Ohio Chatter
Ohio Chatter

Forums

All Threads Serious Business Sports Politics Archive Pick 'ems Wordio
Log In Create Account

Indian Creek 2010

Home ▸ Archive ▸ High School Football ▸ Indian Creek 2010
I

icskins

Senior Member

174 posts
Feb 4, 2010 1:37 AM
How about some football talk.
Feb 3, 2010 8:37pm
MANAZE's avatar

MANAZE

Senior Member

1,055 posts
Feb 4, 2010 2:30 AM
Dropping Big Red they should at least be able to go 8-2 this year. Idk if that will be enough to make the playoffs but it would nice to see the drought come to an end.
Feb 3, 2010 9:30pm
GoChiefs's avatar

GoChiefs

Resident Maniac

16,754 posts
Feb 4, 2010 2:32 AM
This will NOT turn into like the other 2 Creek threads. Keep it talk about INDIAN CREEK FOOTBALL. Any posts that stray beyond football will be deleted.
Feb 3, 2010 9:32pm
MANAZE's avatar

MANAZE

Senior Member

1,055 posts
Feb 4, 2010 2:33 AM
How many starters are coming back this year?
Feb 3, 2010 9:33pm
d.woods50fan.'s avatar

d.woods50fan.

Senior Member

451 posts
Feb 4, 2010 3:09 AM
creek lost a lot of seniors but had a decent freshman class that that should see time in 2010 as sophs ...
Feb 3, 2010 10:09pm
MANAZE's avatar

MANAZE

Senior Member

1,055 posts
Feb 5, 2010 9:43 AM
so is it going to be a rebuilding year then or will the sophs that will be playing good enough to replace those lost?
Feb 5, 2010 4:43am
I

icskins

Senior Member

174 posts
Feb 5, 2010 12:17 PM
I expect a team pretty similar to last year. There should be a few younger guys that contribute, overall the team will be smaller than a lot of others. I don't know what to say about wins/losses yet.
Feb 5, 2010 7:17am
Skin_Man's avatar

Skin_Man

Member

92 posts
Feb 5, 2010 12:17 PM
I would say like it will be more of a transition year. There is a solid group of letterman back.
Two line man one started the other played in every game, and played early.
The wide receivers all rotated last year and there are 2 of the 5 are back.
Two TE played and one is back.
QB Back and his backup (Backup should see time at WR)
RB is solid. FB is back, and the backup TB is back. He played more as the year went.

Defense is about the same story. They rotated 5 guys in the secondary and the same two that played WR are back.
The one has started every game for two years.
LB should be solid with two of the four starters back.
The d-line will have to replace 2 or 4 starters.
So to sum up the post there are guys that have played a lot, but there is a lack of depth that will have to filled by underclassman.
Go Creek.


(Thanks, GoChiefs)
Feb 5, 2010 7:17am
G

goldenwarrior

Member

42 posts
Feb 6, 2010 6:51 PM
How many do you expect to have in uniform on Friday nights this year? As I recall from some posts on here, there were only between 30 and 40 boys dressed this past year.
Feb 6, 2010 1:51pm
G

goldenwarrior

Member

42 posts
Feb 6, 2010 6:53 PM
Sounds like the skill postions are in decent shape, but the lines on both sides is what's in question.
Feb 6, 2010 1:53pm
wags6817's avatar

wags6817

Senior Member

218 posts
Feb 7, 2010 3:44 AM
The numbers should be right around 45 this year.
Feb 6, 2010 10:44pm
MANAZE's avatar

MANAZE

Senior Member

1,055 posts
Feb 7, 2010 5:17 AM
wow thats preety good for Creek. It'd be nice to see them hit the 60s in the next few years.
Feb 7, 2010 12:17am
Skin_Man's avatar

Skin_Man

Member

92 posts
Feb 7, 2010 7:13 PM
Creek had 60 in 2008 -2-8
2003- 1-9
2002 1-9
I am happy with 40 and 6-4
the 98, and 99 teams had between 30-40 9-1 8-2
Feb 7, 2010 2:13pm
B

BuckCreek

Member

53 posts
Feb 7, 2010 10:24 PM
I would be happy with 35 to 40 hard nosed players instead of 60 that includes a bunch of kids that are just happy to be on the team.
Feb 7, 2010 5:24pm
Skin_Man's avatar

Skin_Man

Member

92 posts
Feb 8, 2010 9:27 PM
I am with BuckCreek!
Feb 8, 2010 4:27pm
G

goldenwarrior

Member

42 posts
Feb 8, 2010 11:45 PM
Quality is always better than quantity. However, if they could get up in the 50-60 range with depth, that makes a big difference.
Feb 8, 2010 6:45pm
B

BuckCreek

Member

53 posts
Feb 9, 2010 7:28 PM
as the program improves I am confident the numbers will improve.
Feb 9, 2010 2:28pm
d.woods50fan.'s avatar

d.woods50fan.

Senior Member

451 posts
Feb 10, 2010 3:40 AM
I believe they will stay around 30 - 40 for a while ... lots of reasons
Feb 9, 2010 10:40pm
homefield's avatar

homefield

Senior Member

242 posts
Feb 10, 2010 5:23 AM
I was wondering if there is any truth to the rumor i heard last week that after the new middle school is completed in mingo that indian creek will be looking to build a new football stadium in mingo close to the new school?
Feb 10, 2010 12:23am
MANAZE's avatar

MANAZE

Senior Member

1,055 posts
Feb 10, 2010 5:44 AM
I have also heard a rumor that Creek wants to have the High School on the same land as the new junior high so if its true putting the football field there would make sense.
Feb 10, 2010 12:44am
F

FairwoodKing

Senior Member

2,504 posts
Feb 10, 2010 7:09 AM
Is there any way Creek could raise the money to build a new stadium? I know it was like pulling teeth to get the money for the new middle school.
Feb 10, 2010 2:09am
P

peoplerfunny

Member

81 posts
Feb 10, 2010 4:39 PM
FairwoodKing wrote: Is there any way Creek could raise the money to build a new stadium? I know it was like pulling teeth to get the money for the new middle school.
Whats wrong with Kettewell Stadium ?
Feb 10, 2010 11:39am
F

FairwoodKing

Senior Member

2,504 posts
Feb 11, 2010 2:38 AM
peoplerfunny wrote:
FairwoodKing wrote: Is there any way Creek could raise the money to build a new stadium? I know it was like pulling teeth to get the money for the new middle school.
Whats wrong with Kettewell Stadium ?
Nothing as far as I know. I'm not the one who brought up the subject.
Feb 10, 2010 9:38pm
homefield's avatar

homefield

Senior Member

242 posts
Feb 11, 2010 2:40 AM
peoplerfunny wrote:
FairwoodKing wrote: Is there any way Creek could raise the money to build a new stadium? I know it was like pulling teeth to get the money for the new middle school.
Whats wrong with Kettewell Stadium ?
There is nothing wrong with it as far as i am concerned and i think it has alot of history to it but i was told that some members of the school board want to create a campus atmosphere and have everything at one location and it would help with the tax base for the city.
Feb 10, 2010 9:40pm
F

FairwoodKing

Senior Member

2,504 posts
Feb 11, 2010 2:57 AM
homefield wrote:
peoplerfunny wrote:
FairwoodKing wrote: Is there any way Creek could raise the money to build a new stadium? I know it was like pulling teeth to get the money for the new middle school.
Whats wrong with Kettewell Stadium ?
There is nothing wrong with it as far as i am concerned and i think it has alot of history to it but i was told that some members of the school board want to create a campus atmosphere and have everything at one location and it would help with the tax base for the city.
Then that brings me back to my original question. If Creek has that much trouble raising money to build new school buildings, how in the world are they going to raise money for a stadium they don't need?
Feb 10, 2010 9:57pm