A
Al Capone
Posts: 1,727
Jan 11, 2010 10:37pm
If you think stinco would be the #1 receiver on the Steelers, you my friend are either on crack or dont know anything about football.
A
Al Capone
Posts: 1,727
Jan 11, 2010 10:39pm
Plus you're a Browns fan so I dont think we can have an intelligent conversation about football if you know what I mean.
DeyDurkie5
Posts: 11,324
Jan 11, 2010 10:41pm
Since 2001....Al Capone wrote: If you think stinco would be the #1 receiver on the Steelers, you my friend are either on crack or dont know anything about football.
Ocho- 684 receptions 9952 yards receiving 62 td's
Ward 771 receptions 8416 yards receiving 67 td's
Almost even in production...SO like i said, ocho 1 with Ward a very close 2nd.
If you think ocho wouldn't be a top 3 on the Steelers, you sir are a fucking moron
DeyDurkie5
Posts: 11,324
Jan 11, 2010 10:42pm
how does my team sucking have anything to do with my sports knowledge? lol are you 10 years old? or a steelers version of NCF?Al Capone wrote: Plus you're a Browns fan so I dont think we can have an intelligent conversation about football if you know what I mean.
Lovejoy1984
Posts: 5,277
Jan 11, 2010 10:42pm
As an impartial observer, Ochiocinco would be the #1 WR on the Steelers, and if Al Capone thinks different, it's clearly Bias.
DeyDurkie5
Posts: 11,324
Jan 11, 2010 10:46pm
thank you for the logicHighRoller74 wrote: As an impartial observer, Ochiocinco would be the #1 WR on the Steelers, and if Al Capone thinks different, it's clearly Bias.
A
Al Capone
Posts: 1,727
Jan 11, 2010 10:46pm
Stinko= no playoff winsDeyDurkie5 wrote:Since 2001....Al Capone wrote: If you think stinco would be the #1 receiver on the Steelers, you my friend are either on crack or dont know anything about football.
Ocho- 684 receptions 9952 yards receiving 62 td's
Ward 771 receptions 8416 yards receiving 67 td's
Almost even in production...SO like i said, ocho 1 with Ward a very close 2nd.
If you think ocho wouldn't be a top 3 on the Steelers, you sir are a fucking moron
Ward= 2 Super bowl rings
Who would you rather be? hahaha
DeyDurkie5
Posts: 11,324
Jan 11, 2010 10:48pm
Al Capone wrote:Stinko= no playoff winsDeyDurkie5 wrote:Since 2001....Al Capone wrote: If you think stinco would be the #1 receiver on the Steelers, you my friend are either on crack or dont know anything about football.
Ocho- 684 receptions 9952 yards receiving 62 td's
Ward 771 receptions 8416 yards receiving 67 td's
Almost even in production...SO like i said, ocho 1 with Ward a very close 2nd.
If you think ocho wouldn't be a top 3 on the Steelers, you sir are a fucking moron
Ward= 2 Super bowl rings
Who would you rather be? hahaha
I am not arguing that you dense fuck, I am arguing that Ocho would be a number 1 receiver on the steelers, and I'm right..so lick my balls
Lovejoy1984
Posts: 5,277
Jan 11, 2010 10:49pm
Al,
Why does everything come back to rings with you? Is that the only thing you have to fall back on. Rings are team awards, not individual accomplishments.
Charlie Batch also has 2 SB rings, is he a better QB than Carson Palmer? Or Joe Flacco??
I would've included DA or BQ, but Batch is better than those too
Why does everything come back to rings with you? Is that the only thing you have to fall back on. Rings are team awards, not individual accomplishments.
Charlie Batch also has 2 SB rings, is he a better QB than Carson Palmer? Or Joe Flacco??
I would've included DA or BQ, but Batch is better than those too
Terry_Tate
Posts: 7,606
Jan 11, 2010 10:51pm
T-7th in TDs amongst WRs
18th in Yards amongst WRs
17th in catches amongst WRs
All on the team that was 27th in passing attempts. I'm not arguing for him to be top 10 or anything, but he's definitely better than the 25th WR in the NFL.
18th in Yards amongst WRs
17th in catches amongst WRs
All on the team that was 27th in passing attempts. I'm not arguing for him to be top 10 or anything, but he's definitely better than the 25th WR in the NFL.
A
Al Capone
Posts: 1,727
Jan 11, 2010 10:53pm
I am just saying that Stinko would have trouble finding playing time with the Steelers. You are a ratard if you think he would be the #1.
I
I Wear Pants
Posts: 16,223
Jan 11, 2010 10:55pm
I love the Steelers and I know that Chad Johnson would be a starting receiver. He'd probably be two or maybe even three on the roster though.
A
Al Capone
Posts: 1,727
Jan 11, 2010 10:55pm
#1 in running his mouthTerry_Tate wrote: T-7th in TDs amongst WRs
18th in Yards amongst WRs
17th in catches amongst WRs
All on the team that was 27th in passing attempts. I'm not arguing for him to be top 10 or anything, but he's definitely better than the 25th WR in the NFL.
#1 in not backing it up
DeyDurkie5
Posts: 11,324
Jan 11, 2010 10:56pm
and you love steeler dick...i'm done with this argument, enjoy that ward cream sauceAl Capone wrote: I am just saying that Stinko would have trouble finding playing time with the Steelers. You are a ratard if you think he would be the #1.
Lovejoy1984
Posts: 5,277
Jan 11, 2010 10:56pm
Ochocinco would be at worst the #3 for the Steelers. But he could very easily be the #1, or #2. Ward, and Holmes are very good receivers, but it isn't like either one of them are on the same level as a T.O., Jerry Rice, or Randy Moss(All-Time Greats and 1st Ballot HOF). Same goes with Ochocinco, he is very good receiver, and if he was on the Steelers, he'd have no problem seeing the field, and to think otherwise is foolish.Al Capone wrote: I am just saying that Stinko would have trouble finding playing time with the Steelers. You are a ratard if you think he would be the #1.
Terry_Tate
Posts: 7,606
Jan 11, 2010 11:00pm
With all this arguing about the Steelers and Chad, I think the Steelers have good WRs for what they have and Chad is good for what the Bengals do. Chad can't block as well as Hines, but there's no debate he definitely runs better routes than anyone on the Steelers. Their WRs are good for just playing more or less background football as Big Ben is usually escaping the pocket and creating plays, whereas the Bengals and Carson really don't do that, he needs WRs that run crisp routes, which Chad does as good as anyone.
A
Al Capone
Posts: 1,727
Jan 11, 2010 11:07pm
Ward = Hall of fameDeyDurkie5 wrote:and you love steeler dick...i'm done with this argument, enjoy that ward cream sauceAl Capone wrote: I am just saying that Stinko would have trouble finding playing time with the Steelers. You are a ratard if you think he would be the #1.
Stinko= I dont think so
DeyDurkie5
Posts: 11,324
Jan 11, 2010 11:11pm
lol I don't care if either make it, I'M A BROWNS FAN. I'm just trying to point out how biased you areAl Capone wrote:Ward = Hall of fameDeyDurkie5 wrote:and you love steeler dick...i'm done with this argument, enjoy that ward cream sauceAl Capone wrote: I am just saying that Stinko would have trouble finding playing time with the Steelers. You are a ratard if you think he would be the #1.
Stinko= I dont think so
A
Al Capone
Posts: 1,727
Jan 11, 2010 11:11pm
Ask Keith Rivers what he thinks of Ward? Oh I forgot, He cant talk yet.
G
gut
Posts: 15,058
Jan 12, 2010 4:59am
You guys are crazy. I'm a Steeler fan, and Ward would not beat out Ocho. Ward has the intangibles, but Ocho is just that much more of a threat receiving. I love Ward as a player and he's my all-time favorite Steeler, but the guy can't beat man coverage any more. He makes his living against zones.
I also don't think Holmes has surpassed Ocho yet. But there's a legit debate there.
I also don't think Holmes has surpassed Ocho yet. But there's a legit debate there.
Rotinaj
Posts: 7,699
Jan 12, 2010 10:22am
When both careers are over "stinko" will have better career numbers than Ward.Al Capone wrote:Ward = Hall of fameDeyDurkie5 wrote:and you love steeler dick...i'm done with this argument, enjoy that ward cream sauceAl Capone wrote: I am just saying that Stinko would have trouble finding playing time with the Steelers. You are a ratard if you think he would be the #1.
Stinko= I dont think so
Skyhook79
Posts: 5,739
Jan 12, 2010 10:33am
Maybe so but he won't be a Hall of Famer and won't be the winner that Ward is and isn't that what its all about? Winning Rings and getting to the HOF?Rotinaj wrote:When both careers are over "stinko" will have better career numbers than Ward.Al Capone wrote:Ward = Hall of fameDeyDurkie5 wrote:and you love steeler dick...i'm done with this argument, enjoy that ward cream sauceAl Capone wrote: I am just saying that Stinko would have trouble finding playing time with the Steelers. You are a ratard if you think he would be the #1.
Stinko= I dont think so
btw- I can't stand Hines anymore than I can Chad but at least Hines backs his trash talk up.