Seth Rich .... just not going away DNC

Home ▸ Archive ▸ Politics ▸ Seth Rich .... just not going away DNC
I

isadore

Senior Member

7,762 posts
QuakerOats;1865132 wrote:is he part of the Clinton body count?
Aug 2, 2017 6:43pm
Belly35's avatar

Belly35

Elderly Intellectual

9,716 posts
Even the nose ring democrate cant let this issue take a pass ...... Wonder why.......Just not going way .....
Aug 2, 2017 10:44pm
Spock's avatar

Spock

Senior Member

2,853 posts
Belly35;1865188 wrote:Even the nose ring democrate cant let this issue take a pass ...... Wonder why.......Just not going way .....
they are trying to deflect from the truth. They know that the info that Fox is peddling is likely truth
Aug 3, 2017 7:57am
Q

QuakerOats

Senior Member

8,740 posts
Why the bleaching of drives and servers?

Why does Wasserman desperately want her wrecked computer back from the wire fraudster?

When will the real crimes be investigated?
Aug 3, 2017 10:29am
G

gut

Senior Member

15,058 posts
QuakerOats;1865223 wrote: Why does Wasserman desperately want her wrecked computer back from the wire fraudster?
Usually the simplest explanation is best. I think it's obvious that the hacking crime was done and over, but not all of the damaging emails - including possible criminality - were hacked/released. Basically the same reasons Hillary was running a private server. And I don't know if there's a lot more to the "screw Bernie" angle that, as DNC, there's potential election fraud.

You don't invite the cops into your home with marijuana everywhere just because someone smashed your window.
Aug 3, 2017 11:04am
Belly35's avatar

Belly35

Elderly Intellectual

9,716 posts
QuakerOats;1865223 wrote:Why the bleaching of drives and servers?

Why does Wasserman desperately want her wrecked computer back from the wire fraudster?

When will the real crimes be investigated?
Huma classifed information e mails with porn on a laptop in the hands of a Weiner
Aug 3, 2017 12:13pm
I

isadore

Senior Member

7,762 posts
Spock;1865205 wrote:they are trying to deflect from the truth. They know that the info that Fox is peddling is likely truth
Aug 3, 2017 12:55pm
Q

QuakerOats

Senior Member

8,740 posts
Assassinated ........................not robbed, mugged, assaulted, or roughed up.
Aug 3, 2017 3:16pm
salto's avatar

salto

Senior Member

2,611 posts
Spock;1865205 wrote:they are trying to deflect from the truth. They know that the info that Fox is peddling is likely truth
Yup, I'm sure that is it.



[h=1]"Special Counsel Robert Mueller Impanels Washington Grand Jury in Russia Probe[/h][h=2]Expansion beyond Flynn grand jury is a sign the investigation in election meddling is ramping up"[/h]
https://www.wsj.com/articles/special-counsel-mueller-impanels-washington-grand-jury-in-russia-probe-1501788287
Aug 3, 2017 4:38pm
Spock's avatar

Spock

Senior Member

2,853 posts
salto;1865320 wrote:Yup, I'm sure that is it.



[h=1]"Special Counsel Robert Mueller Impanels Washington Grand Jury in Russia Probe[/h][h=2]Expansion beyond Flynn grand jury is a sign the investigation in election meddling is ramping up"[/h]
https://www.wsj.com/articles/special-counsel-mueller-impanels-washington-grand-jury-in-russia-probe-1501788287
Be careful what you wish for. The Clintons and the DNC isn't going to look good after this grand jury.
Aug 3, 2017 7:23pm
salto's avatar

salto

Senior Member

2,611 posts
Spock;1865345 wrote:Be careful what you wish for. The Clintons and the DNC isn't going to look good after this grand jury.
Clinton isn't the President.

Hope this helps.
Aug 3, 2017 7:39pm
Spock's avatar

Spock

Senior Member

2,853 posts
salto;1865347 wrote:Clinton isn't the President.

Hope this helps.
You do realize that the meeting was about Clinton and the dnc. The evidence will show the true collusion by the dems to rig a election. Their own.
Aug 3, 2017 7:50pm
salto's avatar

salto

Senior Member

2,611 posts
Spock;1865348 wrote:You do realize that the meeting was about Clinton and the dnc. The evidence will show the true collusion by the dems to rig a election. Their own.

Thanks Hannity.
Aug 3, 2017 7:57pm
Spock's avatar

Spock

Senior Member

2,853 posts
salto;1865350 wrote:Thanks Hannity.
Wouldn't know. I don't get fox news.
Aug 3, 2017 8:04pm
salto's avatar

salto

Senior Member

2,611 posts
"Report: Mueller probing Trumps' financial ties to Russia"

I'm sure you're right and it's really about Clinton and the dems.
Aug 3, 2017 9:03pm
Spock's avatar

Spock

Senior Member

2,853 posts
salto;1865361 wrote:"Report: Mueller probing Trumps' financial ties to Russia"

I'm sure you're right and it's really about Clinton and the dems.
You do realize that trump and his financial ties are off P.O. it's to the probe? They aren't getting his tax returns or anything like that.
Aug 3, 2017 9:31pm
Q

QuakerOats

Senior Member

8,740 posts
salto;1865361 wrote:"Report: Mueller probing Trumps' financial ties to Russia"


ooh, scary
Aug 4, 2017 9:33am
ptown_trojans_1's avatar

ptown_trojans_1

Moderator

7,632 posts
The Transcripts were "probably" Reince if I had to guess, or someone else that was recently let go. I'm not a fan of phone calls between leaders leaking. But, such is the nature of DC.
Also, I think the DOJ will be surprised who some of the leakers probably are. I'm guessing Jared/ Ivanka and Bannon are leakers for some stories. If someone does not like how a policy is turning out or is upset with someone in the West Wing, they leak the story.
I doubt the President is going to press on his family or Bannon...

Also, if this is the case, does that mean no one in the White House can speak at all to the press even on background, even if it is a policy the President supports?
Aug 4, 2017 11:31am
Q

QuakerOats

Senior Member

8,740 posts
It is one thing to leak drivel about White House machinations; it is another thing to leak (and publish) items that go to national security. Hopefully some people will end up in jail.




Draining the swamp is never easy.
Aug 4, 2017 12:05pm
ptown_trojans_1's avatar

ptown_trojans_1

Moderator

7,632 posts
QuakerOats;1865454 wrote:It is one thing to leak drivel about White House machinations; it is another thing to leak (and publish) items that go to national security. Hopefully some people will end up in jail.




Draining the swamp is never easy.
I guess it depends on how they define "National Security" which is a very, very broad term.
I'll still say leaks happen, always have and always will. It is a part of the free press. There will always be some loser in a policy argument that will leak a story to the Times or Post. Whether it is Watergate, the Pentagon Papers, Iran Contra, Wikileaks, Stuxnet, or these transcripts, things get out.
Aug 4, 2017 12:22pm