Commander of Awesome
Posts: 23,151
Nov 1, 2017 2:57pm
I would ask why the browns didn't sign him earlier if QB was such a fucking problem. God damn imbeciles.BR1986FB;1879801 wrote:Agreed.
To piggyback on their fucktardery, has anyone else heard anything about them possibly signing Kaepernick? Some word going around that either the Cards, Colts are Browns are supposed to sign him shortly. This would smack of a Sashi desperation move, at this point.
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
Nov 1, 2017 3:37pm
This thing stinks of complete desperation. Whiffed on Garoppolo and then they tried to save face with McCarron. Not saying they'd sign Kaep but that's a panic move too. If Haslam has a brain he says "nope, assets are frozen....you guys aren't making any moves."Commander of Awesome;1879804 wrote:I would ask why the browns didn't sign him earlier if QB was such a fucking problem. God damn imbeciles.
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Nov 1, 2017 4:00pm
That’s your opinion and it’s a shitty one.kizer permanente;1879793 wrote:The run defense is good because we’ve acquired talent on the line. It has nothing to do with Gregg Williams..
Defense has greatly improved, but yeah the d coordinator sucks because SQ sees too many schemes where the safety is playing too deep for his liking. Smh
iclfan2
Posts: 6,360
Nov 1, 2017 4:08pm
Haven't heard that. Hard fucking pass. Don't see any way in which Haslam allows that.BR1986FB;1879801 wrote:Agreed.
To piggyback on their fucktardery, has anyone else heard anything about them possibly signing Kaepernick? Some word going around that either the Cards, Colts are Browns are supposed to sign him shortly. This would smack of a Sashi desperation move, at this point.
salto
Posts: 2,611
Nov 1, 2017 4:16pm
Commander of Awesome;1879770 wrote:https://twitter.com/AllbrightNFL/status/925765851717890048
Jan is coming early in Cleveland this yr. SMH
Great reply -
[FONT=&]The Implication‏ @ClarkeMoore 3h3 hours ago-
[/FONT]
[FONT=&]Hue gave up a 1st and 2nd for Carson Palmer and decided RG3 was the QB he wanted last year.
[/FONT]
[FONT=&]
[/FONT]
K
kizer permanente
Posts: 667
Nov 1, 2017 4:31pm
Yes it’s a shitty opinion that bc we have better players on the line, our run d is better. Jesus Christ you’re the worst to talk football with.SportsAndLady;1879814 wrote:That’s your opinion and it’s a shitty one.
Defense has greatly improved, but yeah the d coordinator sucks because SQ sees too many schemes where the safety is playing too deep for his liking. Smh
Commander of Awesome
Posts: 23,151
Nov 1, 2017 4:37pm
Only bc you can't talk to yourself.kizer permanente;1879830 wrote:Yes it’s a shitty opinion that bc we have better players on the line, our run d is better. Jesus Christ you’re the worst to talk football with.
K
kizer permanente
Posts: 667
Nov 1, 2017 4:40pm
Uh huh... time for the Coa, Like that, and s&l circle jerk. One of them was offended.
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Nov 1, 2017 4:41pm
That’s rich coming from you. You have zero proof with anything you say. You just say your opinion and if anyone disagrees they’re wrong because you’re right.kizer permanente;1879830 wrote:Yes it’s a shitty opinion that bc we have better players on the line, our run d is better. Jesus Christ you’re the worst to talk football with.
For example, you give our d line ALL the credit for our improved defense but give zero credit to our d coordinator who coaches them and calls the plays. And you give zero props to him because you don’t like how sometimes one of our safeties gets matched up on the wrong guy and they sometimes play too far off the receivers. Lol
K
kizer permanente
Posts: 667
Nov 1, 2017 4:46pm
It’s called giving examples to support your opinion. Something you never do lol. You just tell people they’re stupid bc you don’t agreeSportsAndLady;1879834 wrote:That’s rich coming from you. You have zero proof with anything you say. You just say your opinion and if anyone disagrees they’re wrong because you’re right.
For example, you give our d line ALL the credit for our improved defense but give zero credit to our d coordinator who coaches them and calls the plays. And you give zero props to him because you don’t like how sometimes one of our safeties gets matched up on the wrong guy and they sometimes play too far off the receivers. Lol
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Nov 1, 2017 4:52pm
Your example for firing our D coordinator who’s defense is respectable is because you don’t like his schemes. Sweet proof!!kizer permanente;1879836 wrote:It’s called giving examples to support your opinion. Something you never do lol. You just tell people they’re stupid bc you don’t agree
Commander of Awesome
Posts: 23,151
Nov 1, 2017 4:52pm
There it is! I was waiting for it, ppl don't agree with your dumbass hottaeks, it's bc we're circle jerking. There are many examples of S&L arguing on here. Nice fail!kizer permanente;1879833 wrote:Uh huh... time for the Coa, Like that, and s&l circle jerk. One of them was offended.
K
kizer permanente
Posts: 667
Nov 1, 2017 4:57pm
There’s no “Commander of Awesome;1879838 wrote:There it is! I was waiting for it, ppl don't agree with your dumbass hottaeks, it's bc we're circle jerking. There are many examples of S&L arguing on here. Nice fail!
eople”. It’s you 3 lol. always you 3. It’s some weird triangle you 3 have. One of you is offended , the other 2 are right there to defend. Like clockwork. It’s creepy.
like_that
Posts: 26,625
Nov 1, 2017 4:59pm
SQ;1879836 wrote:It’s called giving examples to support your opinion. Something you never do lol. You just tell people they’re stupid bc you don’t agree
Cue SQ later pretending that this entire argument/debate is beneath him and never his fault, even though he finds himself in the center of every single one of them.
K
kizer permanente
Posts: 667
Nov 1, 2017 5:00pm
And right one cue #3 lol. It’s creepy.
Commander of Awesome
Posts: 23,151
Nov 1, 2017 5:05pm
Brings up being active on a message board as creepy, yet is the most active poster on said message board.kizer permanente;1879842 wrote:And right one cue #3 lol. It’s creepy.
like_that
Posts: 26,625
Nov 1, 2017 5:06pm
This response was predictable. I don't know if you have noticed, but there aren't many regular contributors to these threads, but most of them think you're an idiot. Regardless, COA and I have gone at it plenty of times on several different topics that were much more heated than this. COA and S&L have gone at it as well. You're just butthurt, because your dumbass takes are called out and nobody thinks they are good takes. Please go on and grasp onto your desperate cop out, because you can't handle the heat though.SQ;1879842 wrote:And right one cue #3 lol. It’s creepy.
K
kizer permanente
Posts: 667
Nov 1, 2017 5:07pm
Wrong or just intellectually dishonest. Hard to tell with you.Commander of Awesome;1879843 wrote:Brings up being active on a message board as creepy, yet is the most active poster on said message board.
It has nothing to do with activity. Just that you 3 have a gang mentality and harass people you don’t like. Only you 3.
Commander of Awesome
Posts: 23,151
Nov 1, 2017 5:12pm
Right on cue! /SQ Defensekizer permanente;1879845 wrote:Wrong or just intellectually dishonest. Hard to tell with you.
It has nothing to do with activity. Just that you 3 have a gang mentality and harass people you don’t like. Only you 3.
Anyways I'm tried of discussing your shitty hottaeks and victim butthurt mindset. No one here is attacking you lii guy, they're attacking your shitty hottaeks. Yeah buddy, we have a group chat where we plot and decide which poster we're going to "attack" this week. Then we argue with each other for pages at a time so you don't figure out our plot. But fuck you figured is out, yes we spend all of that time and effort, Just For You. Just lol.
like_that
Posts: 26,625
Nov 1, 2017 5:12pm
Now you're playing the victim card? LMFAO.SQ;1879845 wrote:Wrong or just intellectually dishonest. Hard to tell with you.
It has nothing to do with activity. Just that you 3 have a gang mentality and harass people you don’t like. Only you 3.
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
Nov 1, 2017 5:33pm
Umm, the only two guys on this D-line that are blue chippers are Garrett & Shelton. The rest are a bunch of rag tag guys like Nassib, Coley, Meder and Ogbah (who is a little better than the other three and I may be missing a guy or two). They've had better talent on the D-line in previous years and couldn't stop the run. Gregg Williams is doing a VERY good job with what he has.kizer permanente;1879830 wrote:Yes it’s a shitty opinion that bc we have better players on the line, our run d is better. Jesus Christ you’re the worst to talk football with.
K
kizer permanente
Posts: 667
Nov 1, 2017 5:38pm
Ogbahs been a stud this year. Especially compared to his rookie year last year. You can’t really be dismissing him ?BR1986FB;1879852 wrote:Umm, the only two guys on this D-line that are blue chippers are Garrett & Shelton. The rest are a bunch of rag tag guys like Nassib, Coley, Meder and Ogbah (who is a little better than the other three and I may be missing a guy or two). They've had better talent on the D-line in previous years and couldn't stop the run. Gregg Williams is doing a VERY good job with what he has.
K
kizer permanente
Posts: 667
Nov 1, 2017 6:44pm
Finally some good news... Gordon’s back.
S
slingshot4ever
Posts: 4,085
Nov 1, 2017 6:55pm
Probably won't hit the field until next year
K
kizer permanente
Posts: 667
Nov 1, 2017 7:24pm
I see he’s elligble week 13. You don’t think he gets on the field his year?