2010 Congressional Elections

Home Archive Politics 2010 Congressional Elections
Z

zhon44622

Senior Member

226 posts
Jan 10, 2010 8:15 PM
As the 2010 elections swing into action and the premise seems to be to campaign against our President, what exactly are the pinnacles of legislation that the GOP proposed or imposed during their control of congress between 1994 and 2006 that we may have forgot?
Jan 10, 2010 8:15pm
ptown_trojans_1's avatar

ptown_trojans_1

Moderator

7,632 posts
Jan 10, 2010 8:20 PM
Well, the budget issues of the 1990s come to mind.
Also, the 2004 Intelligence Reform Act. Some could even say, No Child Left Behind.
Jan 10, 2010 8:20pm
fish82's avatar

fish82

Senior Member

4,111 posts
Jan 10, 2010 8:25 PM
zhon44622 wrote: As the 2010 elections swing into action and the premise seems to be to campaign against our President, what exactly are the pinnacles of legislation that the GOP proposed or imposed during their control of congress between 1994 and 2006 that we may have forgot?
Well they balanced the budget, thus giving us that brief surplus that you people laughingly try and give Clinton 100% credit for all the time.
Jan 10, 2010 8:25pm
Z

zhon44622

Senior Member

226 posts
Jan 10, 2010 8:36 PM
Doesn't the balanced budget become a moot point with the subsequent six years under Bush?

(as far as the "you people" - Believe it or not there are a lot of folks who dont play the US vs THEM game and are the independents who in reality are the ones who are actually responsible for who gets elected. While I am quite liberal when it comes to the social issues, I am polar opposite when it comes to the fiscal side.)
Jan 10, 2010 8:36pm
Z

zhon44622

Senior Member

226 posts
Jan 10, 2010 8:38 PM
ptown_trojans_1 wrote: Well, the budget issues of the 1990s come to mind.
Also, the 2004 Intelligence Reform Act. Some could even say, No Child Left Behind.
What are the successes of No Child Left Behind that immediately come to your head?
Jan 10, 2010 8:38pm
Writerbuckeye's avatar

Writerbuckeye

Senior Member

4,745 posts
Jan 10, 2010 9:04 PM
Personally, I think NCLB is one of the biggest boondoggles in federal history.

I don't want the feds involved in education. Period.

That is a state responsibility.

Also, I didn't realize the GOP was completely in charge of Congress for 12 years. When did that happen and how did I miss it?
Jan 10, 2010 9:04pm
Z

zhon44622

Senior Member

226 posts
Jan 10, 2010 9:08 PM
Writerbuckeye wrote: Personally, I think NCLB is one of the biggest boondoggles in federal history.

I don't want the feds involved in education. Period.

That is a state responsibility.

Also, I didn't realize the GOP was completely in charge of Congress for 12 years. When did that happen and how did I miss it?
In 2000 the senate became evenly split - which gave Cheney the deciding vote and therefore control.
Jan 10, 2010 9:08pm
Writerbuckeye's avatar

Writerbuckeye

Senior Member

4,745 posts
Jan 10, 2010 9:13 PM
That's not 12 years. Thus my point.
Jan 10, 2010 9:13pm
Z

zhon44622

Senior Member

226 posts
Jan 10, 2010 9:34 PM
Writerbuckeye wrote: That's not 12 years. Thus my point.
The had greater control from 94-00 and continued to have half plus Cheneys vote untill 06 - thus 12 years
Jan 10, 2010 9:34pm
2

2trap_4ever

Member

38 posts
Jan 10, 2010 10:54 PM
I think the bigger question is what has this Democrat lead Congress gave us other than debt beyond our wildest dreams.
Jan 10, 2010 10:54pm
Writerbuckeye's avatar

Writerbuckeye

Senior Member

4,745 posts
Jan 10, 2010 10:57 PM
zhon44622 wrote:
Writerbuckeye wrote: That's not 12 years. Thus my point.
The had greater control from 94-00 and continued to have half plus Cheneys vote untill 06 - thus 12 years
You must be a Democrat. They're notoriously bad at math.
Jan 10, 2010 10:57pm
Z

zhon44622

Senior Member

226 posts
Jan 10, 2010 10:59 PM
Writerbuckeye wrote:
zhon44622 wrote:
Writerbuckeye wrote: That's not 12 years. Thus my point.
The had greater control from 94-00 and continued to have half plus Cheneys vote untill 06 - thus 12 years
You must be a Democrat. They're notoriously bad at math.
1994-2006 is 12 years..
Jan 10, 2010 10:59pm
I

I Wear Pants

Senior Member

16,223 posts
Jan 10, 2010 11:18 PM
zhon44622 wrote: As the 2010 elections swing into action and the premise seems to be to campaign against our President, what exactly are the pinnacles of legislation that the GOP proposed or imposed during their control of congress between 1994 and 2006 that we may have forgot?
Wonderful things like No Child Left Behind, the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, the Patriot Act, etc.

Edit: Before someone jumps down my throat about it, I was being incredibly sarcastic. Those are all atrocities of bills.
Jan 10, 2010 11:18pm
G

Ghmothwdwhso

Senior Member

534 posts
Jan 11, 2010 1:22 AM
zhon44622 wrote: Doesn't the balanced budget become a moot point with the subsequent six years under Bush?

(as far as the "you people" - Believe it or not there are a lot of folks who dont play the US vs THEM game and are the independents who in reality are the ones who are actually responsible for who gets elected. While I am quite liberal when it comes to the social issues, I am polar opposite when it comes to the fiscal side.)
Please vote for the Independent candiate next time.
Jan 11, 2010 1:22am
G

Ghmothwdwhso

Senior Member

534 posts
Jan 11, 2010 1:25 AM
Writerbuckeye wrote: Personally, I think NCLB is one of the biggest boondoggles in federal history.

I don't want the feds involved in education. Period.

That is a state responsibility.

Also, I didn't realize the GOP was completely in charge of Congress for 12 years. When did that happen and how did I miss it?
It is not (or shouldn't be) a State responsibility, it is a family responsibility. The familiy is responsible for raising their offspring, with or without help from their immediate community, as they see fit.
Jan 11, 2010 1:25am
Z

zhon44622

Senior Member

226 posts
Jan 11, 2010 2:57 AM
Ghmothwdwhso wrote:
zhon44622 wrote: Doesn't the balanced budget become a moot point with the subsequent six years under Bush?

(as far as the "you people" - Believe it or not there are a lot of folks who dont play the US vs THEM game and are the independents who in reality are the ones who are actually responsible for who gets elected. While I am quite liberal when it comes to the social issues, I am polar opposite when it comes to the fiscal side.)
Please vote for the Independent candiate next time.
Ill vote for the candidate i feel is best suited to do the job.
Jan 11, 2010 2:57am
Z

zhon44622

Senior Member

226 posts
Jan 11, 2010 9:47 PM
So we have come up with 3 highly disputed pieces of legislation?
Jan 11, 2010 9:47pm
B

BoatShoes

Senior Member

5,703 posts
Jan 11, 2010 11:03 PM
Ghmothwdwhso wrote:
Writerbuckeye wrote: Personally, I think NCLB is one of the biggest boondoggles in federal history.

I don't want the feds involved in education. Period.

That is a state responsibility.

Also, I didn't realize the GOP was completely in charge of Congress for 12 years. When did that happen and how did I miss it?
It is not (or shouldn't be) a State responsibility, it is a family responsibility. The familiy is responsible for raising their offspring, with or without help from their immediate community, as they see fit.
Not taking a side either way...but suppose a child is born to really bad parents...she has no choice as to who her parents are, even one's who willingly or negligently fail to educate their children. Does a state or a community have some kind of obligation to provide that child an education?
Jan 11, 2010 11:03pm
Writerbuckeye's avatar

Writerbuckeye

Senior Member

4,745 posts
Jan 11, 2010 11:03 PM
Ghmothwdwhso wrote:
Writerbuckeye wrote: Personally, I think NCLB is one of the biggest boondoggles in federal history.

I don't want the feds involved in education. Period.

That is a state responsibility.

Also, I didn't realize the GOP was completely in charge of Congress for 12 years. When did that happen and how did I miss it?
It is not (or shouldn't be) a State responsibility, it is a family responsibility. The familiy is responsible for raising their offspring, with or without help from their immediate community, as they see fit.
Don't parse with me. If it's done at the local level, then the state will have some of the responsibility; which is how the founders envisioned it, as opposed to having the feds so involved. I happen to agree with you.
Jan 11, 2010 11:03pm
Z

zhon44622

Senior Member

226 posts
Jan 18, 2010 12:33 PM
I guess i assumed with the "conservative circle jerk" that this site has been referred to, I would be able to have somebody bring up some issues that may have been forgotten. I guess that I was wrong.
Jan 18, 2010 12:33pm
C

cbus4life

Ignorant

2,849 posts
Jan 18, 2010 12:41 PM
You need to bring up something about the media to get the conservative circle jerk really going.
Jan 18, 2010 12:41pm
fish82's avatar

fish82

Senior Member

4,111 posts
Jan 18, 2010 1:52 PM
zhon44622 wrote: I guess i assumed with the "conservative circle jerk" that this site has been referred to, I would be able to have somebody bring up some issues that may have been forgotten. I guess that I was wrong.
It's only referred to as that by the pansies tired of getting their asses kicked for 12 months...seems they're finding that playing defense isn't nearly as fun as playing offense. ;)
Jan 18, 2010 1:52pm
Z

zhon44622

Senior Member

226 posts
Jan 18, 2010 3:29 PM
fish82 wrote:
zhon44622 wrote: I guess i assumed with the "conservative circle jerk" that this site has been referred to, I would be able to have somebody bring up some issues that may have been forgotten. I guess that I was wrong.
It's only referred to as that by the pansies tired of getting their asses kicked for 12 months...seems they're finding that playing defense isn't nearly as fun as playing offense. ;)
As your response to the question seems to be one of Defense you seem to be speaking of yourself, perhaps you could go on offense and answer the initial question.
Jan 18, 2010 3:29pm
fish82's avatar

fish82

Senior Member

4,111 posts
Jan 18, 2010 6:03 PM
zhon44622 wrote:
fish82 wrote:
zhon44622 wrote: I guess i assumed with the "conservative circle jerk" that this site has been referred to, I would be able to have somebody bring up some issues that may have been forgotten. I guess that I was wrong.
It's only referred to as that by the pansies tired of getting their asses kicked for 12 months...seems they're finding that playing defense isn't nearly as fun as playing offense. ;)
As your response to the question seems to be one of Defense you seem to be speaking of yourself, perhaps you could go on offense and answer the initial question.
I already did. Read back.

Sidebar: You need a new avatar. That's the gayest tornado I've ever seen. :heart:
Jan 18, 2010 6:03pm
Apple's avatar

Apple

Prost!

2,620 posts
Jan 18, 2010 6:15 PM
Welfare reform was a big success that the republicrats brought WJC kicking and dragging to finally sign.
Jan 18, 2010 6:15pm