F
FairwoodKing
Posts: 2,504
Jan 31, 2010 1:23am
Every expert is predicting that the earth's population will be around 12 billion by the year 2050. I'm just glad I won't be around to see it.2quik4u wrote:You do realize thats earths population is going to start going down pretty soon.FairwoodKing wrote: I'm Pro-Choice. Scientists are in agreement that our planet can only successfully house about two billion people. We already have more than six billion with no end in sight. If we don't do something drastic to cut down on the population, our planet won't be able to house anyone. We are polluting the planet to death, we are using all the natural resources, and we are responsible for intense global warming. All this because people like to screw. Abortion is not the only solution, but it is a good one.
2quik4u
Posts: 4,388
Jan 31, 2010 1:26am
lol, who are these experts?FairwoodKing wrote:Every expert is predicting that the earth's population will be around 12 billion by the year 2050. I'm just glad I won't be around to see it.2quik4u wrote:You do realize thats earths population is going to start going down pretty soon.FairwoodKing wrote: I'm Pro-Choice. Scientists are in agreement that our planet can only successfully house about two billion people. We already have more than six billion with no end in sight. If we don't do something drastic to cut down on the population, our planet won't be able to house anyone. We are polluting the planet to death, we are using all the natural resources, and we are responsible for intense global warming. All this because people like to screw. Abortion is not the only solution, but it is a good one.
F
FairwoodKing
Posts: 2,504
Jan 31, 2010 1:35am
Scientists who know what they are talking about.2quik4u wrote:lol, who are these experts?FairwoodKing wrote:Every expert is predicting that the earth's population will be around 12 billion by the year 2050. I'm just glad I won't be around to see it.2quik4u wrote:You do realize thats earths population is going to start going down pretty soon.FairwoodKing wrote: I'm Pro-Choice. Scientists are in agreement that our planet can only successfully house about two billion people. We already have more than six billion with no end in sight. If we don't do something drastic to cut down on the population, our planet won't be able to house anyone. We are polluting the planet to death, we are using all the natural resources, and we are responsible for intense global warming. All this because people like to screw. Abortion is not the only solution, but it is a good one.
2quik4u
Posts: 4,388
Jan 31, 2010 1:39am
it will come to around 9 billion then start to go downFairwoodKing wrote:Scientists who know what they are talking about.2quik4u wrote:lol, who are these experts?FairwoodKing wrote:Every expert is predicting that the earth's population will be around 12 billion by the year 2050. I'm just glad I won't be around to see it.2quik4u wrote:You do realize thats earths population is going to start going down pretty soon.FairwoodKing wrote: I'm Pro-Choice. Scientists are in agreement that our planet can only successfully house about two billion people. We already have more than six billion with no end in sight. If we don't do something drastic to cut down on the population, our planet won't be able to house anyone. We are polluting the planet to death, we are using all the natural resources, and we are responsible for intense global warming. All this because people like to screw. Abortion is not the only solution, but it is a good one.
2kool4skool
Posts: 1,804
Jan 31, 2010 2:12am
Wait, I thought the media had a liberal agenda? What happened to that?
sleeper
Posts: 27,879
Jan 31, 2010 2:32am
Wikipedia states that the population will cap at 9 billion in 2050(according to IDB data), but that's just a prediction.
Also, abortion isn't about population control, its about expunging cells from a human body that the human does not want there. Fetuses are parasites and I fail to see how if the host does not want it, then it is no different than the host trying to rid themselves of a deadly virus.
Also, abortion isn't about population control, its about expunging cells from a human body that the human does not want there. Fetuses are parasites and I fail to see how if the host does not want it, then it is no different than the host trying to rid themselves of a deadly virus.
ts1227
Posts: 12,319
Jan 31, 2010 2:34am
only applies if you wear a tin foil hat2kool4skool wrote: Wait, I thought the media had a liberal agenda? What happened to that?
And that's simply because it cuts off at 2050, we have no idea if the prediction caps there or continues upward.sleeper wrote: Wikipedia states that the population will cap at 9 billion in 2050(according to IDB data), but that's just a prediction.
2quik4u
Posts: 4,388
Jan 31, 2010 2:40am
No its because the crude birth rate and Total fertility rate will be below sustaining rates and it will start to go down.ts1227 wrote:only applies if you wear a tin foil hat2kool4skool wrote: Wait, I thought the media had a liberal agenda? What happened to that?
And that's simply because it cuts off at 2050, we have no idea if the prediction caps there or continues upward.sleeper wrote: Wikipedia states that the population will cap at 9 billion in 2050(according to IDB data), but that's just a prediction.
F
FanOfCats
Posts: 127
Jan 31, 2010 3:39am
Just to follow your logic that abortion is population control, so is gay marriageFairwoodKing wrote: I'm Pro-Choice. Scientists are in agreement that our planet can only successfully house about two billion people. We already have more than six billion with no end in sight. If we don't do something drastic to cut down on the population, our planet won't be able to house anyone. We are polluting the planet to death, we are using all the natural resources, and we are responsible for intense global warming. All this because people like to screw. Abortion is not the only solution, but it is a good one.
F
FairwoodKing
Posts: 2,504
Jan 31, 2010 4:23am
Very true.FanOfCats wrote:Just to follow your logic that abortion is population control, so is gay marriageFairwoodKing wrote: I'm Pro-Choice. Scientists are in agreement that our planet can only successfully house about two billion people. We already have more than six billion with no end in sight. If we don't do something drastic to cut down on the population, our planet won't be able to house anyone. We are polluting the planet to death, we are using all the natural resources, and we are responsible for intense global warming. All this because people like to screw. Abortion is not the only solution, but it is a good one.
believer
Posts: 8,153
Jan 31, 2010 8:37am
I guess your mommy thought that you were a parasite worth keeping around.sleeper wrote: Wikipedia states that the population will cap at 9 billion in 2050(according to IDB data), but that's just a prediction.
Also, abortion isn't about population control, its about expunging cells from a human body that the human does not want there. Fetuses are parasites and I fail to see how if the host does not want it, then it is no different than the host trying to rid themselves of a deadly virus.
S
Sonofanump
Jan 31, 2010 8:39am
That was easy.believer wrote:I guess your mommy thought that you were a parasite worth keeping around.sleeper wrote: Wikipedia states that the population will cap at 9 billion in 2050(according to IDB data), but that's just a prediction.
Also, abortion isn't about population control, its about expunging cells from a human body that the human does not want there. Fetuses are parasites and I fail to see how if the host does not want it, then it is no different than the host trying to rid themselves of a deadly virus.
S
Sonofanump
Jan 31, 2010 8:40am
Sounds similar to something said in Germany in the 1930's.FairwoodKing wrote: I'm Pro-Choice. Scientists are in agreement that our planet can only successfully house about two billion people. We already have more than six billion with no end in sight. If we don't do something drastic to cut down on the population, our planet won't be able to house anyone. We are polluting the planet to death, we are using all the natural resources, and we are responsible for intense global warming. All this because people like to screw. Abortion is not the only solution, but it is a good one.
S
Sonofanump
Jan 31, 2010 8:43am
you left out earthquakes, tsunamis, serial killers and malaria.FanOfCats wrote: Just to follow your logic that abortion is population control, so is gay marriage
CenterBHSFan
Posts: 6,115
Jan 31, 2010 8:46am
FairwoodKing wrote: I'm Pro-Choice. Scientists are in agreement that our planet can only successfully house about two billion people. We already have more than six billion with no end in sight. If we don't do something drastic to cut down on the population, our planet won't be able to house anyone. We are polluting the planet to death, we are using all the natural resources, and we are responsible for intense global warming. All this because people like to screw. Abortion is not the only solution, but it is a good one.
Ahh, now I understand your urgency of feelings.
CenterBHSFan
Posts: 6,115
Jan 31, 2010 8:47am
2quik4u wrote:lol, who are these experts?FairwoodKing wrote:Every expert is predicting that the earth's population will be around 12 billion by the year 2050. I'm just glad I won't be around to see it.2quik4u wrote:You do realize thats earths population is going to start going down pretty soon.FairwoodKing wrote: I'm Pro-Choice. Scientists are in agreement that our planet can only successfully house about two billion people. We already have more than six billion with no end in sight. If we don't do something drastic to cut down on the population, our planet won't be able to house anyone. We are polluting the planet to death, we are using all the natural resources, and we are responsible for intense global warming. All this because people like to screw. Abortion is not the only solution, but it is a good one.
The same type of experts who blame human beings for "intense global warming".
believer
Posts: 8,153
Jan 31, 2010 9:02am
I was going to jump on that as well but it was too obvious.CenterBHSFan wrote:The same type of experts who blame human beings for "intense global warming".
HitsRus
Posts: 9,206
Jan 31, 2010 9:33am
believer wrote:I guess your mommy thought that you were a parasite worth keeping around.sleeper wrote: Wikipedia states that the population will cap at 9 billion in 2050(according to IDB data), but that's just a prediction.
Also, abortion isn't about population control, its about expunging cells from a human body that the human does not want there. Fetuses are parasites and I fail to see how if the host does not want it, then it is no different than the host trying to rid themselves of a deadly virus.
mommy could have been wrong.
BRF
Posts: 8,748
Jan 31, 2010 9:33am
This.Swamp Fox wrote: .....the right to air them should be protected. I think the network will ultimately have to decide if the lost revenue is worth it. Free enterprise usually has it's ways of controlling what goes over the airwaves.
And this subject is getting a good workout on our high school's student twitter site. Here is an issue that is "PRIT-TY" easy to find out who is a conservative and who is a liberal.
Q
queencitybuckeye
Posts: 7,117
Jan 31, 2010 9:42am
You're entitled to your own opinion, but not your own facts. This is factually untrue.tuskytuffguy wrote: That fetus never realizes or feels a thing.
HitsRus
Posts: 9,206
Jan 31, 2010 9:43am
FairwoodKing wrote: I'm Pro-Choice. Scientists are in agreement that our planet can only successfully house about two billion people. We already have more than six billion with no end in sight. If we don't do something drastic to cut down on the population, our planet won't be able to house anyone. We are polluting the planet to death, we are using all the natural resources, and we are responsible for intense global warming. All this because people like to screw. Abortion is not the only solution, but it is a good one.
So is mandatory sterilization. People can screw to their hearts content. The first person should be you.
We could all look forward to 'science based' government controlled population control. While we are at it, we could genetically screen out those with weakness, or with undesirable characteristics.
ytownfootball
Posts: 6,978
Jan 31, 2010 9:57am
On a related note, show us an add consisting of two gay men swapping saliva and we'd be certain to find out how conservative our country actually is. I couldn't even begin to imagine the backlash this would cause.BRF wrote:This.Swamp Fox wrote: .....the right to air them should be protected. I think the network will ultimately have to decide if the lost revenue is worth it. Free enterprise usually has it's ways of controlling what goes over the airwaves.
And this subject is getting a good workout on our high school's student twitter site. Here is an issue that is "PRIT-TY" easy to find out who is a conservative and who is a liberal.
Again, the safety CBS finds in hiding behind Tebow is the only reason we're seeing this add. It also adds false credibility to their assertion of being less than leaning toward the left, which I feel has more influence on their decision than what we're considering.
A
Al Bundy
Posts: 4,180
Jan 31, 2010 10:10am
Snickers ran an ad a few years ago with two guys kissing after eating a candy bar, then they had to do something manly after it happened. The gay groups complained about it.ytownfootball wrote:
On a related note, show us an add consisting of two gay men swapping saliva and we'd be certain to find out how conservative our country actually is. I couldn't even begin to imagine the backlash this would cause.
NNN
Posts: 902
Jan 31, 2010 11:13am
For what it's worth, CBS insists that this website never produced an actual offer to buy airtime or any documentation that they would be financially able to buy it. Basically, this happens every year...someone will attempt to grab attention by going after airtime that they can't possibly afford.
And I'll say this. If this ad consisted of nothing more than a typical dating service website (a couple holding hands, blah blah blah), there wouldn't be any issue. This is basically attempting to make a political statement by being as shocking as possible without resorting to hardcore porn.
So I'll ask again. How many ads have ever aired during a non-overnight time slot that featured a couple of any kind being over-the-top affectionate?
And I'll say this. If this ad consisted of nothing more than a typical dating service website (a couple holding hands, blah blah blah), there wouldn't be any issue. This is basically attempting to make a political statement by being as shocking as possible without resorting to hardcore porn.
So I'll ask again. How many ads have ever aired during a non-overnight time slot that featured a couple of any kind being over-the-top affectionate?
majorspark
Posts: 5,122
Jan 31, 2010 12:32pm
Usually when someone complains about people liking to screw. They are expressing angry feelings associated with their lack of being able to find someone who would like to screw them.FairwoodKing wrote: I'm Pro-Choice. Scientists are in agreement that our planet can only successfully house about two billion people. We already have more than six billion with no end in sight. If we don't do something drastic to cut down on the population, our planet won't be able to house anyone. We are polluting the planet to death, we are using all the natural resources, and we are responsible for intense global warming. All this because people like to screw. Abortion is not the only solution, but it is a good one.
As for the rest of your statement. Perhaps you should volunteer to take one for the team.