2quik4u
Posts: 4,388
Jan 19, 2010 9:23pm
O
ou1980
Posts: 877
Jan 19, 2010 9:24pm
[size=xx-large]COAKLEY JUST CONCEDED BY TELEPHONE TO BROWN [/size]
tk421
Posts: 8,500
Jan 19, 2010 9:25pm
HAHA! It's going to be a pissed off White House tonight.
fish82
Posts: 4,111
Jan 19, 2010 9:25pm
61% of Boston reporting...
53-46...as predicted.
Damn, I'm good. Look for me on cable soon.
53-46...as predicted.
Damn, I'm good. Look for me on cable soon.
O
ou1980
Posts: 877
Jan 19, 2010 9:27pm
[size=x-large]THE BOSTON TEA PARTY...
SCOTT BROWN R 843,516 53%
MARTHA COAKLEY D 736,627 46% [/size]
SCOTT BROWN R 843,516 53%
MARTHA COAKLEY D 736,627 46% [/size]
H
Hammerin'Hank
Posts: 151
Jan 19, 2010 9:29pm
How ironic.
M
Manhattan Buckeye
Posts: 7,566
Jan 19, 2010 9:30pm
Interesting, we saw what happened in New Jersey, what happened in Virginia (which we were a part of), and now Mass. The next few days should be very intriguing.
tk421
Posts: 8,500
Jan 19, 2010 9:31pm
So, I don't know if a President ever does this, but since this is a special election, anyone expect Obama to play nice and call to congratulate Brown? I doubt it.
M
Manhattan Buckeye
Posts: 7,566
Jan 19, 2010 9:34pm
O didn't congratulate Christie or McConnell. I didn't expect him too, that isn't what he should be dealing with, he should be dealing with a drowning administration and a U.S. economy that is tanking.
2quik4u
Posts: 4,388
Jan 19, 2010 9:35pm
I just read a joke from another site
The best thing Ted kennedy did for healthcare was die
kinda fucked up, but so true
The best thing Ted kennedy did for healthcare was die
kinda fucked up, but so true
G
georgemc80
Posts: 983
Jan 19, 2010 9:58pm
I really wonder why people can really say they are against healthcare for all....is it that bad of a thing to provide quality healthcare for all of this country.....???
E
eersandbeers
Posts: 1,071
Jan 19, 2010 10:02pm
ccrunner609 wrote:georgemc80 wrote: I really wonder why people can really say they are against healthcare for all....is it that bad of a thing to provide quality healthcare for all of this country.....???
You have to be kidding right? Not affected? Have you seen the ammount the $ this clown is spending?
The President doesn't spend anything so I have no why he receives the credit/blame.
The Congress does the spending.
Mr. 300
Posts: 3,090
Jan 19, 2010 10:04pm
Thank you voters of Massachusetts.
Mr. 300
Posts: 3,090
Jan 19, 2010 10:07pm
With the Brown win in Massachusetts.
majorspark
Posts: 5,122
Jan 19, 2010 10:10pm
If the president does not veto he gets to enjoy some of the blame.eersandbeers wrote:ccrunner609 wrote:georgemc80 wrote: I really wonder why people can really say they are against healthcare for all....is it that bad of a thing to provide quality healthcare for all of this country.....???
You have to be kidding right? Not affected? Have you seen the ammount the $ this clown is spending?
The President doesn't spend anything so I have no why he receives the credit/blame.
The Congress does the spending.
rookie_j70
Posts: 677
Jan 19, 2010 10:13pm
A Win for the good guys.
S
sjmvsfscs08
Posts: 2,963
Jan 19, 2010 10:14pm
I did the same thing. Maddow was so insane she made Chris Matthews look tolerable. After a few minutes I decided I didn't want to give them anymore of a ratings boost so I switched back.ccrunner609 wrote: I flipped over to see how the Dem lapdogs are reporting this on MSNBC.....totally falling on their faces.
The best line was from Maddow, "the voters are just completely out of touch with reality."
fish82
Posts: 4,111
Jan 19, 2010 10:15pm
AgBoy looks especially distraught. He must not have received my bouquet yet.ccrunner609 wrote: I flipped over to see how the Dem lapdogs are reporting this on MSNBC.....totally falling on their faces.
mucalum49
Posts: 1,639
Jan 19, 2010 10:25pm
Ah I just turned on MSNBC just to see that... Care to summarize?ccrunner609 wrote: Holy cow, Olberman just went on a rampage calling Brown everything under the sun.
E
eersandbeers
Posts: 1,071
Jan 19, 2010 10:28pm
Fair point. I just don't associate spending with the President as the spending policies are largely on Congress.majorspark wrote:
If the president does not veto he gets to enjoy some of the blame.
B
BCSbunk
Posts: 972
Jan 19, 2010 10:30pm
Wrong.rookie_j70 wrote: A Win for the good guys.
A win for the bad guys no matter who won that election unless it was the Libertarian.
You had two pieces of crap and one good candidate one of the pieces of crap won.
E
equus
Posts: 60
Jan 19, 2010 10:32pm
I didn't follow this very much, other than the ramifications for the country if each of the candidates won. But I was impressed with Mr. Brown when he told the moderator of the debate who kept calling it Ted Kennedy's seat that it is not Ted Kennedy's seat, it is the peoples seat.
I am so tired of the sense of entitlement that our politicians have, and whether or not he follows through and makes it the peoples seat, it was refreshing to hear...
I am so tired of the sense of entitlement that our politicians have, and whether or not he follows through and makes it the peoples seat, it was refreshing to hear...
Mr. 300
Posts: 3,090
Jan 19, 2010 10:33pm
Olberman was in complete meltdown mode tonight.
O
ou1980
Posts: 877
Jan 19, 2010 10:34pm
If he can win in Massachusetts, could he win the country.....????
I say [size=x-large]YES[/size]
I say [size=x-large]YES[/size]
B
BCSbunk
Posts: 972
Jan 19, 2010 10:35pm
A good trade off for what? Bigger government will be the end result. It was lose lose and no win no matter how you want to spin it.ccrunner609 wrote:Yeah bit this POC is cancelling out a bigger POC. Its a good trade off.BCSbunk wrote:Wrong.rookie_j70 wrote: A Win for the good guys.
A win for the bad guys no matter who won that election unless it was the Libertarian.
You had two pieces of crap and one good candidate one of the pieces of crap won.
The Republicans and Democrats are both equally worthless the people lose again.