Can anyone post the video of the last two plays -- Springs game-winner and the Stanley miss?

Springs was barely touched on his last shot and he created any contact that came. Loving hacked Storm badly and even BCSN annoucners who are horrible admitted Storm was fouled and should have been at the line. SFS missed a few free throws as well that could have put them ahead late.

sorry,but he's the softest 6'11 frannie since Mike Kearney

vball10set wrote: sorry,but he's the softest 6'11 frannie since Mike Kearney

For a soft kid he sure did dominate the paint Friday. Not sure how many 17 year old kids finish that last play with a 6'7" kid chopping him on the forearm.

^^ And if Loving is 6'7" then so is Fockler and Yodzis because he was basically the same size as both of them. No way is Loving 6'7".

Agreed. Stanley did well Friday night. The WTOL tape is not conclusive on whether Loving fouled him or not. I had a excellent view of it Friday night from the stands, and it was a close call in my opinion. Wish there was a better video. On the Springs game-winner, if that play had occurred in the first quarter, Stanley would have probably been charged with a foul although it was not a hard bump.

dominate? he should've had 40...and for the record,the kid who "chopped" him is 15 years old,and a freshman--dominant players DO NOT let that happen...

the difference Friday night was that Springs finished even though he was fouled,and Storm didn't--'nuff said

Storm is not a dominant player, but he did well against SJJ and should be commended for it. Foul or not, the Stanley move to the basket was not an easy one to finish, and I doubt that it was against a "14 year old".

that's your opinion,but I'll bet of you ask Storm,he'll tell you he should have finished that move...he had a good game,but I feel there's still a lot more in that young man that needs to come out--maybe it will at the next level...

hookshot wrote: Agreed. Stanley did well Friday night. The WTOL tape is not conclusive on whether Loving fouled him or not. I had a excellent view of it Friday night from the stands, and it was a close call in my opinion. Wish there was a better video. On the Springs game-winner, if that play had occurred in the first quarter, Stanley would have probably been charged with a foul although it was not a hard bump.

Assuming you have a cable box, go to the VOD, find the game under BCSN and fast forward to the end of the game. There is a great view of the play where Storm is clearly fouled. The announcers acknowledge it and it is very obvious.

vball10set wrote: dominate? he should've had 40...and for the record,the kid who "chopped" him is 15 years old,and a freshman--dominant players DO NOT let that happen...

the difference Friday night was that Springs finished even though he was fouled,and Storm didn't--'nuff said

Springs was hardly touched and Storm got hacked, big difference. Do yourself a favor and watch the replay on BCSN and see how bad Loving hits Storm. Storm may not be the dominant force he should be but he has never missed a shot that bad before. He was fouled, the tape clearly shows it and the refs missed it. "Nuff said"

calm down,Little Doily(ask your dad)--but oh yes,he HAS missed a shot that bad before--at least twice during this game,as a matter of fact!!!

These nicknames worry me a little about my Dad haha.

Didn't miss anything that bad on Friday where he hit the side of the backboard like the final shot. But we agree to disagree.

^^all in fun,knight--your dad's a great guy....have a super day,and GO KNIGHTS!!!

LOL! Very much fun