wrote: Massillon people only talk crap about Hoover and Dover when the Hoover and Dover people provoke it.

And I will disagree with that there. As I've seen posts about Dover/Hoover from certain posters on topics where Massillon was never even mentioned. I know the reasons for doing it...and I can't really blame them for doing it either. But I'm not supposed to let that kind of crap go on. And that's what I'm going to do.

GoChiefs wrote:

FairwoodKing wrote: Massillon people only talk crap about Hoover and Dover when the Hoover and Dover people provoke it.

And I will disagree with that there. As I've seen posts about Dover/Hoover from certain posters on topics where Massillon was never even mentioned. I know the reasons for doing it...and I can't really blame them for doing it either. But I'm not supposed to let that kind of crap go on. And that's what I'm going to do.

Then we will have to agree to disagree. I still don't see Massillon people doing much bashing. But they get bashed by all kinds of people.

FairwoodKing wrote: Then we will have to agree to disagree. I still don't see Massillon people doing much bashing.

I guess so..but I have read it with my own 2 eyes!

FairwoodKing wrote: But they get bashed by all kinds of people.

Won't argue that at all.

GoChiefs wrote:

FairwoodKing wrote: Massillon people only talk crap about Hoover and Dover when the Hoover and Dover people provoke it.

And I will disagree with that there. As I've seen posts about Dover/Hoover from certain posters on topics where Massillon was never even mentioned. I know the reasons for doing it...and I can't really blame them for doing it either. But I'm not supposed to let that kind of crap go on. And that's what I'm going to do.

You say you disagree with Fairwood about Massillon people only talking crap about Ho/Do when it's provoked, yet later you say "I know their reasons for doing it....and I can't really blame them for doing it either."

Meaning?

UA5 got busted!!!!!!!!!!!!

skank wrote:

GoChiefs wrote:

And I will disagree with that there. As I've seen posts about Dover/Hoover from certain posters on topics where Massillon was never even mentioned. I know the reasons for doing it...and I can't really blame them for doing it either. But I'm not supposed to let that kind of crap go on. And that's what I'm going to do.

You say you disagree with Fairwood about Massillon people only talking crap about Ho/Do when it's provoked, yet later you say "I know their reasons for doing it....and I can't really blame them for doing it either."

Meaning?

Stand off?

I love it!!!

$15 on skank!!!

coyotes22 wrote:

skank wrote:

GoChiefs wrote:

And I will disagree with that there. As I've seen posts about Dover/Hoover from certain posters on topics where Massillon was never even mentioned. I know the reasons for doing it...and I can't really blame them for doing it either. But I'm not supposed to let that kind of crap go on. And that's what I'm going to do.

You say you disagree with Fairwood about Massillon people only talking crap about Ho/Do when it's provoked, yet later you say "I know their reasons for doing it....and I can't really blame them for doing it either."

Meaning?

Stand off?

I love it!!!

$15 on skank!!!

I'll take GoChiefs!
He has the BIG delete button. I'm sure he will win!

GoChiefs Rulz!

skank wrote: You say you disagree with Fairwood about Massillon people only talking crap about Ho/Do when it's provoked, yet later you say "I know their reasons for doing it....and I can't really blame them for doing it either."

Meaning?

It means just what it says..I don't blame you for getting in the p***ing matches..I know you Massillon fans take a lot of crap. But just b/c I can't blame you..doesn't mean I can condone it and allow it to happen.

Gardens35 wrote: GoChiefs Rulz!

+1

coyotes22 wrote: $15 on skank!!!

BAN!

coyotes22 wrote: #1 is problematic...

You da man.



Check, Check.....Check 1,2....check.

Darkon wrote:

I'll take GoChiefs!
He has the BIG delete button. I'm sure he will win!

That all he has.

coyotes22 wrote: That all he has.

That's all I need!

...and Sue starts to giggle

GoChiefs wrote:

coyotes22 wrote: That all he has.

That's all I need!

Thats what she said. :s

Suggestion: A Massillon Tiger Roll Call Thread.

This thread has taken an interesting turn?

Update: This

Gardens35 wrote: Suggestion: A Massillon Tiger Roll Call Thread.

Coyote and skank need 2 threads to talk back and forth to each other or something? :huh:

Funny Guy