Archive 2017 NFL Chatter

Commander of Awesome

Posts: 23,151

Sep 15, 2017 3:46pm

Crimson streak;1871863 wrote:Watson looked terrible. His pocket awareness is almost non existent. He looked to take off running almost as soon as the ball was snapped.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

If only someone here could have foreseen that he'd be terrible.... Oh wait, I DID!

like_that

Posts: 26,625

Sep 15, 2017 3:46pm

Commander of Awesome;1871865 wrote:If only someone here could have foreseen that he'd be terrible.... Oh wait, I DID!

Don't be sleeper. I don't recall many (if any) of us saying we should draft him.

iclfan2

Posts: 6,360

Sep 15, 2017 3:52pm

like_that;1871866 wrote:Don't be sleeper. I don't recall many (if any) of us saying we should draft him.

I definitely did not

Commander of Awesome

Posts: 23,151

Sep 15, 2017 3:58pm

like_that;1871866 wrote:Don't be sleeper. I don't recall many (if any) of us saying we should draft him.

Should have done a better job keeping track of the posters who did. Def not being a BR/Sleeper here, arguing with myself. I believe S&L loved him, trying to recall the others. Either way, point taken, I'll stop mentioning it every INT.

Crimson streak

Posts: 9,002

Sep 15, 2017 4:04pm

Commander of Awesome;1871868 wrote:Should have done a better job keeping track of the posters who did. Def not being a BR/Sleeper here, arguing with myself. I believe S&L loved him, trying to recall the others. Either way, point taken, I'll stop mentioning it every INT.

I definitely didn't want anything to do with him. His stats vs pressure was terrible. I think I was the only one that actually wanted Kizer.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

V

vball10set

Posts: 24,795

Sep 15, 2017 4:08pm

Crimson streak;1871869 wrote:I definitely didn't want anything to do with him. His stats vs pressure was terrible. I think I was the only one that actually wanted Kizer.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Sorry to burst your bubble, but I did as well...the Toledo connection and all.

Commander of Awesome

Posts: 23,151

Sep 15, 2017 4:09pm

Crimson streak;1871869 wrote:I definitely didn't want anything to do with him. His stats were terrible. I think I was the only one that actually wanted Kizer.

FIFY

like_that

Posts: 26,625

Sep 15, 2017 4:12pm

Crimson was all in on Kizer before the season started last year. I even made fun of him for it, so hopefully I am completely wrong.

Crimson streak

Posts: 9,002

Sep 15, 2017 4:21pm

like_that;1871873 wrote:Crimson was all in on Kizer before the season started last year. I even made fun of him for it, so hopefully I am completely wrong.

I just knew the type of kid he was and watched so many of his games and the way he stands in the pocket and handles pressure that he could be a damn good qb. He has all the talent in the world and his weaknesses have always been fixable traits. Obviously the jury is still out on him but he should only keep getting better as he gains more reps and experience.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Iliketurtles

Posts: 8,191

Sep 15, 2017 4:28pm

I wasn't a fan of Watson either I honestly don't remember anyone being high on him. I thought on Mahomes was the best QB from this class even though he was from the Big 12 (I think you did too COA). Then Crimson was all in on Kizer. I think hes been posting about him since the 2016 draft. But I'm pretty sure most everyone thought this class sucked as far as QBs went.

SportsAndLady

Posts: 35,632

Sep 15, 2017 4:45pm

Commander of Awesome;1871868 wrote:Should have done a better job keeping track of the posters who did. Def not being a BR/Sleeper here, arguing with myself. I believe S&L loved him, trying to recall the others. Either way, point taken, I'll stop mentioning it every INT.

Where's your proof? I don't remember ever being very high on Watson.

Iliketurtles

Posts: 8,191

Sep 15, 2017 5:04pm

SportsAndLady;1871879 wrote:Where's your proof? I don't remember ever being very high on Watson.

You probably just mentioned Watson's name in one of your "I don't care who they take just take a QB" posts.

SportsAndLady

Posts: 35,632

Sep 15, 2017 5:54pm

Iliketurtles;1871882 wrote:You probably just mentioned Watson's name in one of your "I don't care who they take just take a QB" posts.

Lol maybe. I remember saying Watson wouldn't make a good NFL QB in college football forums. But that was years ago. Maybe I said Watson had a good preseason game?

I'm definitely on record of saying Mitchell trubisky will be great.

B

BR1986FB

Posts: 24,104

Sep 15, 2017 5:57pm

like_that;1871866 wrote:Don't be sleeper. I don't recall many (if any) of us saying we should draft him.

I don't recall anyone being on the Watson bandwagon on here. Arm strength was a major concern from the start.

B

BR1986FB

Posts: 24,104

Sep 15, 2017 5:58pm

SportsAndLady;1871879 wrote:Where's your proof? I don't remember ever being very high on Watson.

I'll back you on this one. Pretty sure I recall you being in the "do not draft" camp on Watson.

B

BR1986FB

Posts: 24,104

Sep 15, 2017 5:59pm

Iliketurtles;1871876 wrote:But I'm pretty sure most everyone thought this class sucked as far as QBs went.

This. I wanted them to trade for Garoppolo. LOL

Commander of Awesome

Posts: 23,151

Sep 15, 2017 6:24pm

Iliketurtles;1871876 wrote:I wasn't a fan of Watson either I honestly don't remember anyone being high on him. I thought on Mahomes was the best QB from this class even though he was from the Big 12 (I think you did too COA). Then Crimson was all in on Kizer. I think hes been posting about him since the 2016 draft. But I'm pretty sure most everyone thought this class sucked as far as QBs went.

This is true, I'm in love with Mahomes. He's a stud.

K

kizer permanente

Posts: 667

Sep 16, 2017 8:55am

Commander of Awesome;1871901 wrote:This is true, I'm in love with Mahomes. He's a stud.

I'm curious as to why you think this? He's got a big arm but that's it. He's got even worse accuracy issues than kizer and he has no idea how to move in a pocket.he may actually have the worst footwork of anyone drafted. I can't see him lasting too long in the NFL.

Ironman92

Posts: 49,363

Sep 17, 2017 1:12pm

Ryan DeShazer? Good analyst work there by Fox?

F

friendfromlowry

Posts: 6,239

Sep 17, 2017 3:49pm

Kansas City might have a date with the Super Bowl. They've looked great.

Ironman92

Posts: 49,363

Sep 17, 2017 4:00pm

Good win for the Steelers. Fortunate Bradford was out.

T

thavoice

Posts: 14,376

Sep 17, 2017 4:58pm

Ironman92;1872149 wrote:Good win for the Steelers. Fortunate Bradford was out.

2-0 is 2-0.

Always good to get wins whenthe offense isn't quite clicking. Game wasn't on so followed on Game cast and Bell workload is increasing and looks like Bryant is also getting on the same page.

Hope watts groin injury isn't too bad.

Now to week 3. In the nfl.....any given Sunday so ya never know what will happen but I will never apologize for being 2-0

wildcats20

Posts: 27,794

Sep 17, 2017 5:00pm

Lightning delay in Denver. Yay.

Heretic

Posts: 18,820

Sep 17, 2017 7:20pm

Steelers with a good win. Would rather have had them finish off a couple more drives, but they did more than enough to beat a team led by Case Fucking Keenum. Chicago next I think, which should be an easy win, as long as it isn't their yearly inexplicable loss to a horrible team. With it being a road game, that's actually kind of likely, lol.

wildcats20

Posts: 27,794

Sep 17, 2017 7:27pm

Dallas defense might be worse than the defense from 2 years ago.