S
Sonofanump
Feb 20, 2017 10:34pm
No Gibwok on the poll?
SnotBubbles
Posts: 4,492
Feb 21, 2017 9:49am
Coin flip between Rose, Brown and Brown on who should be there.
I went with Rose. He would be the most nationally recognizable face on it and his accomplishments on the field are probably the hardest to argue against. Plus I like baseball.
I went with Rose. He would be the most nationally recognizable face on it and his accomplishments on the field are probably the hardest to argue against. Plus I like baseball.
justincredible
Posts: 32,056
Feb 21, 2017 9:52am
Are you sure about that? I voted for Larkin as well and he still only has 1 vote.thavoice;1838130 wrote:I agree. State has 4 of those teams including the oldest franchise with the reds. If griffey had best years here he would have been a no brainer. I would take out the golf and track guy and open it up to voting. I went with larkin
Laley23
Posts: 29,506
Feb 21, 2017 1:37pm
probably voted for Jim Brown, but doesn't want to admit it.justincredible;1838157 wrote:Are you sure about that? I voted for Larkin as well and he still only has 1 vote.
j_crazy
Posts: 8,372
Feb 21, 2017 2:48pm
shocked that woody hayes isn't the guy.
Laley23
Posts: 29,506
Feb 21, 2017 5:10pm
Not as many OSU fans on here as you'd think, and even less, I'd wager, on this forum.j_crazy;1838192 wrote:shocked that woody hayes isn't the guy.
Commander of Awesome
Posts: 23,151
Feb 21, 2017 7:51pm
Also not that many OSU fans who grew up watching Woody.Laley23;1838211 wrote:Not as many OSU fans on here as you'd think, and even less, I'd wager, on this forum.
V
vball10set
Posts: 24,795
Feb 22, 2017 8:01am
not too sure I agree with this?Laley23;1838211 wrote:Not as many OSU fans on here as you'd think, and even less, I'd wager, on this forum.
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Feb 22, 2017 8:29am
Thadumbassjustincredible;1838157 wrote:Are you sure about that? I voted for Larkin as well and he still only has 1 vote.
like_that
Posts: 26,625
Feb 22, 2017 8:30am
Btw, my issue with Rose and the reason I didn't vote for him is because he is only recognized as a good player due to his longevity.
justincredible
Posts: 32,056
Feb 22, 2017 8:43am
I don't think that's the only reason he's recognized as a good player, but it's probably the biggest reason due to compiling 4256 hits. He would still have HOF numbers if you threw out his last 5 or 6 (maybe a couple more) seasons.like_that;1838275 wrote:Btw, my issue with Rose and the reason I didn't vote for him is because he is only recognized as a good player due to his longevity.
According to baseball-reference his black ink HOF monitor for his career is 64 (14th all time) and the average black ink for a HOFer is 27. He had a 58 through his age 37 season.
like_that
Posts: 26,625
Feb 22, 2017 9:12am
That was sarcasm. I don't think you were around when gut made this argument. I am just poking fun at him. Rose is clearly is a HOF caliber player.justincredible;1838276 wrote:I don't think that's the only reason he's recognized as a good player, but it's probably the biggest reason due to compiling 4256 hits. He would still have HOF numbers if you threw out his last 5 or 6 (maybe a couple more) seasons.
According to baseball-reference his black ink HOF monitor for his career is 64 (14th all time) and the average black ink for a HOFer is 27. He had a 58 through his age 37 season.
justincredible
Posts: 32,056
Feb 22, 2017 9:19am
Well don't I feel silly.
Ironman92
Posts: 49,363
Feb 22, 2017 9:48am
Shit, you got me too. I had a big tl;dr readylike_that;1838282 wrote:That was sarcasm. I don't think you were around when gut made this argument. I am just poking fun at him. Rose is clearly is a HOF caliber player.
Damn you lol
Anyways cut off his last 6 years and had 3500+ hits and 650+ doubles [emoji3]....before age 40