F
Footwedge
Posts: 9,265
Jan 16, 2010 5:29pm
If the Cards score here....would love to see an onside kick.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cf634/cf6344e971f74f14017a4472ce148b343ee82ff5" alt="Glory Days's avatar"
Glory Days
Posts: 7,809
Jan 16, 2010 5:30pm
these guys sound like a bunch of idiots. they start saying stuff before they even watch the replay. then when the replay comes on they sound like an idiot because of what actually happend is different than they said happend.Non wrote: the announcers always argue against the hits to the quarterback
come on that's an easy call they've made all year
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/781ec/781ec2a82a911f4fb64f4bedfcb50949ee9fcfc5" alt="Non's avatar"
Non
Posts: 9,517
Jan 16, 2010 5:30pm
Doucet with another nice play
first down
he's going to be real good moving forward
first down
he's going to be real good moving forward
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/781ec/781ec2a82a911f4fb64f4bedfcb50949ee9fcfc5" alt="Non's avatar"
Non
Posts: 9,517
Jan 16, 2010 5:31pm
touchdown Beanie
Cards get back within seven
21-14 Saints
Cards get back within seven
21-14 Saints
F
Footwedge
Posts: 9,265
Jan 16, 2010 5:32pm
Beanie walks in from the 5. Maybe Chris Berman's prediction will be right. He predicted Saints 77 and Cardinals 75. I hope so. I've got the Cards plus 7.
F
Footwedge
Posts: 9,265
Jan 16, 2010 5:33pm
Agree. The analyst is annoying to say the least. Time to use the mute button.Glory Days wrote:these guys sound like a bunch of idiots. they start saying stuff before they even watch the replay. then when the replay comes on they sound like an idiot because of what actually happend is different than they said happend.Non wrote: the announcers always argue against the hits to the quarterback
come on that's an easy call they've made all year
T
trackandccrunner
Posts: 1,283
Jan 16, 2010 5:35pm
Footwedge what was the over/under on this game? I didn't look at any of the lines for this game.
F
Footwedge
Posts: 9,265
Jan 16, 2010 5:36pm
57 points.trackandccrunner wrote: Footwedge what was the over/under on this game? I didn't look at any of the lines for this game.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/351ea/351ea2aac75aaabaf9b0be960047b4d5592a5e64" alt="Strapping Young Lad's avatar"
Strapping Young Lad
Posts: 2,453
Jan 16, 2010 5:39pm
Wow that was actually a tackle by a member of the AZ secondary. Just a yard late.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/781ec/781ec2a82a911f4fb64f4bedfcb50949ee9fcfc5" alt="Non's avatar"
Non
Posts: 9,517
Jan 16, 2010 5:39pm
might not hurt to have some fresh guys in there for Arizona
not the guys that ran around last week lol
not the guys that ran around last week lol
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/781ec/781ec2a82a911f4fb64f4bedfcb50949ee9fcfc5" alt="Non's avatar"
Non
Posts: 9,517
Jan 16, 2010 5:40pm
beautiful
flea flicker to Henderson
28-14
flea flicker to Henderson
28-14
T
trackandccrunner
Posts: 1,283
Jan 16, 2010 5:41pm
57 damn would have taken the over in that easily.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/781ec/781ec2a82a911f4fb64f4bedfcb50949ee9fcfc5" alt="Non's avatar"
Non
Posts: 9,517
Jan 16, 2010 5:42pm
I thought it would be higher than that.
42 now and there is another touchdown at least before half for 49
only eight needed in the second half
42 now and there is another touchdown at least before half for 49
only eight needed in the second half
F
Footwedge
Posts: 9,265
Jan 16, 2010 5:42pm
Well...that didn't take long. 28-14 on a flea flicker.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/781ec/781ec2a82a911f4fb64f4bedfcb50949ee9fcfc5" alt="Non's avatar"
Non
Posts: 9,517
Jan 16, 2010 5:43pm
Arizona just put together a clutch drive and then smoked again on defense
T
trackandccrunner
Posts: 1,283
Jan 16, 2010 5:44pm
The Cameraman just had a GOAT shot right there!
F
Footwedge
Posts: 9,265
Jan 16, 2010 5:44pm
Yes...that would have been the smart play. But that is a lot of points for a pro game.trackandccrunner wrote: 57 damn would have taken the over in that easily.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/351ea/351ea2aac75aaabaf9b0be960047b4d5592a5e64" alt="Strapping Young Lad's avatar"
Strapping Young Lad
Posts: 2,453
Jan 16, 2010 5:46pm
AZ plays pass defense like Minnesota.
T
trackandccrunner
Posts: 1,283
Jan 16, 2010 5:47pm
Yeah but this is Kurt Warner and Drew Brees its pretty much like an Arena game haha.Footwedge wrote:Yes...that would have been the smart play. But that is a lot of points for a pro game.trackandccrunner wrote: 57 damn would have taken the over in that easily.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/781ec/781ec2a82a911f4fb64f4bedfcb50949ee9fcfc5" alt="Non's avatar"
Non
Posts: 9,517
Jan 16, 2010 5:48pm
Will Smith interception
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/781ec/781ec2a82a911f4fb64f4bedfcb50949ee9fcfc5" alt="Non's avatar"
Non
Posts: 9,517
Jan 16, 2010 5:48pm
oh Warner is down
could be it for him
could be it for him
D
devil1197
Posts: 6,220
Jan 16, 2010 5:48pm
Wow Warner got f'n drilled.
F
Footwedge
Posts: 9,265
Jan 16, 2010 5:48pm
Ballgame...Season. Warner is in lala land.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/14400/144000e6c6dc9a44d7f191953e6087c63703724d" alt="Lovejoy1984's avatar"
Lovejoy1984
Posts: 5,277
Jan 16, 2010 5:49pm
Warner just had his lights turned out. I don't think he'll be back.
T
trackandccrunner
Posts: 1,283
Jan 16, 2010 5:49pm
I don't like seeing this. 1)Because I really like Warner and 2)If hes out there is no way the Cards are going to make this a game.