Boston Tea Party....Republican Scott Brown Wins in Massachusetts Senate Election

Home Archive Politics Boston Tea Party....Republican Scott Brown Wins in Massachusetts Senate Election
O

ou1980

Senior Member

877 posts
Jan 19, 2010 9:24 PM
[size=xx-large]COAKLEY JUST CONCEDED BY TELEPHONE TO BROWN [/size]
Jan 19, 2010 9:24pm
tk421's avatar

tk421

Senior Member

8,500 posts
Jan 19, 2010 9:25 PM
HAHA! It's going to be a pissed off White House tonight.
Jan 19, 2010 9:25pm
fish82's avatar

fish82

Senior Member

4,111 posts
Jan 19, 2010 9:25 PM
61% of Boston reporting...

53-46...as predicted.

Damn, I'm good. Look for me on cable soon. :cool:
Jan 19, 2010 9:25pm
O

ou1980

Senior Member

877 posts
Jan 19, 2010 9:27 PM
[size=x-large]THE BOSTON TEA PARTY...
SCOTT BROWN R 843,516 53%
MARTHA COAKLEY D 736,627 46% [/size]
Jan 19, 2010 9:27pm
H

Hammerin'Hank

Senior Member

151 posts
Jan 19, 2010 9:29 PM
How ironic.
Jan 19, 2010 9:29pm
M

Manhattan Buckeye

Senior Member

7,566 posts
Jan 19, 2010 9:30 PM
Interesting, we saw what happened in New Jersey, what happened in Virginia (which we were a part of), and now Mass. The next few days should be very intriguing.
Jan 19, 2010 9:30pm
tk421's avatar

tk421

Senior Member

8,500 posts
Jan 19, 2010 9:31 PM
So, I don't know if a President ever does this, but since this is a special election, anyone expect Obama to play nice and call to congratulate Brown? I doubt it.
Jan 19, 2010 9:31pm
M

Manhattan Buckeye

Senior Member

7,566 posts
Jan 19, 2010 9:34 PM
O didn't congratulate Christie or McConnell. I didn't expect him too, that isn't what he should be dealing with, he should be dealing with a drowning administration and a U.S. economy that is tanking.
Jan 19, 2010 9:34pm
2quik4u's avatar

2quik4u

Senior Member

4,388 posts
Jan 19, 2010 9:35 PM
I just read a joke from another site

The best thing Ted kennedy did for healthcare was die

kinda fucked up, but so true
Jan 19, 2010 9:35pm
G

georgemc80

Senior Member

983 posts
Jan 19, 2010 9:58 PM
I really wonder why people can really say they are against healthcare for all....is it that bad of a thing to provide quality healthcare for all of this country.....???
Jan 19, 2010 9:58pm
E

eersandbeers

Senior Member

1,071 posts
Jan 19, 2010 10:02 PM
ccrunner609 wrote:
georgemc80 wrote: I really wonder why people can really say they are against healthcare for all....is it that bad of a thing to provide quality healthcare for all of this country.....???

You have to be kidding right? Not affected? Have you seen the ammount the $ this clown is spending?

The President doesn't spend anything so I have no why he receives the credit/blame.

The Congress does the spending.
Jan 19, 2010 10:02pm
Mr. 300's avatar

Mr. 300

Senior Member

3,090 posts
Jan 19, 2010 10:04 PM
Thank you voters of Massachusetts.
Jan 19, 2010 10:04pm
Mr. 300's avatar

Mr. 300

Senior Member

3,090 posts
Jan 19, 2010 10:07 PM
With the Brown win in Massachusetts.
Jan 19, 2010 10:07pm
majorspark's avatar

majorspark

Senior Member

5,122 posts
Jan 19, 2010 10:10 PM
eersandbeers wrote:
ccrunner609 wrote:
georgemc80 wrote: I really wonder why people can really say they are against healthcare for all....is it that bad of a thing to provide quality healthcare for all of this country.....???

You have to be kidding right? Not affected? Have you seen the ammount the $ this clown is spending?

The President doesn't spend anything so I have no why he receives the credit/blame.

The Congress does the spending.
If the president does not veto he gets to enjoy some of the blame.
Jan 19, 2010 10:10pm
rookie_j70's avatar

rookie_j70

Senior Member

677 posts
Jan 19, 2010 10:13 PM
A Win for the good guys.
Jan 19, 2010 10:13pm
S

sjmvsfscs08

Senior Member

2,963 posts
Jan 19, 2010 10:14 PM
ccrunner609 wrote: I flipped over to see how the Dem lapdogs are reporting this on MSNBC.....totally falling on their faces.
I did the same thing. Maddow was so insane she made Chris Matthews look tolerable. After a few minutes I decided I didn't want to give them anymore of a ratings boost so I switched back. :D The best line was from Maddow, "the voters are just completely out of touch with reality."
Jan 19, 2010 10:14pm
fish82's avatar

fish82

Senior Member

4,111 posts
Jan 19, 2010 10:15 PM
ccrunner609 wrote: I flipped over to see how the Dem lapdogs are reporting this on MSNBC.....totally falling on their faces.
AgBoy looks especially distraught. He must not have received my bouquet yet.
Jan 19, 2010 10:15pm
mucalum49's avatar

mucalum49

Senior Member

1,639 posts
Jan 19, 2010 10:25 PM
ccrunner609 wrote: Holy cow, Olberman just went on a rampage calling Brown everything under the sun.
Ah I just turned on MSNBC just to see that... Care to summarize?
Jan 19, 2010 10:25pm
E

eersandbeers

Senior Member

1,071 posts
Jan 19, 2010 10:28 PM
majorspark wrote:
If the president does not veto he gets to enjoy some of the blame.
Fair point. I just don't associate spending with the President as the spending policies are largely on Congress.
Jan 19, 2010 10:28pm
B

BCSbunk

Senior Member

972 posts
Jan 19, 2010 10:30 PM
rookie_j70 wrote: A Win for the good guys.
Wrong.

A win for the bad guys no matter who won that election unless it was the Libertarian.

You had two pieces of crap and one good candidate one of the pieces of crap won.
Jan 19, 2010 10:30pm
E

equus

Member

60 posts
Jan 19, 2010 10:32 PM
I didn't follow this very much, other than the ramifications for the country if each of the candidates won. But I was impressed with Mr. Brown when he told the moderator of the debate who kept calling it Ted Kennedy's seat that it is not Ted Kennedy's seat, it is the peoples seat.

I am so tired of the sense of entitlement that our politicians have, and whether or not he follows through and makes it the peoples seat, it was refreshing to hear...
Jan 19, 2010 10:32pm
Mr. 300's avatar

Mr. 300

Senior Member

3,090 posts
Jan 19, 2010 10:33 PM
Olberman was in complete meltdown mode tonight.
Jan 19, 2010 10:33pm
O

ou1980

Senior Member

877 posts
Jan 19, 2010 10:34 PM
If he can win in Massachusetts, could he win the country.....????


I say [size=x-large]YES[/size]
Jan 19, 2010 10:34pm
B

BCSbunk

Senior Member

972 posts
Jan 19, 2010 10:35 PM
ccrunner609 wrote:
BCSbunk wrote:
rookie_j70 wrote: A Win for the good guys.
Wrong.

A win for the bad guys no matter who won that election unless it was the Libertarian.

You had two pieces of crap and one good candidate one of the pieces of crap won.
Yeah bit this POC is cancelling out a bigger POC. Its a good trade off.
A good trade off for what? Bigger government will be the end result. It was lose lose and no win no matter how you want to spin it.

The Republicans and Democrats are both equally worthless the people lose again.
Jan 19, 2010 10:35pm